• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者年龄、性别及给药方式对国民保健服务体系患者体验亲友测试结果的影响。

Influence of patients' age and sex and the mode of administration on results from the NHS Friends and Family Test of patient experience.

作者信息

Sizmur Steve, Graham Chris, Walsh Joan

机构信息

Survey Statistician, Picker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK

Survey Statistician, Picker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jan;20(1):5-10. doi: 10.1177/1355819614536887. Epub 2014 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1177/1355819614536887
PMID:24973979
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of demographic factors (patients' age and sex) and of the mode of administration of a national patient experience questionnaire in England: the NHS Friends and Family Test.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of April-August 2013 data collected using a mixed mode approach from 38,998 inpatients and 29,610 emergency department attendees at 429 wards or units in 32 hospitals. Multilevel models were applied with responses from wards nested within hospitals and trusts. Age, sex and mode of administration were entered as main effects.

RESULTS

There were consistent differences in response for patients and emergency department attendees related to their age and sex. Women gave less positive ratings than men, whilst the likelihood of positive responses increased with age except among the oldest age group (75 years and above). As regards mode of administration, online responses were significantly less positive than postcard responses: the mean differences in score were 22.0 points for inpatients (95% confidence interval 27.3 to 16.7) and 18.0 points for emergency department attendees (29.0 to 7.0). Telephone responses were significantly more positive than postcard responses, with a mean difference of 9.2 (1.6-16.8) in the emergency department setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the Friends and Family Test are vulnerable to bias from demographic factors and from the mode of administration. Comparisons between organisations should be avoided. Scores may be useful at a local level where the test is implemented consistently and patients' demographic characteristics remain stable. Improving the utility of the Friends and Family Test nationally requires a standardised method for administration and adjustment of results for demographic characteristics.

摘要

目的

调查人口统计学因素(患者年龄和性别)以及英国国家患者体验调查问卷(国民保健服务机构的朋友和家人测试)的管理模式所产生的影响。

方法

对2013年4月至8月的数据进行二次分析,这些数据是采用混合模式方法从32家医院的429个病房或科室的38998名住院患者和29,610名急诊科就诊者中收集的。应用多水平模型,病房的回答嵌套在医院和信托机构中。年龄、性别和管理模式作为主要影响因素纳入。

结果

患者和急诊科就诊者的回答在年龄和性别方面存在一致差异。女性给出的积极评价低于男性,而除最年长年龄组(75岁及以上)外,积极回答的可能性随年龄增加而增加。至于管理模式,在线回答的积极性明显低于明信片回答:住院患者得分的平均差异为22.0分(95%置信区间27.3至16.7),急诊科就诊者为18.0分(29.0至7.0)。电话回答的积极性明显高于明信片回答,在急诊科环境中平均差异为9.2(1.6 - 16.8)。

结论

朋友和家人测试的数据容易受到人口统计学因素和管理模式偏差的影响。应避免组织之间的比较。在测试实施一致且患者人口统计学特征保持稳定的地方层面,分数可能有用。在全国范围内提高朋友和家人测试的效用需要一种标准化的管理方法以及针对人口统计学特征对结果进行调整。

相似文献

1
Influence of patients' age and sex and the mode of administration on results from the NHS Friends and Family Test of patient experience.患者年龄、性别及给药方式对国民保健服务体系患者体验亲友测试结果的影响。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jan;20(1):5-10. doi: 10.1177/1355819614536887. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
2
Impact of case-mix on comparisons of patient-reported experience in NHS acute hospital trusts in England.病例组合对英格兰国民保健服务急性医院信托机构中患者报告体验比较的影响。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Apr;20(2):92-9. doi: 10.1177/1355819614552682. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
3
Do some trusts deliver a consistently better experience for patients? An analysis of patient experience across acute care surveys in English NHS trusts.一些信托机构是否为患者提供了始终如一的更好体验?对英国国民保健制度信托机构急性护理调查中患者体验的分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 May;21(5):381-90. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000588. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
4
Incidence and impact of proxy response in measuring patient experience: secondary analysis of a large postal survey using propensity score matching.代理回复在测量患者体验中的发生率及影响:一项使用倾向得分匹配法的大型邮寄调查的二次分析
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Apr;28(2):246-52. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw009. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
5
Factors relating to patients' reports about hospital care for coronary heart disease in England.与英国患者关于冠心病住院治疗报告相关的因素。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Apr;8(2):83-6. doi: 10.1258/135581903321466049.
6
Investigation of the degree of organisational influence on patient experience scores in acute medical admission units in all acute hospitals in England using multilevel hierarchical regression modelling.采用多层次分层回归模型,对英格兰所有急症医院的急性医疗入院科室中组织因素对患者体验评分的影响程度进行调查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 18;7(1):e012133. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012133.
7
National Testing of the Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Discharged to Community Survey and Implications for Adjustment in Scoring.国家对出院至社区患者护理体验的急诊调查测试及评分调整的影响。
Med Care. 2019 Jan;57(1):42-48. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001005.
8
Changes in inpatients' experiences of hospital care in England over a 12-year period: a secondary analysis of national survey data.英格兰12年间住院患者医院护理体验的变化:全国调查数据的二次分析
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jul;20(3):131-7. doi: 10.1177/1355819614564256. Epub 2014 Dec 21.
9
Children's and young people's experience of the National Health Service in England: a review of national surveys 2001-2011.英格兰国家医疗服务体系中儿童和青少年的体验:2001-2011 年全国调查综述。
Arch Dis Child. 2012 Jul;97(7):661-6. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300603. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
10
Evaluating the friends and family test.评估亲友测试。
Health Serv J. 2013 Sep 6;123(6365):18.

引用本文的文献

1
Net Promoter Score: a prospective, single-centre observational study assessing if a single question determined treatment success after primary or revision hip arthroplasty.净推荐值:一项前瞻性、单中心观察研究,评估在初次或翻修髋关节置换术后,一个单一问题是否能确定治疗成功。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Oct 27;24(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06981-y.
2
Understanding Patient Experience with Outpatient Cancer Rehabilitation Care.了解患者对门诊癌症康复护理的体验。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 25;11(3):348. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030348.
3
The ultimate question? Evaluating the use of Net Promoter Score in healthcare: A systematic review.
终极问题?评估净推荐值在医疗保健中的应用:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2328-2339. doi: 10.1111/hex.13577. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
4
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures in Peru: a cross-sectional study of satisfaction and net promoter score using the 2016 EnSuSalud survey.评估秘鲁的患者报告结局测量指标:使用 2016 年 EnSuSalud 调查评估满意度和净推荐值的横断面研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Aug;31(8):599-608. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014095. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
5
Better Patient Experience is Associated with Better Vaccine Uptake in Older Adults: Multicentered Cross-sectional Study.更好的患者体验与老年人更高的疫苗接种率相关:多中心横断面研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):3485-3491. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06187-1. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
6
Exploring the therapeutic alliance in Belgian family medicine and its association with doctor-patient characteristics: a cross-sectional survey study.探究比利时家庭医学中的治疗联盟及其与医患特征的关联:一项横断面调查研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e033710. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033710.
7
Comparison of Primary Care Experience in Hospital-Based Practices and Community-Based Office Practices in Japan.日本以医院为基础的实践和以社区为基础的办公室实践中的初级保健体验比较。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 Jan;18(1):24-29. doi: 10.1370/afm.2463.
8
Feasibility trial of a digital self-management intervention 'My Breathing Matters' to improve asthma-related quality of life for UK primary care patients with asthma.一项数字自我管理干预措施“我的呼吸很重要”改善英国初级保健哮喘患者哮喘相关生活质量的可行性试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 12;9(11):e032465. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032465.
9
The Patient Experience: Informing Practice through Identification of Meaningful Communication from the Patient's Perspective.患者体验:从患者角度识别有意义的沟通以指导实践。
Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Mar 20;6(1):26. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6010026.
10
Patient-Reported Measures for Person-Centered Coordinated Care: A Comparative Domain Map and Web-Based Compendium for Supporting Policy Development and Implementation.以患者为中心的协调护理的患者报告措施:支持政策制定与实施的比较领域地图及基于网络的概要
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 14;20(2):e54. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7789.