• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解患者对门诊癌症康复护理的体验。

Understanding Patient Experience with Outpatient Cancer Rehabilitation Care.

作者信息

Wood Kelley C, Bertram Jessica J, Kendig Tiffany D, Pergolotti Mackenzi

机构信息

ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, Mechanicsburg, PA 17050, USA.

Outpatient Division, Baylor Scott and White Institute for Rehabilitation, Dallas, TX 76132, USA.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 25;11(3):348. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030348.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare11030348
PMID:36766923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9914453/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding patient experience is key to optimize access and quality of outpatient cancer rehabilitation (physical or occupational therapy, PT/OT) services.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective mixed-method analysis of rehabilitation medical record data to better understand patient experience and aspects of care that influenced experience. From the medical record, we extracted case characteristics, patient experience data (Net Promoter Survey, NPS) and patient-reported outcome (PRO) data. We categorized cases as 'promoters' (i.e., highly likely to recommend rehabilitation) or 'detractors', then calculated NPS score (-100 [worst] to 100 [best]). We identified key themes from NPS free-text comments using inductive content analysis, then used Pearson [] or Spearman [] correlation to explore relationships between NPS, characteristics, and PRO improvement.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 383) were 60.51 ± 12.02 years old, predominantly women with breast cancer (69.2%), and attended 14.23 ± 12.37 visits. Most were 'promoters' (92%); NPS score was 91.4. Patients described two experiences (themes) that influenced their likelihood to recommend rehabilitation: (1) feeling comfortable with the process and (2) observable improvement in health/functioning, and described attributes of clinic staff, environment and clinical care that influenced themes. Likelihood to recommend rehabilitation was associated with achieving the minimal clinical important difference on a PRO ( = 0.21, < 0.001) and cancer type ( = 0.10, < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients who received specialized cancer PT/OT were highly likely to recommend rehabilitation. Feeling comfortable with the rehabilitation process and making observable improvements in health and/or functioning influenced likelihood to recommend. Rehabilitation providers should leverage the findings of this study optimize access to and quality of cancer rehab services.

摘要

背景

了解患者体验是优化门诊癌症康复(物理治疗或职业治疗,PT/OT)服务的可及性和质量的关键。

方法

我们对康复病历数据进行了回顾性混合方法分析,以更好地了解患者体验以及影响体验的护理方面。从病历中,我们提取了病例特征、患者体验数据(净推荐值调查,NPS)和患者报告结局(PRO)数据。我们将病例分为“推荐者”(即极有可能推荐康复治疗)或“贬损者”,然后计算NPS得分(-100[最差]至100[最佳])。我们使用归纳性内容分析法从NPS自由文本评论中确定关键主题,然后使用Pearson[]或Spearman[]相关性分析来探讨NPS、特征和PRO改善之间的关系。

结果

患者(n = 383)年龄为60.51±12.02岁,主要是乳腺癌女性患者(69.2%),就诊次数为14.23±12.37次。大多数是“推荐者”(92%);NPS得分为91.4。患者描述了影响其推荐康复治疗可能性的两种体验(主题):(1)对治疗过程感到舒适,(2)健康/功能有明显改善,并描述了影响这些主题的诊所工作人员、环境和临床护理的属性。推荐康复治疗的可能性与在PRO上达到最小临床重要差异相关(= 0.21,<0.001)以及癌症类型(= 0.10,<0.001)。

结论

接受专门癌症PT/OT治疗的患者极有可能推荐康复治疗。对康复治疗过程感到舒适以及健康和/或功能有明显改善影响了推荐的可能性。康复治疗提供者应利用本研究的结果来优化癌症康复服务的可及性和质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb9/9914453/aeefa719bb7d/healthcare-11-00348-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb9/9914453/aeefa719bb7d/healthcare-11-00348-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb9/9914453/aeefa719bb7d/healthcare-11-00348-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding Patient Experience with Outpatient Cancer Rehabilitation Care.了解患者对门诊癌症康复护理的体验。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 25;11(3):348. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030348.
2
Cancer rehabilitation services for older women with breast cancer: Impact on health-related quality of life outcomes.老年乳腺癌女性的癌症康复服务:对健康相关生活质量结果的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Aug;72(8):2402-2411. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19021. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
3
From Detractors to Promoters: A comparative analysis of patient experience drivers across Net Promoter Score subcategories.从诋毁者到推广者:净推荐值子类别中患者体验驱动因素的对比分析。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2024 Feb;30(1):e13197. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13197. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
4
In-Clinic versus Hybrid Cancer Rehabilitation Service Delivery during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Outcome Comparison Study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,门诊与混合癌症康复服务提供方式的对比:一项结局比较研究。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 29;30(10):8916-8927. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30100644.
5
Impact of Real-World Outpatient Cancer Rehabilitation Services on Health-Related Quality of Life of Cancer Survivors across 12 Diagnosis Types in the United States.美国真实世界门诊癌症康复服务对12种诊断类型癌症幸存者健康相关生活质量的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 18;16(10):1927. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101927.
6
Community-based outpatient cancer rehabilitation services for women with gynecologic cancer: acceptability and impact on patient-reported outcomes.针对妇科癌症女性患者的社区门诊癌症康复服务:可接受性及其对患者报告结局的影响
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Oct;30(10):8089-8099. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07227-8. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
7
Exploring patient experiences of cancer care in Northern Ireland: A thematic analysis of free-text responses to the 2018 Northern Ireland Patient Experience Survey (NICPES).探索北爱尔兰癌症护理患者体验:对 2018 年北爱尔兰患者体验调查(NICPES)自由文本回复的主题分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 7;21(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06577-z.
8
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
9
Patient satisfaction in otolaryngology: Can academic institutions compete?耳鼻喉科的患者满意度:学术机构能与之竞争吗?
Laryngoscope. 2012 May;122(5):1000-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.23255. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
10
Factors that shape the patient's hospital experience and satisfaction with lower limb arthroplasty: an exploratory thematic analysis.影响患者下肢关节置换术住院体验及满意度的因素:一项探索性主题分析
BMJ Open. 2016 May 23;6(5):e010871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010871.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilization outcomes of a cancer rehabilitation (CRNav) program: getting to the quadruple aim in cancer care.癌症康复(CRNav)项目的利用结果:实现癌症护理的四重目标
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Apr 5;33(4):357. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09388-8.
2
Impact of Real-World Outpatient Cancer Rehabilitation Services on Health-Related Quality of Life of Cancer Survivors across 12 Diagnosis Types in the United States.美国真实世界门诊癌症康复服务对12种诊断类型癌症幸存者健康相关生活质量的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 18;16(10):1927. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101927.
3
In-Clinic versus Hybrid Cancer Rehabilitation Service Delivery during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Outcome Comparison Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative Outcomes of a Digital Rehabilitation Program After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Retrospective, Observational Feasibility Study.全膝关节置换术后数字康复计划的术后结果:回顾性观察可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 19;6(9):e40703. doi: 10.2196/40703.
2
The ultimate question? Evaluating the use of Net Promoter Score in healthcare: A systematic review.终极问题?评估净推荐值在医疗保健中的应用:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2328-2339. doi: 10.1111/hex.13577. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
3
Community-based outpatient rehabilitation for the treatment of breast cancer-related upper extremity disability: an evaluation of practice-based evidence.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,门诊与混合癌症康复服务提供方式的对比:一项结局比较研究。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 29;30(10):8916-8927. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30100644.
基于社区的门诊康复治疗乳腺癌相关上肢残疾:基于实践的证据评估。
Breast Cancer. 2022 Nov;29(6):1099-1105. doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01388-4. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
4
Community-based outpatient cancer rehabilitation services for women with gynecologic cancer: acceptability and impact on patient-reported outcomes.针对妇科癌症女性患者的社区门诊癌症康复服务:可接受性及其对患者报告结局的影响
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Oct;30(10):8089-8099. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07227-8. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
5
The Effect of Mobile Care Delivery on Clinically Meaningful Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Engagement Among Physical Therapy Patients: Observational Retrospective Study.移动护理服务对物理治疗患者有临床意义的结局、满意度和参与度的影响:观察性回顾性研究。
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Feb 2;9(1):e31349. doi: 10.2196/31349.
6
Systematic Review of Functional Outcomes in Cancer Rehabilitation.癌症康复中功能结局的系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep;103(9):1807-1826. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.01.142. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
7
Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes.癌症康复中的临床结局评估以及患者报告结局的核心作用。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 24;14(1):84. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010084.
8
Factors influencing utilization of cancer rehabilitation services among older breast cancer survivors in the USA: a qualitative study.影响美国老年乳腺癌幸存者利用癌症康复服务的因素:一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Mar;30(3):2397-2405. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06678-9. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
9
A qualitative study exploring patient's experiences of oesophageal cancer surgery, through their personal advice to future patients.一项通过患者对未来患者的个人建议来探索食管癌手术患者体验的定性研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct;54:101983. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101983. Epub 2021 May 21.
10
Understanding the Patient Experience: A Conceptual Framework.理解患者体验:一个概念框架。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):906-910. doi: 10.1177/2374373520951672. Epub 2020 Aug 31.