• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家对出院至社区患者护理体验的急诊调查测试及评分调整的影响。

National Testing of the Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Discharged to Community Survey and Implications for Adjustment in Scoring.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Med Care. 2019 Jan;57(1):42-48. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001005.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001005
PMID:30363023
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The emergency department (ED) setting is unique and measuring quality of care in the ED requires the development of ED-specific tools. The Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Discharged to Community Survey was designed to measure patient experience in the ED setting.

OBJECTIVES

Describe results from the Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Discharged to Community Survey including respondent characteristics and reported patient experience, and examine factors, including mode of survey administration, associated with response propensity and response patterns.

RESEARCH DESIGN

In total, 16,006 discharges were sampled from 50 hospitals nationwide to receive the survey using a mode experiment design. Logistic regression modeled response propensity; linear regression examined associations between response patterns and patient characteristics and mode.

SUBJECTS

In total, 3122 survey respondents.

MEASURES

Measures of patient experience.

RESULTS

Patients reported that hospitals consistently informed them of the purpose of any new medications (84% yes, definitely), but did not consistently explain their possible side effects (53%). Age, education, health, and arrival by ambulance were significantly associated with response patterns. There were significant differences in response rate by mode: 29% mixed mode, 22% telephone only and 14% mail only. Mode of administration was significantly associated with response patterns whereby patients surveyed using telephone-only or mixed mode tended to respond more positively than those surveyed using mail only.

CONCLUSIONS

There is room for improvement in terms of patient experience in the ED setting. Effects of patient characteristics and survey mode on responses were large enough to necessitate appropriate adjustments if hospitals are to be compared in the future.

摘要

背景

急诊部(ED)的环境独特,需要开发特定于 ED 的工具来衡量护理质量。《急诊患者社区出院体验护理调查》旨在测量 ED 环境中的患者体验。

目的

描述《急诊患者社区出院体验护理调查》的结果,包括受访者特征和报告的患者体验,并研究与响应倾向和响应模式相关的因素,包括调查管理模式。

研究设计

在全国范围内,从 50 家医院中抽取了 16006 例出院患者进行抽样调查,采用模式实验设计进行调查。逻辑回归模型用于预测响应倾向;线性回归检验了响应模式与患者特征和模式之间的关联。

受试者

共有 3122 名调查对象。

测量指标

患者体验的测量指标。

结果

患者表示,医院始终告知他们新药物的用途(84%的人表示“肯定”),但并未始终解释其可能的副作用(53%)。年龄、教育程度、健康状况和救护车到达与响应模式显著相关。不同模式的响应率存在显著差异:混合模式为 29%,仅电话为 22%,仅邮件为 14%。管理模式与响应模式显著相关,通过电话或混合模式进行调查的患者比仅通过邮件进行调查的患者更倾向于做出积极响应。

结论

ED 环境中的患者体验仍有改进空间。患者特征和调查模式对响应的影响很大,如果未来要对医院进行比较,就需要进行适当的调整。

相似文献

1
National Testing of the Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Discharged to Community Survey and Implications for Adjustment in Scoring.国家对出院至社区患者护理体验的急诊调查测试及评分调整的影响。
Med Care. 2019 Jan;57(1):42-48. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001005.
2
Equivalence of mail and telephone responses to the CAHPS Hospital Survey.邮寄和电话方式回复《医疗保健消费者评估医院调查》(CAHPS Hospital Survey)的等效性。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):2120-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00479.x.
3
Effects of Survey Mode on Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Hospice Survey Scores.调查模式对医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估(CAHPS)临终关怀调查评分的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Mar;66(3):546-552. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15265. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
4
Emergency department visits by persons recently discharged from U.S. hospitals.近期从美国医院出院人员的急诊科就诊情况。
Natl Health Stat Report. 2008 Jul 24(6):1-9.
5
Comparison of mailed vs. on-site emergency department patient satisfaction surveys.邮寄式与现场式急诊科患者满意度调查的比较
J Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;47(6):702-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.057. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
6
Emergency department visits after lumbar spine surgery are associated with lower Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores.腰椎手术后急诊就诊与较低的医疗机构患者评估系统评分相关。
Spine J. 2018 Feb;18(2):226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.043. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
7
Effect of testing and treatment on emergency department length of stay using a national database.利用国家数据库研究检测与治疗对急诊科住院时长的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 May;19(5):525-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01353.x.
8
Emergency department care in the United States: a profile of national data sources.美国的急诊护理:国家数据源简介。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Aug;56(2):150-65. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.11.022. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
9
Development and validation of a patient experience of care survey for emergency departments.开发和验证用于急诊部门的患者护理体验调查。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):102-112. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13853. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
10
Emergency Department Patient Satisfaction with Treatment of Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism.急诊科低危肺栓塞患者的治疗满意度。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;19(6):938-946. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.9.38865. Epub 2018 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The patient-reported outcome measure for older people living with frailty receiving acute care (PROM-OPAC): field-testing and validation.老年人急性护理中衰弱患者报告结局测量工具(PROM-OPAC):现场测试和验证。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Oct 16;8(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00796-8.
2
Initial Development of a Patient Reported Experience Measure for Older Adults Attending the Emergency Department: Part I-Interviews with Service Users.针对急诊科老年患者的患者报告体验量表的初步开发:第一部分——与服务使用者的访谈
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 28;11(5):717. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050717.
3
A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys.
系统评价增强患者体验调查应答率和代表性的策略。
Med Care. 2022 Dec 1;60(12):910-918. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001784. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
4
National travel distances for emergency care.国家紧急护理旅行距离。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 24;22(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07743-7.
5
Adjusting for Patient Characteristics to Compare Quality of Care Provided by Serious Illness Programs.调整患者特征以比较重病护理计划提供的护理质量。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;25(7):1041-1049. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0423. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
6
Development and validation of a patient experience of care survey for emergency departments.开发和验证用于急诊部门的患者护理体验调查。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):102-112. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13853. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
7
Association of Emergency Department Waiting Times With Patient Experience in Admitted and Discharged Patients.急诊科等待时间与入院及出院患者就医体验的关联
J Patient Exp. 2021 Apr 28;8:23743735211011404. doi: 10.1177/23743735211011404. eCollection 2021.
8
Gender Differences in Patients' Experience of Care in the Emergency Department.急诊科患者护理体验中的性别差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(3):676-679. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06862-x. Epub 2021 May 7.