Korneli Christin, Danisman Selahattin, Staiger Dorothee
Molecular Cell Physiology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstrasse 25, D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany Institute for Genome Research and Systems Biology, CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Molecular Cell Physiology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstrasse 25, D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Plant Cell Physiol. 2014 Sep;55(9):1613-22. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu092. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
Plants show a suite of inducible defense responses against bacterial pathogens. Here we investigate in detail the effect of the circadian clock on these reactions in Arabidopsis thaliana. The magnitude of immune responses elicited by flg22, by virulent and by avirulent Pseudomonas syringae strains depends on the time of day of inoculation. The oxidative burst is stronger when flg22 is infiltrated in the morning in wild-type plants but not in the arrhythmic clock mutant lux arrhythmo/phytoclock1 (pcl1), and thus is controlled by the endogenous clock. Similarly, when bacteria are syringe-infiltrated into the leaf, defense gene induction is higher and bacterial growth is suppressed more strongly after morning inoculation in wild-type but not in pcl1 plants. Furthermore, cell death associated with the hypersensitive response was found to be under clock control. Notably, the clock effect depends on the mode of infection: upon spray inoculation onto the leaf surface, defense gene induction is higher and bacterial growth is suppressed more strongly upon evening inoculation. This different phasing of pre-invasive and post-invasive defense relates to clock-regulated stomatal movement. In particular, TIME FOR COFFEE may impact pathogen defense via clock-regulated stomata movement apart from its known role in time-of-day-dependent jasmonate responses. Taken together, these data highlight the importance of the circadian clock for the control of different immune responses at distinct times of the day.
植物对细菌病原体表现出一系列诱导性防御反应。在此,我们详细研究了生物钟对拟南芥中这些反应的影响。flg22、毒性和无毒丁香假单胞菌菌株引发的免疫反应强度取决于接种的时间。在野生型植物中,当在早晨注射flg22时,氧化爆发更强,但在无节律的生物钟突变体lux arrhythmo/phytoclock1(pcl1)中则不然,因此氧化爆发受内源性生物钟控制。同样,当将细菌通过注射器注入叶片时,在野生型植物中,早晨接种后防御基因的诱导更高,细菌生长受到的抑制更强,但在pcl1植物中并非如此。此外,发现与超敏反应相关的细胞死亡受生物钟控制。值得注意的是,生物钟效应取决于感染方式:在叶片表面进行喷雾接种时,傍晚接种后防御基因的诱导更高,细菌生长受到的抑制更强。侵入前和侵入后防御的这种不同阶段与生物钟调节的气孔运动有关。特别是,除了其在依赖于时间的茉莉酸反应中的已知作用外,“咖啡时间”可能通过生物钟调节的气孔运动影响病原体防御。综上所述,这些数据突出了生物钟在一天中不同时间控制不同免疫反应的重要性。