Global Health Center Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Ann Glob Health. 2014 Mar-Apr;80(2):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2014.04.013.
Despite the significant toll of mental illness on the Indian population, resources for patients often are scarce, especially in rural areas. Traditional healing has a long history in India and is still widely used, including for mental illnesses. However, its use has rarely been studied systematically.
The aim of this study was to determine the perspective of patients, their families, and healthy community members toward faith healing for mental illness, including the type of interventions received, perceptions of its efficacy, and overall satisfaction with the process. We also sought to explore the range of care received in the community and investigate possibilities for enhancing mental health treatment in rural Gujarat.
We interviewed 49 individuals in July 2013 at Dhiraj General Hospital and in 8 villages surrounding Vadodara. A structured qualitative interview elicited attitudes toward faith healing for mental illnesses and other diseases. Qualitative analysis was performed on the completed data set using grounded theory methodology.
Subjects treated by both a doctor and a healer reported they overwhelmingly would recommend a doctor over a healer. Almost all who were treated with medication recognized an improvement in their condition. Many subjects felt that traditional healing can be beneficial and believed that patients should initially go to a healer for their problems. Many also felt that healers are not effective for mental illness or are dishonest and should not be used.
Subjects were largely dissatisfied with their experiences with traditional healers, but healing is still an incredibly common first-line practice in Gujarat. Because healers are such integral parts of their communities and so commonly sought out, collaboration between faith healers and medical practitioners would hold significant promise as a means to benefit patients. This partnership could improve access to care and decrease the burden of mental illness experienced by patients and their communities.
尽管精神疾病给印度民众带来了巨大的影响,但患者的资源往往很匮乏,尤其是在农村地区。传统的治疗方法在印度有着悠久的历史,至今仍被广泛应用,包括治疗精神疾病。然而,其应用很少被系统地研究过。
本研究旨在确定患者、他们的家人和健康社区成员对精神疾病信仰疗法的看法,包括所接受的干预类型、对其疗效的看法以及对整个过程的满意度。我们还试图探讨社区中提供的护理范围,并调查在古吉拉特邦农村地区加强精神卫生治疗的可能性。
我们于 2013 年 7 月在 Dhiraj 综合医院和瓦尔道拉周围的 8 个村庄对 49 人进行了访谈。采用结构化的定性访谈方法了解他们对精神疾病和其他疾病的信仰疗法的态度。使用扎根理论方法对完成的数据进行定性分析。
接受医生和治疗师治疗的患者报告说,他们几乎都会强烈推荐医生而不是治疗师。几乎所有接受药物治疗的患者都认为自己的病情有所改善。许多患者认为传统的治疗方法可能是有益的,并认为患者应该首先向治疗师寻求治疗。许多人还认为,治疗师对精神疾病没有效果,或者不诚实,不应该使用。
患者对传统治疗师的治疗体验大多不满意,但在古吉拉特邦,治疗仍然是一种非常普遍的一线实践。由于治疗师是他们社区中不可或缺的一部分,且非常受欢迎,因此,信仰治疗师与医疗从业者之间的合作将具有很大的发展潜力,这可以作为一种使患者受益的手段。这种合作关系可以改善获得治疗的机会,并减轻患者及其社区所经历的精神疾病负担。