McKoon Gail, Ratcliff Roger
The Ohio State University, United States.
J Mem Lang. 2012 Apr;66(3):416-437. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.001.
Two ways to examine memory for associative relationships between pairs of words were tested: an explicit method, associative recognition, and an implicit method, priming in item recognition. In an experiment with both kinds of tests, participants were asked to learn pairs of words. For the explicit test, participants were asked to decide whether two words of a test pair had been studied in the same or different pairs. For the implicit test, participants were asked to decide whether single words had or had not been among the studied pairs. Some test words were immediately preceded in the test list by the other word of the same pair and some by a word from a different pair. Diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978; Ratcliff & McKoon, 2008) analyses were carried out for both tasks for college-age participants, 60-74 year olds, and 75-90 year olds, and for higher- and lower-IQ participants, in order to compare the two measures of associative strength. Results showed parallel behavior of drift rates for associative recognition and priming across ages and across IQ, indicating that they are based, at least to some degree, on the same information in memory.
一种是显性方法,即关联识别;另一种是隐性方法,即项目识别中的启动效应。在一个同时进行这两种测试的实验中,要求参与者学习词对。对于显性测试,要求参与者判断测试词对中的两个词是否在相同或不同的词对中学习过。对于隐性测试,要求参与者判断单个词是否在学习过的词对中。在测试列表中,一些测试词之前紧接着同一词对中的另一个词,而一些测试词之前紧接着来自不同词对的一个词。对大学生年龄组、60 - 74岁年龄段和75 - 90岁年龄段的参与者,以及高智商和低智商参与者的这两项任务都进行了扩散模型(拉特克利夫,1978;拉特克利夫和麦昆,2008)分析,以便比较两种关联强度的测量方法。结果表明,关联识别和启动效应的漂移率在各年龄组和不同智商水平上呈现出平行的行为,这表明它们至少在一定程度上基于记忆中的相同信息。