• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对儿童期新出现事件的实时解读。

Real-time interpretation of novel events across childhood.

作者信息

Borovsky Arielle, Sweeney Kim, Elman Jeffrey L, Fernald Anne

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Florida State University.

Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego, CA.

出版信息

J Mem Lang. 2014 May 1;73:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.001
PMID:24976677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4071296/
Abstract

Despite extensive evidence that adults and children rapidly integrate world knowledge to generate expectancies for upcoming language, little work has explored how this knowledge is initially acquired and used. We explore this question in 3- to 10-year-old children and adults by measuring the degree to which sentences depicting recently learned connections between agents, actions and objects lead to anticipatory eye-movements to the objects. Combinatory information in sentences about agent and action elicited anticipatory eye-movements to the Target object in adults and older children. Our findings suggest that adults and school-aged children can quickly activate information about recently exposed novel event relationships in real-time language processing. However, there were important developmental differences in the use of this knowledge. Adults and school-aged children used the sentential agent and action to predict the sentence final theme, while preschool children's fixations reflected a simple association to the currently spoken item. We consider several reasons for this developmental difference and possible extensions of this paradigm.

摘要

尽管有大量证据表明,成人和儿童会迅速整合世界知识,以便对即将出现的语言产生预期,但很少有研究探讨这些知识最初是如何获得和使用的。我们通过测量描述主体、动作和物体之间最近学到的联系的句子导致对物体的预期眼动的程度,来研究3至10岁儿童和成人中的这个问题。关于主体和动作的句子中的组合信息在成人和年龄较大的儿童中引发了对目标物体的预期眼动。我们的研究结果表明,成人和学龄儿童在实时语言处理中可以快速激活有关最近接触到的新事件关系的信息。然而,在这种知识的使用上存在重要的发展差异。成人和学龄儿童使用句子中的主体和动作来预测句子最后的主题,而学龄前儿童的注视反映了与当前所说项目的简单关联。我们考虑了造成这种发展差异的几个原因以及这种范式可能的扩展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f45/4071296/f0fa7a5e739a/nihms573580f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f45/4071296/ebab93713f08/nihms573580f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f45/4071296/46b3a7083ae1/nihms573580f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f45/4071296/193a4754e70f/nihms573580f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f45/4071296/63430efc77e6/nihms573580f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f45/4071296/345eef5eb8f0/nihms573580f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f45/4071296/f0fa7a5e739a/nihms573580f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f45/4071296/ebab93713f08/nihms573580f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f45/4071296/46b3a7083ae1/nihms573580f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f45/4071296/193a4754e70f/nihms573580f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f45/4071296/63430efc77e6/nihms573580f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f45/4071296/345eef5eb8f0/nihms573580f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f45/4071296/f0fa7a5e739a/nihms573580f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-time interpretation of novel events across childhood.对儿童期新出现事件的实时解读。
J Mem Lang. 2014 May 1;73:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.001.
2
Lexical activation during sentence comprehension in adolescents with history of Specific Language Impairment.有特定语言障碍病史的青少年在句子理解过程中的词汇激活。
J Commun Disord. 2013 Sep-Dec;46(5-6):413-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
3
Knowing a lot for one's age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. 相较于年龄,知识储备对儿童和成人的预期递进句理解能力有影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Aug;112(4):417-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 May 23.
4
Investigating individual differences in children's real-time sentence comprehension using language-mediated eye movements.利用语言介导的眼动研究儿童实时句子理解中的个体差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2003 Dec;86(4):314-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2003.09.001.
5
Prediction in a visual language: real-time sentence processing in American Sign Language across development.视觉语言中的预测:美国手语在整个发育过程中的实时句子处理
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2018;33(4):387-401. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1411961. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
6
The amount and structure of prior event experience affects anticipatory sentence interpretation.先前事件经历的数量和结构会影响预期句子的解释。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2017;32(2):190-204. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1238494. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
7
Grammatical aspect and event recognition in children's online sentence comprehension.儿童在线句子理解中的语法体貌与事件识别
Cognition. 2014 Oct;133(1):262-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
8
Preferential Inspection of Recent Real-World Events Over Future Events: Evidence from Eye Tracking during Spoken Sentence Comprehension.对近期现实世界事件的优先检查高于对未来事件的检查:来自口语句子理解过程中眼动追踪的证据。
Front Psychol. 2011 Dec 23;2:376. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00376. eCollection 2011.
9
Language-driven anticipatory eye movements in virtual reality.语言驱动的虚拟现实中的预期眼动。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1102-1115. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0929-z.
10
Preschool children's interpretation of object-initial sentences: neural correlates of their behavioral performance.学前儿童对物体起始句的解释:行为表现的神经相关性。
Dev Sci. 2012 Nov;15(6):762-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01167.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's and adults' use of fictional discourse and semantic knowledge for prediction in language processing.儿童和成人在语言处理中使用虚构话语和语义知识进行预测。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0267297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267297. eCollection 2022.
2
Developmental changes in how children generalize from their experience to support predictive linguistic processing.儿童如何从经验中进行泛化以支持预测性语言处理的发展变化。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Jul;219:105349. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105349. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
3
The Neural Underpinnings of Processing Newly Taught Semantic Information: The Role of Retrieval Practice.处理新教授语义信息的神经基础:检索练习的作用。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Aug 9;64(8):3195-3211. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00485. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
4
Semantic processing of adjectives and nouns in American Sign Language: effects of reference ambiguity and word order across development.美国手语中形容词和名词的语义处理:跨发育阶段的指代歧义和词序效应
J Cult Cogn Sci. 2019 Nov;3(2):217-234. doi: 10.1007/s41809-019-00024-6. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
5
Vocabulary size and Native Speaker self-identification influence flexibility in linguistic prediction among adult bilinguals.词汇量和母语者自我认同影响成年双语者语言预测的灵活性。
Appl Psycholinguist. 2018 Nov;39(6):1439-1469. doi: 10.1017/S0142716418000383. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
6
Developmental Timescale of Rapid Adaptation to Conflicting Cues in Real-Time Sentence Processing.实时句子处理中快速适应冲突线索的发展时间表。
Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;43(1). doi: 10.1111/cogs.12704.
7
The amount and structure of prior event experience affects anticipatory sentence interpretation.先前事件经历的数量和结构会影响预期句子的解释。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2017;32(2):190-204. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1238494. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
8
Maternal Socioeconomic Status Influences the Range of Expectations During Language Comprehension in Adulthood.母亲的社会经济地位会影响成年期语言理解过程中的期望范围。
Cogn Sci. 2017 May;41 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):1405-1433. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12488. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
9
Tracking sentence comprehension: Test-retest reliability in people with aphasia and unimpaired adults.追踪句子理解:失语症患者和无语言障碍成年人的重测信度
J Neurolinguistics. 2016 Nov;40:98-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
10
Roses Are Red, Socks Are Blue: Switching Dimensions Disrupts Young Children's Language Comprehension.玫瑰是红的,袜子是蓝的:维度转换会干扰幼儿的语言理解。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 29;11(6):e0158459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158459. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Language and the development of cognitive control.语言与认知控制的发展
Top Cogn Sci. 2010 Oct;2(4):631-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01080.x.
2
Towards a complete multiple-mechanism account of predictive language processing.朝着预测性语言处理的完全多机制解释前进。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):365-6. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002646. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
3
Prediction in processing is a by-product of language learning.预测在处理中是语言学习的副产品。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):350-1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002518. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
4
Can Speaker Gaze Modulate Syntactic Structuring and Thematic Role Assignment during Spoken Sentence Comprehension?说话人注视能否调节口语句子理解过程中的句法结构和主题角色分配?
Front Psychol. 2012 Dec 5;3:538. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00538. eCollection 2012.
5
Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning.词汇学习源于在线目标选择和缓慢联想学习的相互作用。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Oct;119(4):831-77. doi: 10.1037/a0029872.
6
Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake--but only for skilled producers.语言处理中的预测易如反掌——但仅限于熟练的生产者。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Aug;38(4):843-7. doi: 10.1037/a0029284. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
7
Knowing a lot for one's age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. 相较于年龄,知识储备对儿童和成人的预期递进句理解能力有影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Aug;112(4):417-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 May 23.
8
The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: evidence from eye tracking.场景、话语和世界知识的协调互动:来自眼动追踪的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2006 May 6;30(3):481-529. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_65.
9
Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: a review and critical evaluation.运用视觉世界范式研究语言加工:综述与批判性评价
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jun;137(2):151-71. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
10
Sentence processing in an artificial language: Learning and using combinatorial constraints.人工语言中的句子处理:学习和使用组合约束。
Cognition. 2010 Jul;116(1):143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Apr 28.