Suppr超能文献

对儿童期新出现事件的实时解读。

Real-time interpretation of novel events across childhood.

作者信息

Borovsky Arielle, Sweeney Kim, Elman Jeffrey L, Fernald Anne

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Florida State University.

Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego, CA.

出版信息

J Mem Lang. 2014 May 1;73:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.001.

Abstract

Despite extensive evidence that adults and children rapidly integrate world knowledge to generate expectancies for upcoming language, little work has explored how this knowledge is initially acquired and used. We explore this question in 3- to 10-year-old children and adults by measuring the degree to which sentences depicting recently learned connections between agents, actions and objects lead to anticipatory eye-movements to the objects. Combinatory information in sentences about agent and action elicited anticipatory eye-movements to the Target object in adults and older children. Our findings suggest that adults and school-aged children can quickly activate information about recently exposed novel event relationships in real-time language processing. However, there were important developmental differences in the use of this knowledge. Adults and school-aged children used the sentential agent and action to predict the sentence final theme, while preschool children's fixations reflected a simple association to the currently spoken item. We consider several reasons for this developmental difference and possible extensions of this paradigm.

摘要

尽管有大量证据表明,成人和儿童会迅速整合世界知识,以便对即将出现的语言产生预期,但很少有研究探讨这些知识最初是如何获得和使用的。我们通过测量描述主体、动作和物体之间最近学到的联系的句子导致对物体的预期眼动的程度,来研究3至10岁儿童和成人中的这个问题。关于主体和动作的句子中的组合信息在成人和年龄较大的儿童中引发了对目标物体的预期眼动。我们的研究结果表明,成人和学龄儿童在实时语言处理中可以快速激活有关最近接触到的新事件关系的信息。然而,在这种知识的使用上存在重要的发展差异。成人和学龄儿童使用句子中的主体和动作来预测句子最后的主题,而学龄前儿童的注视反映了与当前所说项目的简单关联。我们考虑了造成这种发展差异的几个原因以及这种范式可能的扩展。

相似文献

1
Real-time interpretation of novel events across childhood.
J Mem Lang. 2014 May 1;73:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.001.
2
Lexical activation during sentence comprehension in adolescents with history of Specific Language Impairment.
J Commun Disord. 2013 Sep-Dec;46(5-6):413-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
5
Prediction in a visual language: real-time sentence processing in American Sign Language across development.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2018;33(4):387-401. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1411961. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
6
The amount and structure of prior event experience affects anticipatory sentence interpretation.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2017;32(2):190-204. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1238494. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
7
Grammatical aspect and event recognition in children's online sentence comprehension.
Cognition. 2014 Oct;133(1):262-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
9
Language-driven anticipatory eye movements in virtual reality.
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1102-1115. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0929-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's and adults' use of fictional discourse and semantic knowledge for prediction in language processing.
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0267297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267297. eCollection 2022.
2
Developmental changes in how children generalize from their experience to support predictive linguistic processing.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Jul;219:105349. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105349. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
3
The Neural Underpinnings of Processing Newly Taught Semantic Information: The Role of Retrieval Practice.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Aug 9;64(8):3195-3211. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00485. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
4
5
Vocabulary size and Native Speaker self-identification influence flexibility in linguistic prediction among adult bilinguals.
Appl Psycholinguist. 2018 Nov;39(6):1439-1469. doi: 10.1017/S0142716418000383. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
7
The amount and structure of prior event experience affects anticipatory sentence interpretation.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2017;32(2):190-204. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1238494. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
8
Maternal Socioeconomic Status Influences the Range of Expectations During Language Comprehension in Adulthood.
Cogn Sci. 2017 May;41 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):1405-1433. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12488. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
9
Tracking sentence comprehension: Test-retest reliability in people with aphasia and unimpaired adults.
J Neurolinguistics. 2016 Nov;40:98-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
10
Roses Are Red, Socks Are Blue: Switching Dimensions Disrupts Young Children's Language Comprehension.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 29;11(6):e0158459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158459. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Language and the development of cognitive control.
Top Cogn Sci. 2010 Oct;2(4):631-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01080.x.
2
Towards a complete multiple-mechanism account of predictive language processing.
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):365-6. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002646. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
3
Prediction in processing is a by-product of language learning.
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):350-1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002518. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
4
Can Speaker Gaze Modulate Syntactic Structuring and Thematic Role Assignment during Spoken Sentence Comprehension?
Front Psychol. 2012 Dec 5;3:538. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00538. eCollection 2012.
6
Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake--but only for skilled producers.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Aug;38(4):843-7. doi: 10.1037/a0029284. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
8
The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: evidence from eye tracking.
Cogn Sci. 2006 May 6;30(3):481-529. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_65.
9
Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: a review and critical evaluation.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jun;137(2):151-71. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
10
Sentence processing in an artificial language: Learning and using combinatorial constraints.
Cognition. 2010 Jul;116(1):143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Apr 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验