Fulford J, Liepa A, Barker A R, Meakin J
Exeter NIHR Clinical Research Facility, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Int J Sports Med. 2014 Dec;35(13):1078-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1372639. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
While phosphorous magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((31)P-MRS) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) provide methods for measuring spinal muscle function non-invasively, their reliability is not established. The aim of this study was assess the reliability (ICC) and error magnitude (CV%) of measurements of muscle phosphocreatine (PCr), tissue oxygenation index (TOI) and muscle deoxyhaemoglobin (HHb) acquired during fatigue and in recovery after 24 s of exercise in the lumbar muscles. 10 healthy participants (19-25 years, 5 male, 5 female) performed exercise that involved holding the upper body unsupported in slight extension until fatigue and then, after 30 min of rest, for repeated bursts of 24 s. ICCs indicated good to excellent reliability of baseline measures (TOI: 0.75) and of amplitude changes during fatigue (PCr: 0.73, TOI: 0.69, HHb: 0.80) and recovery (HHb: 0.96), and poor to fair reliability for time constants describing rates of change during fatigue (PCr: 0.11) and recovery (PCr: 0.31, HHb: 0.47). CV% indicated varying relative measurement error across baseline measures (TOI: 5%), amplitude changes during fatigue (PCr: 7%, TOI: 38%, HHb: 31%) and recovery (HHb: 31%), and in time constants for fatigue (PCr: 39%) and recovery (PCr: 20%, HHb: 37%). The results suggested that reliability would be sufficient for future studies on spinal muscle function, but that measurement error may be too large to evaluate individuals.
虽然磷磁共振波谱法((31)P-MRS)和近红外光谱法(NIRS)提供了非侵入性测量脊髓肌肉功能的方法,但其可靠性尚未确立。本研究的目的是评估在腰椎肌肉疲劳期间及24秒运动后的恢复过程中,肌肉磷酸肌酸(PCr)、组织氧合指数(TOI)和肌肉脱氧血红蛋白(HHb)测量值的可靠性(组内相关系数,ICC)和误差幅度(变异系数,CV%)。10名健康参与者(19 - 25岁,5名男性,5名女性)进行了一项运动,即在上半身无支撑的情况下轻微伸展并保持直至疲劳,然后在休息30分钟后,重复进行24秒的爆发性运动。ICC表明基线测量值(TOI:0.75)以及疲劳期间(PCr:0.73,TOI:0.69,HHb:0.80)和恢复期间(HHb:0.96)幅度变化的可靠性良好至优秀,而描述疲劳期间(PCr:0.11)和恢复期间(PCr:0.31,HHb:0.47)变化速率的时间常数的可靠性较差至一般。CV%表明基线测量值(TOI:5%)、疲劳期间(PCr:7%,TOI:38%,HHb:31%)和恢复期间(HHb:31%)的相对测量误差各不相同,以及疲劳(PCr:39%)和恢复(PCr:20%,HHb:37%)时间常数的相对测量误差也各不相同。结果表明,可靠性对于未来关于脊髓肌肉功能的研究来说是足够的,但测量误差可能太大而无法评估个体。