• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对无症状、平均风险的成年女性进行盆腔检查筛查:美国医师学院临床实践指南的证据报告。

Screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, average-risk adult women: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jul 1;161(1):46-53. doi: 10.7326/M13-2881.

DOI:10.7326/M13-2881
PMID:24979449
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pelvic examination is often included in well-woman visits even when cervical cancer screening is not required.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, benefits, and harms of pelvic examination in asymptomatic, nonpregnant, average-risk adult women. Cervical cancer screening was not included.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and Cochrane databases through January 2014 and reference lists from identified studies.

STUDY SELECTION

52 English-language studies, 32 of which included primary data.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted on study and sample characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Quality of the diagnostic accuracy studies was evaluated using a published instrument, and quality of the survey studies was evaluated with metrics assessing population representativeness, instrument development, and response rates.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The positive predictive value of pelvic examination for detecting ovarian cancer was less than 4% in the 2 studies that reported this metric. No studies that investigated the morbidity or mortality benefits of screening pelvic examination for any condition were identified. The percentage of women reporting pelvic examination-related pain or discomfort ranged from 11% to 60% (median, 35%; 8 studies [n = 4576]). Corresponding figures for fear, embarrassment, or anxiety ranged from 10% to 80% (median, 34%; 7 studies [n = 10 702]).

LIMITATION

Only English-language publications were included; the evidence on diagnostic accuracy, morbidity, and mortality was scant; and the studies reporting harms were generally low quality.

CONCLUSION

No data supporting the use of pelvic examination in asymptomatic, average-risk women were found. Low-quality data suggest that pelvic examinations may cause pain, discomfort, fear, anxiety, or embarrassment in about 30% of women.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Department of Veterans Affairs.

摘要

背景

即使不需要进行宫颈癌筛查,盆腔检查也常常包含在常规的女性健康检查中。

目的

评估无症状、非妊娠、平均风险的成年女性进行盆腔检查的诊断准确性、获益和危害。不包括宫颈癌筛查。

资料来源

通过 2014 年 1 月的 MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 数据库以及已确定研究的参考文献列表。

研究选择

52 项英文研究,其中 32 项研究包含原始数据。

资料提取

对研究和样本特征、干预措施和结局进行了资料提取。使用已发表的工具评估诊断准确性研究的质量,使用评估人群代表性、工具开发和应答率的指标评估调查研究的质量。

资料综合

2 项报道了这一指标的研究显示,盆腔检查对卵巢癌的阳性预测值小于 4%。没有发现研究调查筛查盆腔检查对任何疾病的发病率或死亡率获益。报道盆腔检查相关疼痛或不适的女性比例为 11%60%(中位数为 35%;8 项研究,n=4576)。报道盆腔检查相关恐惧、尴尬或焦虑的女性比例为 10%80%(中位数为 34%;7 项研究,n=10702)。

局限性

仅纳入了英文出版物;关于诊断准确性、发病率和死亡率的证据很少;报告危害的研究通常质量较低。

结论

未发现支持在无症状、平均风险女性中使用盆腔检查的证据。低质量的数据表明,大约 30%的女性进行盆腔检查可能会引起疼痛、不适、恐惧、焦虑或尴尬。

主要资金来源

美国退伍军人事务部。

相似文献

1
Screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, average-risk adult women: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.对无症状、平均风险的成年女性进行盆腔检查筛查:美国医师学院临床实践指南的证据报告。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jul 1;161(1):46-53. doi: 10.7326/M13-2881.
2
Periodic Screening Pelvic Examination: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.定期盆腔检查:美国预防服务工作组的证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2017 Mar 7;317(9):954-966. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12819.
3
No. 385-Indications for Pelvic Examination.第385号——盆腔检查的适应症
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Aug;41(8):1221-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.12.007.
4
Screening pelvic examination in adult women: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.成年女性盆腔检查筛查:美国医师学院临床实践指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jul 1;161(1):67-72. doi: 10.7326/M14-0701.
5
Do new guidelines and technology make the routine pelvic examination obsolete?新的指南和技术是否使常规盆腔检查过时了?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Jan;20(1):5-10. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2349. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
6
7
Summaries for patients. Screening pelvic examination in nonpregnant adult women: recommendations from the American College of Physicians.患者摘要。非妊娠成年女性的盆腔筛查检查:美国医师学会的建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jul 1;161(1):I-24. doi: 10.7326/P14-9021.
8
Screening for Gynecologic Conditions With Pelvic Examination: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.盆腔检查筛查妇科疾病:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2017 Mar 7;317(9):947-953. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0807.
9
Routine pelvic examinations: A descriptive cross-sectional survey of women's attitudes and beliefs after new guidelines.常规盆腔检查:新指南发布后女性态度与信念的描述性横断面调查
Prev Med. 2017 Jan;94:60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
10
Physician characteristics and beliefs associated with use of pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women.与无症状女性进行盆腔检查相关的医生特征和信念。
Prev Med. 2012 Jun;54(6):415-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient acceptability of CITOBOT for cervical cancer screening: A mixed-method study.用于宫颈癌筛查的CITOBOT的患者可接受性:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 24;20(6):e0325805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325805. eCollection 2025.
2
Neglected Intrauterine Device Migration Complications: Case Reports.被忽视的宫内节育器移位并发症:病例报告
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023 Jan 18;4(1):11-18. doi: 10.1089/whr.2022.0099. eCollection 2023.
3
The Relationship Between Sexual Assault History and Cervical Cancer Screening Completion Among Women Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration.
女性退伍军人在退伍军人健康管理局中的性侵犯史与宫颈癌筛查完成情况之间的关系。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Jul;31(7):1040-1047. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0237. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
4
Prevalence of Potentially Unnecessary Bimanual Pelvic Examinations and Papanicolaou Tests Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States.美国 15-20 岁青少年女孩和年轻女性中潜在不必要的双手骨盆检查和巴氏涂片检查的流行情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):274-280. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5727.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers for distinguishing malignant and benign ovarian masses.炎症标志物鉴别卵巢良恶性肿块的诊断准确性
J Cancer. 2018 Mar 8;9(7):1165-1172. doi: 10.7150/jca.23606. eCollection 2018.
6
Ending Cervical Cancer Screening in Low-Risk Women After Age 65: Understanding Barriers to Adherence With Evidence-Based Guidelines Among Primary Care Providers.65岁及以上低风险女性宫颈癌筛查的终止:了解初级保健提供者遵循循证指南的障碍
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2018 Mar 16;5:2333392818755241. doi: 10.1177/2333392818755241. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
7
Effect of professional society recommendations on women's desire for a routine pelvic examination.专业学会建议对女性进行常规盆腔检查意愿的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):338.e1-338.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 18.
8
Women's beliefs about the purpose and value of routine pelvic examinations.女性对常规盆腔检查目的和价值的看法。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):86.e1-86.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.031. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
9
Recommendations on routine screening pelvic examination: Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care adoption of the American College of Physicians guideline.常规盆腔检查筛查建议:加拿大预防保健工作组采用美国医师协会指南。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Mar;62(3):211-4.
10
Update on Medical Practices That Should Be Questioned in 2015.2015年值得质疑的医学实践最新情况
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1960-4. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5614.