Gattinoni Luciano, Cressoni Massimo, Brazzi Luca
aDipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione ed Emergenza Urgenza, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan bDipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico-Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan cDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Microchirurgiche e Mediche, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Sassari dUnità Operativa Complessa di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Aug;20(4):373-7. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000105.
Early acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by protein-rich inflammatory lung edema often associated with a hydrostatic component. Mechanical ventilation with positive intrathoracic pressure further induces salt and water retention, while impairing the pathways designed for edema clearance. In this framework, we will review the recent findings on fluid strategy and edema clearance in ARDS.
Consistently, conservative strategies lead to better oxygenation and reduce the length of mechanical ventilation. A possible drawback associated with conservative strategy is the impaired cognitive function. Echography may be used for safer use of furosemide or hemofiltration therapy during edema clearance. Albumin and furosemide techniques may accelerate edema clearance, particularly when pulmonary capillary permeability is restored. Beta-2 agonist therapy does not accelerate edema clearance and is potentially dangerous.
Lung edema is likely the single pathogenic factor more relevant for ARDS severity and outcome. Fluid overload must be avoided. Several monitoring techniques are available to reach this target. No specific studies are available to recommend a given fluid composition in ARDS. In our opinion, the general recommendations for fluid composition suggested for severe sepsis and septic shock should be applied to ARDS that may be considered an organ-confined sepsis.
早期急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的特征是富含蛋白质的炎症性肺水肿,常伴有静水压成分。胸腔内正压机械通气会进一步导致盐和水潴留,同时损害用于清除水肿的途径。在此背景下,我们将综述ARDS中液体策略和水肿清除的最新研究结果。
一直以来,保守策略可带来更好的氧合,并缩短机械通气时间。与保守策略相关的一个可能缺点是认知功能受损。超声检查可用于在水肿清除期间更安全地使用呋塞米或血液滤过治疗。白蛋白和呋塞米技术可能会加速水肿清除,尤其是在肺毛细血管通透性恢复时。β-2激动剂治疗不会加速水肿清除,且有潜在危险。
肺水肿可能是与ARDS严重程度和预后最相关的单一致病因素。必须避免液体超负荷。有多种监测技术可实现这一目标。尚无具体研究推荐ARDS中特定的液体成分。我们认为,针对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克建议的液体成分一般建议应适用于可被视为器官局限性脓毒症的ARDS。