Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah;
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jul;21(1):91-101. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14282.
The utilization of orthotic devices for lumbar degenerative disease has been justified from both a prognostic and therapeutic perspective. As a prognostic tool, bracing is applied prior to surgery to determine if immobilization of the spine leads to symptomatic relief and thus justify the performance of a fusion. Since bracing does not eliminate motion, the validity of this assumption is questionable. Only one low-level study has investigated the predictive value of bracing prior to surgery. No correlation between response to bracing and fusion outcome was observed; therefore a trial of preoperative bracing is not recommended. Based on low-level evidence, the use of bracing is not recommended for the prevention of low-back pain in a general working population, since the incidence of low-back pain and impact on productivity were not reduced. However, in laborers with a history of back pain, a positive impact on lost workdays was observed when bracing was applied. Bracing is recommended as an option for treatment of subacute low-back pain, as several higher-level studies have demonstrated an improvement in pain scores and function. The use of bracing following instrumented posterolateral fusion, however, is not recommended, since equivalent outcomes have been demonstrated with or without the application of a brace.
从预后和治疗的角度来看,矫形器在腰椎退行性疾病中的应用是合理的。作为一种预后工具,支具在手术前使用,以确定脊柱固定是否会导致症状缓解,从而证明融合术的合理性。由于支具不能消除运动,因此这种假设的有效性是值得怀疑的。只有一项低水平的研究调查了手术前支具的预测价值。观察到支具反应与融合结果之间没有相关性;因此,不建议进行术前支具试验。基于低水平证据,不建议在一般工作人群中使用支具来预防腰痛,因为腰痛的发生率和对生产力的影响并没有降低。然而,对于有背痛病史的劳动者,当使用支具时,观察到对工作日损失的积极影响。支具被推荐作为治疗亚急性腰痛的一种选择,因为几项更高水平的研究已经证明了疼痛评分和功能的改善。然而,不建议在后路融合术(instrumented posterolateral fusion)后使用支具,因为已经证明了应用或不应用支具的结果是等效的。