Feng An-Ping, Yu Shang-Feng, Zhu Ming-Tao, He Li-Ru, Lin Guang-Xun
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Third Hospital of Xiamen, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Third Hospital of Xiamen, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Nov 8;18(5):540-550. doi: 10.14444/8598.
There is a lack of consensus on the use of postoperative bracing for lumbar degenerative conditions. Spine surgeons typically determine whether to apply postoperative braces based primarily on clinical experience rather than robust, evidence-based medical data. Thus, the present study sought to assess the impact of postoperative bracing on clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates following lumbar fusion surgery in patients with degenerative spinal conditions.
Only randomized controlled studies published between January 1990 and 20 October 2023 were included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcome measures consisted of pre- and postoperative assessments of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Improvements in VAS and ODI scores were analyzed in the early postoperative period (1 month after operation) and at final follow-up, respectively. The analysis also encompassed fusion rates and complications.
Five studies with 362 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. In the early postoperative period, the brace group showed a relatively better improvement in ODI scores compared with the no-brace group (19.47 vs 18.18), although this difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.34). Similarly, during the late postoperative period, the brace group demonstrated a slightly greater improvement in VAS scores in comparison to the no-brace group (4.05 vs 3.84), but this difference did not reach statistical significance ( = 0.30). The complication rate was relatively lower in the brace group compared with the no-brace group (14.9% vs 17.4%), although there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups ( = 0.83). Importantly, there were no substantial differences in fusion rates between patients with or without braces.
The present meta-analysis revealed that the implementation of a brace following lumbar fusion surgery did not yield substantial differences in terms of postoperative pain relief, functional recovery, complication rates, or fusion rates when compared with cases where no brace was employed.
This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the clinical impact of postoperative bracing following lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative spinal conditions.
对于腰椎退行性疾病术后支具的使用缺乏共识。脊柱外科医生通常主要根据临床经验而非有力的循证医学数据来决定是否应用术后支具。因此,本研究旨在评估术后支具对退行性脊柱疾病患者腰椎融合手术后临床结局、并发症及融合率的影响。
本荟萃分析仅纳入1990年1月至2023年10月20日期间发表的随机对照研究。主要结局指标包括术前和术后的奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI)及视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分评估。分别在术后早期(术后1个月)和最终随访时分析VAS和ODI评分的改善情况。分析还包括融合率和并发症。
本荟萃分析纳入了5项研究,共362例患者。在术后早期,与无支具组相比,支具组ODI评分改善相对较好(19.47对18.18),尽管这一差异无统计学意义(P = 0.34)。同样,在术后晚期,与无支具组相比,支具组VAS评分改善略大(4.05对3.84),但这一差异未达到统计学意义(P = 0.30)。与无支具组相比,支具组并发症发生率相对较低(14.9%对17.4%),尽管两组间无统计学差异(P = 0.83)。重要的是,使用支具和未使用支具的患者在融合率方面无显著差异。
本荟萃分析表明,与未使用支具的情况相比,腰椎融合手术后使用支具在术后疼痛缓解、功能恢复、并发症发生率或融合率方面未产生显著差异。
本荟萃分析为退行性脊柱疾病腰椎融合手术后使用术后支具的临床影响提供了有价值的见解。