• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北欧白种女性中的妊娠期糖尿病:根据世界卫生组织(WHO)和简化的国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组(IADPSG)标准的患病率及危险因素

Gestational diabetes mellitus among Nordic Caucasian women: prevalence and risk factors according to WHO and simplified IADPSG criteria.

作者信息

Helseth Ragnhild, Salvesen Oyvind, Stafne Signe N, Mørkved Siv, Salvesen Kjell A, Carlsen Sven M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Drammen Hospital , Vestre Viken.

出版信息

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2014 Oct;74(7):620-8. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.928942. Epub 2014 Jul 1.

DOI:10.3109/00365513.2014.928942
PMID:24980704
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with both maternal and offspring adverse effects. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently adopted novel GDM criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate the former WHO and a simplified version of the new International Association for Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria as to prevalence of and risk factors for GDM in a Nordic Caucasian population.

METHODS

A 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed in 687 women at 18-22 and 32-36 pregnancy weeks. GDM was defined according to the WHO criteria as fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L and/or 2-hour plasma glucose ≥ 7.8 mmol/L and by a simplified version of the IADPSG criteria as either fasting glucose ≥ 5.1 mmol/L and/or 2-h plasma glucose ≥ 8.5 mmol/L. One-hour glucose values were not available and were thus not included in the diagnosis of GDM by IADPSG. Prevalence of GDM during pregnancy and risk factors for GDM at 18-22 weeks were studied in retrospect according to each of the two criteria.

RESULTS

The total prevalence of GDM during pregnancy was 6.1% (42/687) for the WHO criteria and 7.4% (51/687) for the simplified IADPSG criteria. High maternal age and short stature were independently associated with WHO GDM. Maternal age, fasting insulin and no regular exercise at 18-22 pregnancy weeks associated with simplified IADPSG GDM.

CONCLUSIONS

Simplified IADPSG criteria moderately increase GDM prevalence compared with the WHO criteria. Risk factors for GDM differ with the diagnostic criteria used.

摘要

背景

妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)与母婴不良影响均相关。世界卫生组织(WHO)最近采用了新的GDM诊断标准。本研究的目的是评估既往WHO标准以及新的国际妊娠糖尿病研究组(IADPSG)标准的简化版,以了解北欧白种人群中GDM的患病率及危险因素。

方法

对687名妊娠18 - 22周和32 - 36周的女性进行75克口服葡萄糖耐量试验。根据WHO标准,GDM定义为空腹血糖≥7.0 mmol/L和/或服糖后2小时血糖≥7.8 mmol/L;根据IADPSG标准的简化版,定义为空腹血糖≥5.1 mmol/L和/或服糖后2小时血糖≥8.5 mmol/L。无法获取1小时血糖值,因此IADPSG诊断GDM时未纳入该值。根据这两种标准,回顾性研究妊娠期GDM的患病率以及妊娠18 - 22周时GDM的危险因素。

结果

根据WHO标准,妊娠期GDM的总患病率为6.1%(42/687);根据IADPSG标准的简化版,总患病率为7.4%(51/687)。高龄产妇和身材矮小与WHO标准诊断的GDM独立相关。妊娠18 - 22周时的产妇年龄、空腹胰岛素水平以及缺乏规律运动与IADPSG标准简化版诊断的GDM相关。

结论

与WHO标准相比,IADPSG标准的简化版适度提高了GDM的患病率。GDM的危险因素因所使用的诊断标准而异。

相似文献

1
Gestational diabetes mellitus among Nordic Caucasian women: prevalence and risk factors according to WHO and simplified IADPSG criteria.北欧白种女性中的妊娠期糖尿病:根据世界卫生组织(WHO)和简化的国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组(IADPSG)标准的患病率及危险因素
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2014 Oct;74(7):620-8. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.928942. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
2
Gestational diabetes mellitus among Norwegian women with polycystic ovary syndrome: prevalence and risk factors according to the WHO and the modified IADPSG criteria.挪威多囊卵巢综合征妇女中妊娠糖尿病的患病率及危险因素:根据世界卫生组织和改良的 IADPSG 标准。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2013 Jun 7;169(1):65-72. doi: 10.1530/EJE-12-1107. Print 2013 Jul.
3
The World Health Organization (WHO) versus The International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their associated maternal and neonatal outcomes.世界卫生组织(WHO)与国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组协会(IADPSG)关于妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的诊断标准及其相关的母婴结局。
Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2018 Feb 17;34(1):hmbci-2017-0077. doi: 10.1515/hmbci-2017-0077.
4
The impact of adoption of the international association of diabetes in pregnancy study group criteria for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes.国际妊娠糖尿病协会标准用于妊娠期糖尿病筛查和诊断的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):224.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.027. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
5
Comparison of criteria of International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus.国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组(IADPSG)与英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)诊断妊娠糖尿病标准的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;302(1):47-52. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05564-9. Epub 2020 May 9.
6
Application of One-Step IADPSG Versus Two-Step Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes in the Real World: Impact on Health Services, Clinical Care, and Outcomes.一步法国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组(IADPSG)标准与两步法诊断标准在妊娠期糖尿病实际应用中的比较:对卫生服务、临床护理及结局的影响
Curr Diab Rep. 2017 Aug 10;17(10):85. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0922-z.
7
Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus evaluated by universal screening with a 75-g, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test and IADPSG criteria.采用75克2小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验及国际糖尿病和妊娠研究组(IADPSG)标准进行普遍筛查评估的妊娠期糖尿病患病率。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Aug;138(2):148-151. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12205. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
8
Heterogeneity of pregnancy outcomes and risk of LGA neonates in Caucasian females according to IADPSG criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus.根据 IADPSG 妊娠糖尿病诊断标准,白种女性妊娠结局的异质性与巨大儿新生儿的风险。
Diabetes Metab. 2013 Apr;39(2):132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
9
Have pregnancy outcomes improved with the introduction of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria in Japan?日本采用国际妊娠合并糖尿病研究组织标准后,妊娠结局是否得到改善?
J Diabetes Investig. 2020 Jul;11(4):994-1001. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13223. Epub 2020 Mar 1.
10
Impact of ethnicity on gestational diabetes identified with the WHO and the modified International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria: a population-based cohort study.基于人群的队列研究:采用世界卫生组织(WHO)和改良的国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组(IADPSG)标准诊断的种族对妊娠期糖尿病的影响。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2012 Feb;166(2):317-24. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-0866. Epub 2011 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Gestational glucose intolerance (GGI) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) among antenatal women attending urban community health centers of Lucknow: A cross-sectional study.勒克瑙市城市社区卫生中心产前妇女的妊娠期糖耐量异常(GGI)和妊娠期糖尿病(GDM):一项横断面研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Apr;12(4):611-618. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1134_22. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
2
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Studies.欧洲妊娠糖尿病:患病率研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 9;12:691033. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.691033. eCollection 2021.
3
Estimated impact of introduction of new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus.
妊娠期糖尿病新诊断标准引入的估计影响。
World J Diabetes. 2021 Jun 15;12(6):868-882. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i6.868.
4
A Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes in Norway.挪威妊娠期糖尿病患病率的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 3;18(4):1423. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041423.
5
Adherence rates to a prediction tool identifying women with an increased gestational diabetes risk: An implementation study.预测工具识别妊娠期糖尿病风险增加的女性的依从率:一项实施研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Jul;154(1):85-91. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13517. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
6
Incidence and Risk Factors of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study in Qingdao, China.妊娠期糖尿病的发病率及危险因素:中国青岛的一项前瞻性队列研究
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Sep 11;11:636. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00636. eCollection 2020.
7
Changing diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in Sweden - a stepped wedge national cluster randomised controlled trial - the CDC4G study protocol.瑞典妊娠期糖尿病诊断标准的改变:一项阶梯式楔形全国集群随机对照试验——CDC4G 研究方案。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 1;19(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2547-5.
8
Gestational weight management and pregnancy outcomes among women of advanced maternal age.高龄孕产妇的孕期体重管理与妊娠结局
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Sep;18(3):1723-1728. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7752. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
9
New medical risks affecting obstetrics after implementation of the two-child policy in China.中国实施二孩政策后影响产科的新医疗风险。
Front Med. 2017 Dec;11(4):570-575. doi: 10.1007/s11684-017-0552-5. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
10
Application of One-Step IADPSG Versus Two-Step Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes in the Real World: Impact on Health Services, Clinical Care, and Outcomes.一步法国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组(IADPSG)标准与两步法诊断标准在妊娠期糖尿病实际应用中的比较:对卫生服务、临床护理及结局的影响
Curr Diab Rep. 2017 Aug 10;17(10):85. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0922-z.