Professor for Medical Biometry, medac GmbH, Wedel, Germany.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;32(4):563-71. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
Methotrexate (MTX) is recognised as the cornerstone of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. For some patients, oral MTX demonstrates variable bioavailability, especially at higher doses. Such concerns may be mitigated by subcutaneous (SC) MTX administration. This study investigated the relative bioavailability, safety, and tolerability of MTX administered either by SC injection with a prefilled autoinjector pen (MTX pen) or orally.
This single-centre, open-label, randomised, 2-period, 2-sequence, single-dose, crossover study enrolled healthy subjects aged 18 to 55 years into 1 of 4 dose groups (7.5 mg, 15 mg, 22.5 mg, and 30 mg), where they received a single dose of SC MTX and of the oral MTX tablets. Blood samples were collected from subjects predose and at prespecified time points postdose for pharmacokinetic analyses. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded to assess differences in safety and tolerability.
Bioavailability, as measured by maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) and area under the plasma-concentration curves (AUC0-t), was generally higher with the SC MTX pen compared with oral administration for all dose groups. AUC0-t ratios increased with ascending doses; Cmax ratios did not increase. A total of 80 AEs were reported in 35/62 subjects; none were severe. Differences in the safety profiles were related to the route of administration. Single administrations with the MTX pen were well tolerated at the injection site.
Single-dose administration with the SC MTX pen resulted in a higher relative bioavailability compared with oral administration. SC MTX pen administration was associated with fewer gastrointestinal AEs than oral MTX.
甲氨蝶呤(MTX)被认为是治疗类风湿关节炎的基石。对于某些患者,口服 MTX 的生物利用度存在差异,尤其是在较高剂量时。通过皮下(SC)MTX 给药可以减轻这种担忧。本研究旨在比较 SC 预充式自动注射器笔(MTX 笔)与口服 MTX 给药的相对生物利用度、安全性和耐受性。
这是一项单中心、开放标签、随机、2 期、2 序列、单剂量、交叉研究,共纳入 18 至 55 岁的健康受试者,分为 4 个剂量组(7.5mg、15mg、22.5mg 和 30mg),分别接受单剂量 SC MTX 和口服 MTX 片。在给药前和给药后预定时间点采集受试者的血样进行药代动力学分析。记录不良事件(AE)以评估安全性和耐受性的差异。
在所有剂量组中,与口服给药相比,SC MTX 笔给药的生物利用度(以最大血浆浓度 [Cmax] 和血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积 [AUC0-t] 表示)通常更高。AUC0-t 比值随剂量增加而升高;Cmax 比值没有增加。在 35/62 名受试者中报告了 80 例不良事件(AE),均不严重。安全性特征的差异与给药途径有关。MTX 笔单次给药在注射部位具有良好的耐受性。
与口服给药相比,SC MTX 笔单次给药可获得更高的相对生物利用度。与口服 MTX 相比,SC MTX 笔给药与较少的胃肠道 AE 相关。