Goldberg D S, Batra S, Sahay S, Kawut S M, Fallon M B
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Am J Transplant. 2014 Sep;14(9):2081-7. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12783. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
Since 2006, waitlist candidates with portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) have been eligible for standardized Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception points. However, there are no data evaluating the current POPH exception policy and its implementation. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data to compare outcomes of patients with approved POPH MELD exceptions from 2006 to 2012 to all nonexception waitlist candidates during this period. Since 2006, 155 waitlist candidates had approved POPH MELD exceptions, with only 73 (47.1%) meeting the formal OPTN exception criteria. Furthermore, over one-third of those with approved POPH exceptions either did not fulfill hemodynamic criteria consistent with POPH or had missing data, with 80% of such patients receiving a transplant based on receiving exception points. In multivariable multistate survival models, waitlist candidates with POPH MELD exceptions had an increased risk of death compared to nonexception waitlist candidates, regardless of whether they did (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.73-3.52; n = 100) or did not (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.04-2.47; n = 55) have hemodynamic criteria consistent with POPH. These data highlight the need for OPTN/UNOS to reconsider not only the policy for POPH MELD exceptions, but also the process by which such points are awarded.
自2006年以来,患有门肺高压(POPH)的等待名单候选人有资格获得标准化的终末期肝病模型(MELD)例外积分。然而,目前尚无评估现行POPH例外政策及其实施情况的数据。我们利用器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)的数据,比较了2006年至2012年期间获得批准的POPH MELD例外患者与同期所有非例外等待名单候选人的结局。自2006年以来,155名等待名单候选人获得了批准的POPH MELD例外,其中只有73名(47.1%)符合OPTN正式的例外标准。此外,超过三分之一获得批准的POPH例外患者要么不符合与POPH一致的血流动力学标准,要么存在数据缺失,其中80%的此类患者基于获得例外积分而接受了移植。在多变量多状态生存模型中,与非例外等待名单候选人相比,有POPH MELD例外的等待名单候选人死亡风险增加,无论他们是否符合(风险比[HR]:2.46,95%置信区间[CI]:1.73 - 3.52;n = 100)与POPH一致的血流动力学标准。这些数据凸显了OPTN/UNOS不仅需要重新考虑POPH MELD例外政策,还需要重新考虑授予此类积分的流程。