Suppr超能文献

临床前瞻性损伤严重度评分:何时准确?

Clinical prospective injury severity scoring: when is it accurate?

作者信息

Civil I D, Schwab C W

机构信息

Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Camden, New Jersey.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1989 May;29(5):613-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198905000-00014.

Abstract

The development of Condensed Abbreviated Injury Scaling (CAIS) charts (based on AIS-85) has allowed the development of a method to perform early prospective clinical injury scoring (ISS). This information, when available within hours of admission, has allowed an awareness of the magnitude of injuries and creates an appropriate atmosphere for clinical management. In addition, ISS may be used as a rough guide to length of stay and the cost of care for the trauma patient. Three hundred thirty-seven patients entering a Level I Trauma Center were prospectively scored on a daily basis to determine the relationship between time following admission and accuracy. Overall, 18 patients (4.9%) required subsequent changes in their Injury Severity Scores after 24 hours. Patients having severe injury (ISS greater than 16) from blunt trauma had a higher likelihood of having "delayed" diagnosis that resulted in a slightly higher ISS. Overall, the accuracy of this scoring technique was 95% at 24 hours, 98% at 72 hours, and 99% at 5 days.

摘要

简明损伤定级(CAIS)图表(基于AIS - 85)的开发使得早期前瞻性临床损伤评分(ISS)方法得以发展。入院数小时内若能获取该信息,就能了解损伤的严重程度,并为临床管理营造适宜的氛围。此外,ISS可用作创伤患者住院时间和护理费用的大致参考。对进入一级创伤中心的337例患者每天进行前瞻性评分,以确定入院后时间与准确性之间的关系。总体而言,18例患者(4.9%)在24小时后其损伤严重程度评分需要随后调整。钝性创伤导致重伤(ISS大于16)的患者更有可能出现“延迟”诊断,从而导致ISS略高。总体而言,该评分技术在24小时时的准确率为95%,72小时时为98%,5天时为99%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验