Gold Liza H
Dr. Gold is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42(2):173-81.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) has dropped the multiaxial diagnostic system and moved to a dimensional system of diagnostic classification. This change means that there is no longer a separate Axis V or specific diagnostic category for assessment of functioning. In addition, the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF), the previously endorsed numerical rating scale used for assessment of functioning and reported on Axis V, has been eliminated. In its place, DSM-5 offers psychiatrists a new tool for assessment of global functioning and impairment, the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHODAS 2.0). Any single global assessment of functioning rating scale inevitably has limitations. Nevertheless, the GAF has been widely used in clinical and research settings and has been adopted as meaningful by psychiatric, legal, administrative, and insurance systems and institutions. The changes in DSM-5 in regard to the conceptual and practical assessment of functioning and impairment raise many questions. In this article, I review the implications for forensic psychiatric evaluations of the changes in the recommended assessment of functioning in DSM-5.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)摒弃了多轴诊断系统,转而采用维度诊断分类系统。这一变化意味着不再有单独的轴V或用于评估功能的特定诊断类别。此外,之前认可的用于评估功能并在轴V上报告的全球功能评估量表(GAF)已被取消。取而代之的是,DSM - 5为精神科医生提供了一种评估整体功能和损害的新工具,即世界卫生组织残疾评估量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)。任何单一的整体功能评估量表都不可避免地存在局限性。然而,GAF已在临床和研究环境中广泛使用,并被精神病学、法律、行政和保险系统及机构视为有意义的工具。DSM - 5在功能和损害的概念及实际评估方面的变化引发了许多问题。在本文中,我将回顾DSM - 5中推荐的功能评估变化对法医精神病学评估的影响。