• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较精神分裂症中的总体功能评估(GAF)和世界卫生组织残疾评估量表(WHODAS)2.0。

Comparing Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in schizophrenia.

机构信息

Harding Hospital, The Ohio State University, 1670 Upham Drive, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, First Floor, East Medical Plaza, 627 South Edwin C. Moses Boulevard, Dayton, OH 45417-1461, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jan;259:251-253. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.033. Epub 2017 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.033
PMID:29091824
Abstract

WHODAS-2.0 is a suggested replacement to the GAF in DSM-5. This study's purpose was to assess their comparative correlation in adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. 42 individuals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were administered both tools and the PANSS. Pearson product moment correlations were computed and the different methods compared using bootstrap. There was no significant correlation between raw WHODAS-2.0 and GAF scores for all participants and a modest correlation between corrected WHODAS-2.0 and GAF scores for outpatients. The WHODAS-2.0 and GAF did not correlate when WHODAS-2.0 was self-rated, and only modestly correlated when clinician-rater corrected.

摘要

WHODAS-2.0 是 DSM-5 中 GAF 的替代建议。本研究旨在评估其在精神分裂症谱系障碍成人中的比较相关性。对 42 名被诊断为精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍的个体进行了这两种工具和 PANSS 的评估。计算了皮尔逊积矩相关系数,并使用自举法比较了不同的方法。对于所有参与者,原始 WHODAS-2.0 与 GAF 评分之间没有显著相关性,而门诊患者校正后的 WHODAS-2.0 与 GAF 评分之间存在适度相关性。当 WHODAS-2.0 为自我报告时,WHODAS-2.0 和 GAF 之间没有相关性,而当临床医生校正时,只有适度相关性。

相似文献

1
Comparing Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in schizophrenia.比较精神分裂症中的总体功能评估(GAF)和世界卫生组织残疾评估量表(WHODAS)2.0。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jan;259:251-253. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.033. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
2
Validity of the self-rated 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 as a measure of functioning in Swedish psychiatric outpatients.自评的36项世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS)2.0作为瑞典精神科门诊患者功能测量工具的效度
Nord J Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;77(3):276-281. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2022.2097738. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
3
Using the WHODAS 2.0 to Assess Functioning Among Veterans Seeking Compensation for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0评估寻求创伤后应激障碍补偿的退伍军人的功能状况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Dec 1;66(12):1312-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400400. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
4
Characterization of Disability in Canadians with Mental Disorders Using an Abbreviated Version of a DSM-5 Emerging Measure: The 12-Item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0.使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)一项新出现的简版量表对加拿大精神障碍患者的残疾情况进行特征描述:12项世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS)2.0。
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;61(4):227-35. doi: 10.1177/0706743716632514. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
5
Assessing disability in older patients with schizophrenia: results from the WHODAS-II.评估老年精神分裂症患者的残疾状况:世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHODAS-II)的结果
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004 Jun;192(6):405-13. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000130133.32276.83.
6
The MIRECC version of the Global Assessment of Functioning scale: reliability and validity.功能总体评定量表的MIRECC版本:信度与效度
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Apr;58(4):529-35. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.4.529.
7
Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the 12-item Self-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in Patients with Schizophrenia.中文版 12 项自我报告世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS 2.0)在精神分裂症患者中的有效性和可靠性。
Acta Med Okayama. 2021 Jun;75(3):315-322. doi: 10.18926/AMO/62226.
8
Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders.12 项 WHODAS-2.0 在精神病门诊患者自然样本中的临床有效性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03101-9.
9
A comparison of patient ratings and staff ratings of disability using the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule in individuals with psychotic spectrum disorders who are forensic psychiatric inpatients.使用世界卫生组织残疾评估量表对精神病谱系障碍的法医精神病住院患者的残疾进行患者自评和员工评估的比较。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2024 Aug;34(4):347-359. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2344. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
10
Validity of the Spanish version of the Personal and Social Performance scale in schizophrenia.《个人与社会功能量表》西班牙语版在精神分裂症中的效度
Schizophr Res. 2009 Jul;112(1-3):181-6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.03.028. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuropsychiatric symptoms cluster as primary drivers of Long COVID complexity: a South Texas retrospective cohort study.神经精神症状群是长期新冠复杂性的主要驱动因素:一项南德克萨斯回顾性队列研究。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 23;16:1612489. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1612489. eCollection 2025.
2
Sex differences in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A population-based study.成人注意力缺陷多动障碍的性别差异:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 11;68(1):e90. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2441.
3
Systematic Literature Review of Studies Reporting Measures of Functional Outcome or Quality of Life in People with Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia.
关于报告精神分裂症阴性症状患者功能结局或生活质量测量指标的研究的系统文献综述
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2024 Jun 17;15:199-217. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S454845. eCollection 2024.
4
Targeting metacognitive change mechanisms in acute inpatients with psychotic symptoms: feasibility and acceptability of a modularized group intervention.针对急性精神病症状住院患者的元认知改变机制:模块化团体干预的可行性和可接受性。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Jun;274(4):963-979. doi: 10.1007/s00406-023-01690-y. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
5
"It cannot be boring!": Developing a measure of function for young adults accessing integrated youth services.“这不可能无聊!”:为使用综合青年服务的年轻人制定一项功能测量方法。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Sep 3;6(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00491-6.
6
Occupational Dysfunction as a Mediator between Recovery Process and Difficulties in Daily Life in Severe and Persistent Mental Illness: A Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling Approach.职业功能障碍在严重和持久精神疾病的康复过程与日常生活困难之间的中介作用:贝叶斯结构方程建模方法。
Occup Ther Int. 2022 Jun 17;2022:2661585. doi: 10.1155/2022/2661585. eCollection 2022.
7
Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, Quality of Life, and Stress Burden in Caregivers of Patients With Severe Mental Illness: An Underestimated Health Concern.严重精神疾病患者照料者的创伤后应激症状、生活质量及压力负担:一个被低估的健康问题。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 1;12:623499. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.623499. eCollection 2021.
8
Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders.12 项 WHODAS-2.0 在精神病门诊患者自然样本中的临床有效性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03101-9.
9
Abberant inverted U-shaped brain pattern and trait-related retinal impairment in schizophrenia patients with combined auditory and visual hallucinations: a pilot study.精神分裂症患者合并视听幻觉的异常 U 型脑模式和与特质相关的视网膜损伤:一项初步研究。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Apr;15(2):738-747. doi: 10.1007/s11682-020-00281-y.
10
Antipsychotic agents deteriorate brain and retinal function in schizophrenia patients with combined auditory and visual hallucinations: A pilot study and secondary follow-up study.抗精神病药物会恶化伴有视听幻觉的精神分裂症患者的大脑和视网膜功能:一项先导研究和二次随访研究。
Brain Behav. 2020 Jun;10(6):e01611. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1611. Epub 2020 Apr 14.