Suppr超能文献

对大量帕金森病患者群体进行认知功能受损领域筛查及其在帕金森病痴呆诊断程序中的应用。

Screening for impaired cognitive domains in a large Parkinson's disease population and its application to the diagnostic procedure for Parkinson's disease dementia.

作者信息

Ohta Kouichi, Takahashi Kazushi, Gotoh Jun, Yamaguchi Keiji, Seki Morinobu, Nihei Yoshihiro, Iwasawa Satoko, Suzuki Norihiro

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Tachikawa Hospital, Tachikawa, Shinjuku, Japan.

Department of Neurology, Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital, Fuchu, Shinjuku, Japan.

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2014 May 23;4(2):147-59. doi: 10.1159/000362124. eCollection 2014 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dementia is a new focus of research on improved treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). In 2007, a screening tool for PD dementia (PD-D) was developed by the Movement Disorder Society (Level I testing), which still requires verification by a large population study.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional and multicenter study including 13 institutions administering the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to 304 PD patients (mean age: 70.6 ± 8.3 years; mean Hoehn and Yahr stage: 2.7 ± 0.7).

RESULTS

In all, 34.5% of the patients had MMSE scores <26; 94.3% of these patients had impairments in ≥2 cognitive domains and met the criteria for probable PD-D by Level I testing. Executive dysfunction combined with attention and memory impairment was most common (51.4%). In the Level I subtests of executive function, the score for phonemic fluency declined by <50% in patients with high MoCA scores (24-30 points) and lacked specificity for PD-D. No patient had visuospatial impairment (measured by the pentagon copying subtest) alone, and the score for pentagon copying stayed at ≥70% even in patients with low MMSE scores (12-25 points), therefore lacking sensitivity for PD-D.

CONCLUSIONS

Level I testing with administration of the MMSE and MoCA is a practical and efficient screening tool for PD-D. However, the phonemic fluency and pentagon copying tests should be replaced by more specific/sensitive ones when screening for PD-D.

摘要

背景

痴呆症是帕金森病(PD)改善治疗研究的新焦点。2007年,运动障碍协会开发了一种帕金森病痴呆症(PD-D)筛查工具(一级测试),该工具仍需通过大规模人群研究进行验证。

方法

我们进行了一项横断面多中心研究,包括13个机构,对304例PD患者进行简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)(平均年龄:70.6±8.3岁;平均霍恩和雅尔分期:2.7±0.7)。

结果

总体而言,34.5%的患者MMSE评分<26;这些患者中94.3%在≥2个认知领域存在损害,并且通过一级测试符合可能的PD-D标准。执行功能障碍合并注意力和记忆损害最为常见(51.4%)。在执行功能的一级子测试中,MoCA评分高(24 - 30分)的患者音素流畅性得分下降<50%,且对PD-D缺乏特异性。没有患者单独存在视觉空间损害(通过五边形临摹子测试测量),即使MMSE评分低(12 - 25分)的患者五边形临摹得分也保持在≥70%,因此对PD-D缺乏敏感性。

结论

使用MMSE和MoCA进行一级测试是一种实用且高效的PD-D筛查工具。然而,在筛查PD-D时,音素流畅性和五边形临摹测试应被更具特异性/敏感性的测试所取代。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a57e/4067707/4cc41c73d938/dee-0004-0147-g01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验