School of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Int J Public Health. 2019 Jan;64(1):15-26. doi: 10.1007/s00038-018-1135-1. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
As global environmental change drives inequitable health outcomes, novel health equity assessment methodologies are increasingly required. We review literatures on equity-focused HIA to clarify how equity is informing HIA practice, and to surface innovations for assessing health equity in relation to a range of exposures across geographic and temporal scales.
A narrative review of the health equity and HIA literatures analysed English articles published between 2003 and 2017 across PubMed, PubMed Central, Biomed Central and Ovid Medline. Title and abstract reviews of 849 search results yielded 89 articles receiving full text review.
Considerations of equity in HIA increased over the last 5 years, but equity continues to be conflated with health disparities rather than their root causes (i.e. inequities). Lessons from six literatures to inform future HIA practice are described: HIA for healthy cities, climate change vulnerability assessment, cumulative health risk assessment, intersectionality-based policy analysis, corporate health impact assessment and global health impact assessment.
Academic reporting on incorporating equity in HIA practice has been limited. Nonetheless, significant methodological advancements are being made to examine the health equity implications of multiple environmental exposures.
随着全球环境变化导致不平等的健康结果,越来越需要新的健康公平评估方法。我们回顾了以公平为重点的 HIA 文献,以阐明公平如何为 HIA 实践提供信息,并发现了一系列与地理和时间尺度相关的暴露评估健康公平的创新方法。
对健康公平和 HIA 文献进行叙述性综述,分析了 2003 年至 2017 年间在 PubMed、PubMed Central、Biomed Central 和 Ovid Medline 上发表的英文文章。对 849 项搜索结果的标题和摘要进行审查后,有 89 篇文章进行了全文审查。
在过去的 5 年中,HIA 中对公平的考虑有所增加,但公平仍然与健康差距而不是其根本原因(即不公平)相混淆。描述了从六个文献中学到的六个信息,以指导未来的 HIA 实践:健康城市的 HIA、气候变化脆弱性评估、累积健康风险评估、基于交叉性的政策分析、企业健康影响评估和全球健康影响评估。
将公平纳入 HIA 实践的学术报告受到限制。尽管如此,为了研究多种环境暴露对健康公平的影响,已经取得了重大的方法进展。