O'Hara Ross E, Armeli Stephen, Tennen Howard
Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut.
Department of Psychology, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, New Jersey.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014 Jul;75(4):606-14. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.606.
This study examined whether global drinking-to-cope (DTC) motivation moderates negative mood-drinking contingencies and negative mood-motivation contingencies at the daily level of analysis.
Data came from a daily diary study of college student drinking (N = 1,636; 53% female; Mage = 19.2 years). Fixed-interval models tested whether global DTC motivation moderated relations between daily negative mood and that evening's drinking and episodic DTC. Time-to-drink models examined whether global DTC motivation moderated the effects of weekly negative mood on the immediacy of drinking and DTC in the weekly cycle.
More evening drinking occurred on days characterized by relatively higher anxiety or anger, and students were more likely to report DTC on days when they experienced greater sadness. However, only the daily Anxiety × Global DTC Motivation interaction for number of drinks consumed was consistent with hypotheses. Moreover, students reported drinking, heavy drinking, and DTC earlier in weeks characterized by relatively higher anxiety or anger, but no hypothesized interactions with global DTC motivation were found.
RESULTS indicate that negative mood is associated with increased levels of drinking and drinking for coping reasons among college students but that the strength of these relations does not differ by global levels of DTC motivation. These findings raise the possibility that global DTC measures are insufficient for examining within-person DTC processes. Further implications of these results are discussed, including future directions that may determine the circumstances under which, and for whom, DTC occurs.
本研究在每日分析层面检验了总体借酒消愁(DTC)动机是否会调节负面情绪与饮酒之间的偶发关系以及负面情绪与动机之间的偶发关系。
数据来自一项关于大学生饮酒的每日日记研究(N = 1636;53%为女性;平均年龄 = 19.2岁)。固定间隔模型检验了总体DTC动机是否会调节每日负面情绪与当晚饮酒及偶发性DTC之间的关系。饮酒时间模型考察了总体DTC动机是否会调节每周负面情绪对每周饮酒及时性及DTC的影响。
在焦虑或愤怒程度相对较高的日子里,晚上饮酒更多,而学生在经历更多悲伤情绪的日子里更有可能报告借酒消愁。然而,只有每日焦虑×总体DTC动机对饮酒量的交互作用与假设一致。此外,在焦虑或愤怒程度相对较高的几周里,学生报告饮酒、大量饮酒和借酒消愁的时间更早,但未发现与总体DTC动机的假设交互作用。
结果表明,负面情绪与大学生饮酒量增加及因应对原因而饮酒有关,但这些关系的强度在总体DTC动机水平上并无差异。这些发现增加了一种可能性,即总体DTC测量不足以检验个体内部的DTC过程。讨论了这些结果的进一步影响,包括未来可能确定DTC发生的情况及对象的研究方向。