• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互动失同步是欺骗的线索吗?非言语视觉线索自动分析的见解。

Is interactional dissynchrony a clue to deception? Insights from automated analysis of nonverbal visual cues.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Cybern. 2015 Mar;45(3):506-20. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2014.2329673. Epub 2014 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1109/TCYB.2014.2329673
PMID:24988600
Abstract

Detecting deception in interpersonal dialog is challenging since deceivers take advantage of the give-and-take of interaction to adapt to any sign of skepticism in an interlocutor's verbal and nonverbal feedback. Human detection accuracy is poor, often with no better than chance performance. In this investigation, we consider whether automated methods can produce better results and if emphasizing the possible disruption in interactional synchrony can signal whether an interactant is truthful or deceptive. We propose a data-driven and unobtrusive framework using visual cues that consists of face tracking, head movement detection, facial expression recognition, and interactional synchrony estimation. Analysis were conducted on 242 video samples from an experiment in which deceivers and truth-tellers interacted with professional interviewers either face-to-face or through computer mediation. Results revealed that the framework is able to automatically track head movements and expressions of both interlocutors to extract normalized meaningful synchrony features and to learn classification models for deception recognition. Further experiments show that these features reliably capture interactional synchrony and efficiently discriminate deception from truth.

摘要

人际对话中的欺骗检测具有挑战性,因为说谎者会利用互动的来来回回,根据对话者言语和非言语反馈中的任何怀疑迹象进行调整。人类的检测准确率很低,通常不比随机表现好。在这项研究中,我们考虑自动化方法是否可以产生更好的结果,以及强调交互同步性的可能中断是否可以表明互动者是否诚实或欺骗。我们提出了一个使用视觉线索的数据驱动和不引人注目的框架,该框架包括面部跟踪、头部运动检测、面部表情识别和交互同步性估计。分析了 242 个视频样本,这些样本来自一个实验,在这个实验中,说谎者和说实话者与专业面试官进行面对面或通过计算机中介的互动。结果表明,该框架能够自动跟踪双方的头部运动和表情,提取标准化的有意义的同步特征,并学习用于欺骗识别的分类模型。进一步的实验表明,这些特征可靠地捕捉了交互同步性,并有效地将欺骗与真实区分开来。

相似文献

1
Is interactional dissynchrony a clue to deception? Insights from automated analysis of nonverbal visual cues.互动失同步是欺骗的线索吗?非言语视觉线索自动分析的见解。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2015 Mar;45(3):506-20. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2014.2329673. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
2
Using Named Entities for Computer-Automated Verbal Deception Detection.利用命名实体进行计算机自动言语欺骗检测。
J Forensic Sci. 2018 May;63(3):714-723. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13645. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
3
The accuracy of auditors' and layered voice Analysis (LVA) operators' judgments of truth and deception during police questioning.审计人员以及分层语音分析(LVA)操作员在警方讯问过程中对真话和欺骗判断的准确性。
J Forensic Sci. 2013 Mar;58(2):385-92. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12066. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
4
Learning Multiscale Active Facial Patches for Expression Analysis.学习多尺度主动面部斑块进行表情分析。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2015 Aug;45(8):1499-510. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2014.2354351. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
5
Active and dynamic information fusion for facial expression understanding from image sequences.用于从图像序列理解面部表情的主动动态信息融合
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2005 May;27(5):699-714. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.93.
6
The reliability of lie detection performance.测谎性能的可靠性。
Law Hum Behav. 2009 Feb;33(1):96-109. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9137-9. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
7
Three-dimensional face pose detection and tracking using monocular videos: tool and application.基于单目视频的三维人脸姿态检测与跟踪:工具与应用
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2009 Aug;39(4):935-44. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2009566. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
8
Detecting deception in facial expressions of pain: accuracy and training.检测疼痛面部表情中的欺骗行为:准确性与训练
Clin J Pain. 2004 Nov-Dec;20(6):415-22. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200411000-00006.
9
C4: a real-time object detection framework.C4:一个实时目标检测框架。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2013 Oct;22(10):4096-107. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2013.2270111. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
10
Detecting ulterior motives from verbal cues in group deliberations.从小组讨论中的言语线索中察觉潜在动机。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 24;14:1166225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1166225. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
A deception detection model by using integrated LLM with emotion features.一种通过集成具有情感特征的大语言模型构建的欺骗检测模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 1;15(1):32135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17741-4.
2
Deception detection with machine learning: A systematic review and statistical analysis.使用机器学习进行欺骗检测:系统评价和统计分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 9;18(2):e0281323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281323. eCollection 2023.
3
A liar and a copycat: nonverbal coordination increases with lie difficulty.说谎者与模仿者:非言语协调随着说谎难度的增加而增强。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Jan 13;8(1):200839. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200839. eCollection 2021 Jan.
4
Conversing with a devil's advocate: Interpersonal coordination in deception and disagreement.与唱反调者交谈:欺骗与分歧中的人际协调
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0178140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178140. eCollection 2017.