Van Der Zee Sophie, Taylor Paul, Wong Ruth, Dixon John, Menacere Tarek
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Jan 13;8(1):200839. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200839. eCollection 2021 Jan.
Studies of the nonverbal correlates of deception tend to examine liars' behaviours as independent from the behaviour of the interviewer, ignoring joint action. To address this gap, experiment 1 examined the effect of telling a truth and easy, difficult and very difficult lies on nonverbal coordination. Nonverbal coordination was measured automatically by applying a dynamic time warping algorithm to motion-capture data. In experiment 2, interviewees also received instructions that influenced the attention they paid to either the nonverbal or verbal behaviour of the interviewer. Results from both experiments found that interviewer-interviewee nonverbal coordination increased with lie difficulty. This increase was not influenced by the degree to which interviewees paid attention to their nonverbal behaviour, nor by the degree of interviewer's suspicion. Our findings are consistent with the broader proposition that people rely on automated processes such as mimicry when under cognitive load.
关于欺骗的非语言关联的研究往往将说谎者的行为视为独立于采访者的行为,而忽略了联合行动。为了弥补这一差距,实验1考察了说出真话以及容易、困难和非常困难的谎言对非语言协调的影响。通过将动态时间规整算法应用于动作捕捉数据,自动测量非语言协调。在实验2中,受访者还收到了一些指示,这些指示影响了他们对采访者非语言或语言行为的关注程度。两个实验的结果都发现,采访者与受访者之间的非语言协调随着说谎难度的增加而增加。这种增加不受受访者对其非语言行为关注程度的影响,也不受采访者怀疑程度的影响。我们的研究结果与更广泛的观点一致,即人们在认知负荷下会依赖模仿等自动过程。