• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测医学合著网络中的共同作者关系。

Predicting co-author relationship in medical co-authorship networks.

作者信息

Yu Qi, Long Chao, Lv Yanhua, Shao Hongfang, He Peifeng, Duan Zhiguang

机构信息

Department of Medical Information Management, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China; School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jul 3;9(7):e101214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101214. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0101214
PMID:24991920
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4081126/
Abstract

Research collaborations are encouraged because a synergistic effect yielding good results often appears. However, creating and organizing a strong research group is a difficult task. One of the greatest concerns of an individual researcher is locating potential collaborators whose expertise complement his best. In this paper, we propose a method that makes link predictions in co-authorship networks, where topological features between authors such as Adamic/Adar, Common Neighbors, Jaccard's Coefficient, Preferential Attachment, Katzβ, and PropFlow may be good indicators of their future collaborations. Firstly, these topological features were systematically extracted from the network. Then, supervised models were used to learn the best weights associated with different topological features in deciding co-author relationships. Finally, we tested our models on the co-authorship networks in the research field of Coronary Artery Disease and obtained encouraging accuracy (the precision, recall, F1 score and AUC were, respectively, 0.696, 0.677, 0.671 and 0.742 for Logistic Regression, and respectively, 0.697, 0.678, 0.671 and 0.743 for SVM). This suggests that our models could be used to build and manage strong research groups.

摘要

鼓励开展研究合作,因为往往会产生协同效应并取得良好成果。然而,创建和组织一个强大的研究团队是一项艰巨的任务。个体研究人员最关心的问题之一是找到专业知识能与自己形成最佳互补的潜在合作者。在本文中,我们提出了一种在共同作者网络中进行链接预测的方法,其中作者之间的拓扑特征,如阿当米克/阿达指数(Adamic/Adar)、共同邻居、杰卡德系数(Jaccard's Coefficient)、优先连接、卡茨β指数(Katzβ)和传播流(PropFlow),可能是他们未来合作的良好指标。首先,从网络中系统地提取这些拓扑特征。然后,使用监督模型来学习在确定共同作者关系时与不同拓扑特征相关的最佳权重。最后,我们在冠状动脉疾病研究领域的共同作者网络上测试了我们的模型,并获得了令人鼓舞的准确率(逻辑回归的精确率、召回率、F1分数和AUC分别为0.696、0.677、0.671和0.742,支持向量机的分别为0.697、0.678、0.671和0.743)。这表明我们的模型可用于建立和管理强大的研究团队。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b2e/4081126/493206cdadb3/pone.0101214.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b2e/4081126/6e683eda195e/pone.0101214.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b2e/4081126/019281597d9a/pone.0101214.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b2e/4081126/493206cdadb3/pone.0101214.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b2e/4081126/6e683eda195e/pone.0101214.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b2e/4081126/019281597d9a/pone.0101214.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b2e/4081126/493206cdadb3/pone.0101214.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting co-author relationship in medical co-authorship networks.预测医学合著网络中的共同作者关系。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 3;9(7):e101214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101214. eCollection 2014.
2
Using Co-authorship Networks to Map and Analyse Global Neglected Tropical Disease Research with an Affiliation to Germany.利用共同作者网络绘制和分析与德国有关联的全球被忽视热带病研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Dec 31;9(12):e0004182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004182. eCollection 2015 Dec.
3
Evolution of Cooperation Patterns in Psoriasis Research: Co-Authorship Network Analysis of Papers in Medline (1942-2013).银屑病研究中合作模式的演变:Medline数据库(1942 - 2013年)论文的共同作者网络分析
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144837. eCollection 2015.
4
Can co-authorship networks be used to predict author research impact? A machine-learning based analysis within the field of degenerative cervical myelopathy research.合著网络能否用于预测作者的研究影响力?基于机器学习的退行性颈脊髓病研究领域的分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256997. eCollection 2021.
5
The evolution of your success lies at the centre of your co-authorship network.你成功的演变位于你共同作者网络的核心。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 11;10(3):e0114302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114302. eCollection 2015.
6
Mining author relationship in scholarly networks based on tripartite citation analysis.基于三方引文分析的学术网络中作者关系挖掘
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 8;12(11):e0187653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187653. eCollection 2017.
7
Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines.跨学科的多种引用指标及其综合指标
PLoS Biol. 2016 Jul 1;14(7):e1002501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002501. eCollection 2016 Jul.
8
Co-Authorship Network Analysis of Prevention Research Centers: An Exploratory Study.合作作者网络分析预防研究中心:一项探索性研究。
Public Health Rep. 2019 May/Jun;134(3):249-254. doi: 10.1177/0033354919834589. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
9
The Middle Men (And Women): Analysis of Author Collaborations Among the Top 50 Publishing Authors in Dermatology 2017-2022.中间人(以及女性):2017 - 2022年皮肤科领域排名前50的出版作者之间的作者合作分析
J Cutan Med Surg. 2023 Nov;27(6):650-652. doi: 10.1177/12034754231204863. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
10
Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use.健康研究中的共同作者网络分析:方法与潜在用途。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Apr 30;14(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0104-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Recommender for Research Collaborators Using Graph Neural Networks.一种使用图神经网络的研究合作者推荐器。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Aug 1;5:881704. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.881704. eCollection 2022.
2
Shall I Work with Them? A Knowledge Graph-Based Approach for Predicting Future Research Collaborations.我应该与他们合作吗?一种基于知识图谱的预测未来研究合作的方法。
Entropy (Basel). 2021 May 25;23(6):664. doi: 10.3390/e23060664.
3
Author Credit for Transdisciplinary Collaboration.跨学科合作的作者署名

本文引用的文献

1
Latent feature kernels for link prediction on sparse graphs.基于潜在特征核的稀疏图链路预测。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2012 Nov;23(11):1793-804. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2012.2215337.
2
Has large-scale named-entity network analysis been resting on a flawed assumption?大规模命名实体网络分析是否建立在一个有缺陷的假设之上?
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 24;8(7):e70299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070299. Print 2013.
3
A novel link prediction algorithm for reconstructing protein-protein interaction networks by topological similarity.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 16;10(9):e0137968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137968. eCollection 2015.
4
A framework to explore the knowledge structure of multidisciplinary research fields.一个探索多学科研究领域知识结构的框架。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0123537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123537. eCollection 2015.
5
Fragmented Romanian sociology: growth and structure of the collaboration network.碎片化的罗马尼亚社会学:合作网络的发展与结构
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e113271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113271. eCollection 2014.
基于拓扑相似性重建蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络的新链接预测算法。
Bioinformatics. 2013 Feb 1;29(3):355-64. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts688. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
4
Similarity index based on local paths for link prediction of complex networks.基于局部路径的相似性指标用于复杂网络的链接预测
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Oct;80(4 Pt 2):046122. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.046122. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
5
Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks.网络中的层次结构与缺失链接预测
Nature. 2008 May 1;453(7191):98-101. doi: 10.1038/nature06830.
6
The structure of scientific collaboration networks.科学合作网络的结构
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):404-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.404. Epub 2001 Jan 9.
7
Emergence of scaling in random networks.随机网络中幂律分布的出现。
Science. 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):509-12. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509.