• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与手动除颤相关的电击暴露风险。

Electrical exposure risk associated with hands-on defibrillation.

作者信息

Lemkin Daniel L, Witting Michael D, Allison Michael G, Farzad Ali, Bond Michael C, Lemkin Mark A

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2014 Oct;85(10):1330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.06.023. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.06.023
PMID:24992873
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of hands-on defibrillation (HOD) to reduce interruption of chest compression after cardiac arrest has been suggested as a means of improving resuscitation outcomes. The potential dangers of this strategy in regard to exposing rescuers to electrical energy are still being debated. This study seeks to determine the plausible worst-case energy-transfer scenario that rescuers might encounter while performing routine resuscitative measures.

METHODS

Six cadavers were acquired and prepared for defibrillation. A custom instrumentation-amplifier circuit was built to measure differential voltages at various points on the bodies. Several skin preparations were used to determine the effects of contact resistance on our voltage measurements. Resistance and exposure voltage data were acquired for a representative number of anatomic landmarks and were used to map rescuers' voltage exposure. A formula for rescuer-received dose (RRD) was derived to represent the proportion of energy the rescuer could receive from a shock delivered to a patient. We used cadaver measurements to estimate a range of RRD.

RESULTS

Defibrillation resulted in rescuer exposure voltages ranging from 827V to ∼200V, depending on cadaver and anatomic location. The RRD under the test scenarios ranged from 1 to 8J, which is in excess of accepted energy exposure levels.

CONCLUSIONS

HOD using currently available personal protective equipment and resuscitative procedures poses a risk to rescuers. The process should be considered potentially dangerous until equipment and techniques that will protect rescuers are developed.

摘要

背景

有人提出采用手动除颤(HOD)来减少心脏骤停后胸外按压的中断,以此作为改善复苏效果的一种手段。然而,这种策略在使救援人员暴露于电能方面的潜在危险仍在争论之中。本研究旨在确定救援人员在进行常规复苏措施时可能遇到的最糟糕的能量转移情况。

方法

获取6具尸体并为除颤做准备。构建了一个定制的仪器放大器电路,用于测量身体不同部位的差分电压。使用了几种皮肤处理方法来确定接触电阻对我们电压测量的影响。获取了代表数量的解剖标志点的电阻和暴露电压数据,并用于绘制救援人员的电压暴露情况。推导出了救援人员接受剂量(RRD)的公式,以表示救援人员从施加于患者的电击可能接收能量的比例。我们使用尸体测量数据来估计RRD的范围。

结果

根据尸体和解剖位置的不同,除颤导致救援人员的暴露电压范围为827V至约200V。测试场景下的RRD范围为1至8焦耳,超过了公认的能量暴露水平。

结论

使用现有个人防护设备和复苏程序进行HOD会对救援人员构成风险。在开发出能保护救援人员的设备和技术之前,应认为该过程存在潜在危险。

相似文献

1
Electrical exposure risk associated with hands-on defibrillation.与手动除颤相关的电击暴露风险。
Resuscitation. 2014 Oct;85(10):1330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.06.023. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
2
Hands-on defibrillation: an analysis of electrical current flow through rescuers in direct contact with patients during biphasic external defibrillation.手动除颤:双相体外除颤期间通过直接接触患者的施救者的电流分析
Circulation. 2008 May 13;117(19):2510-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.763011. Epub 2008 May 5.
3
Will medical examination gloves protect rescuers from defibrillation voltages during hands-on defibrillation?在进行徒手除颤时,医用检查手套能否保护救援人员免受除颤电压的伤害?
Resuscitation. 2012 Dec;83(12):1467-72. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.031. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
4
Achieving safe hands-on defibrillation using electrical safety gloves--a clinical evaluation.使用电安全手套实现安全的手动除颤——一项临床评估。
Resuscitation. 2015 May;90:163-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.12.028. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
5
Electrical injury during "hands on" defibrillation-A potential risk of internal cardioverter defibrillators?“手动”除颤过程中的电击伤——植入式心脏复律除颤器的潜在风险?
Resuscitation. 2009 Jul;80(7):832-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.04.010. Epub 2009 May 14.
6
Overestimated electrical exposure risk associated with hands-on defibrillation?与手动除颤相关的电暴露风险是否被高估?
Resuscitation. 2015 Jul;92:e15. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.037. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
7
Reply to Letter: "Overestimated electrical exposure risk associated with hands-on defibrillation?".对信件《与手动除颤相关的电暴露风险是否被高估?》的回复
Resuscitation. 2015 Jul;92:e17-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 May 9.
8
Hands-on defibrillation during active chest compressions: eliminating another interruption.在进行有效的胸外按压时进行手动除颤:消除另一种中断情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;34(11):2172-2176. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.08.017. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
9
Hands-on defibrillation: theoretical and practical aspects of patient and rescuer safety.动手除颤:患者和施救者安全的理论和实践方面。
Resuscitation. 2012 May;83(5):551-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.11.005. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
10
Is external defibrillation an electric threat for bystanders?体外除颤对旁观者来说是一种电气威胁吗?
Resuscitation. 2009 Apr;80(4):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during spaceflight - a guideline for CPR in microgravity from the German Society of Aerospace Medicine (DGLRM) and the European Society of Aerospace Medicine Space Medicine Group (ESAM-SMG).心肺复苏术(CPR)在太空飞行中的应用——德国航空航天医学学会(DGLRM)和欧洲航空航天医学学会太空医学小组(ESAM-SMG)关于微重力下 CPR 的指南。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Nov 2;28(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00793-y.
2
Hospital resuscitation teams: a review of the risks to the healthcare worker.医院复苏团队:对医护人员风险的综述
J Intensive Care. 2017 Oct 11;5:59. doi: 10.1186/s40560-017-0253-9. eCollection 2017.
3
Assessing student paramedic visual and verbal checks for defibrillation safety-an observational study.
评估护理专业学生对除颤安全性的视觉和口头检查——一项观察性研究。
Springerplus. 2015 Dec 14;4:773. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1570-x. eCollection 2015.