Vindigni Stephen M, Lessing Juan N, Carlbom David J
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356424, Seattle, WA 98195-6424 USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, 13001 E 17th Place, Aurora, CO 80045 USA.
J Intensive Care. 2017 Oct 11;5:59. doi: 10.1186/s40560-017-0253-9. eCollection 2017.
"Code blue" events and related resuscitation efforts involve multidisciplinary bedside teams that implement specialized interventions aimed at patient revival. Activities include performing effective chest compressions, assessing and restoring a perfusing cardiac rhythm, stabilizing the airway, and treating the underlying cause of the arrest. While the existing critical care literature has appropriately focused on the patient, there has been a dearth of information discussing the various stresses to the healthcare team. This review summarizes the available literature regarding occupational risks to medical emergency teams, characterizes these risks, offers preventive strategies to healthcare workers, and highlights further research needs.
We performed a literature search of PubMed for English articles of all types (randomized controlled trials, case-control and cohort studies, case reports and series, editorials and commentaries) through September 22, 2016, discussing potential occupational hazards during resuscitation scenarios. Of the 6266 articles reviewed, 73 relevant articles were included.
The literature search identified six potential occupational risk categories to members of the resuscitation team-infectious, electrical, musculoskeletal, chemical, irradiative, and psychological. Retrieved articles were reviewed in detail by the authors.
Overall, we found there is limited evidence detailing the risks to healthcare workers performing resuscitation. We identify these risks and offer potential solutions. There are clearly numerous opportunities for further study in this field.
“蓝色急救代码”事件及相关复苏工作涉及多学科床边团队,他们实施旨在使患者复苏的专门干预措施。活动包括进行有效的胸外按压、评估并恢复灌注性心律、稳定气道以及治疗心脏骤停的潜在病因。虽然现有的重症护理文献已适当地聚焦于患者,但缺乏讨论医疗团队所面临各种压力的信息。本综述总结了关于医疗急救团队职业风险的现有文献,描述这些风险的特征,为医护人员提供预防策略,并强调进一步的研究需求。
我们在PubMed上检索截至2016年9月22日的所有类型的英文文章(随机对照试验、病例对照和队列研究、病例报告及系列、社论和评论),讨论复苏场景中的潜在职业危害。在审查的6266篇文章中,纳入了73篇相关文章。
文献检索确定了复苏团队成员面临的六个潜在职业风险类别——感染性、电气性、肌肉骨骼性、化学性、辐射性和心理性。作者对检索到的文章进行了详细审查。
总体而言,我们发现详细说明进行复苏的医护人员所面临风险的证据有限。我们识别了这些风险并提供了潜在的解决方案。该领域显然有许多进一步研究的机会。