Kreuzer Peter M, Landgrebe Michael, Resch Markus, Husser Oliver, Schecklmann Martin, Geisreiter Florian, Poeppl Timm B, Prasser Sarah J, Hajak Goeran, Rupprecht Rainer, Langguth Berthold
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Universitaetsstr. 84, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, kbo Lech-Mangfall-Klinik Agatharied, Germany.
Brain Stimul. 2014 Sep-Oct;7(5):740-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
OBJECTIVES: Vagus nerve stimulation represents an established treatment strategy for epilepsy and affective disorders. Recently, positive effects were also shown in animals and humans with tinnitus. Here we report the results of an open pilot study exploring feasibility, safety and efficacy of tVNS in the treatment of chronic tinnitus. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty patients with chronic tinnitus underwent tVNS in an open single-armed pilot study which was conducted in two phases applying two different stimulating devices (Cerbomed CM02 and NEMOS). Clinical assessment was based on Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), WHO Quality of Life, and various numeric rating scales. Primary outcome was defined as change in TQ (baseline vs. final visit in week 24). The study has been registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01176734). RESULTS: Primary analysis indicated mean TQ reductions of 3.7 points (phase 1) and 2.8 points (phase 2) significant for the first study phase. Secondary analyses indicated a significant BDI reduction for phase 1 (uncorrected for multiple testing), but no further systematic or significant effects. Adverse events included twitching and pressure at electrode placement site. The occurrence of one hospitalization because of palpations and the development of a left bundle branch block were considered as unrelated to the intervention. Cognitive testing revealed no significant changes. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate the feasibility of tVNS over a period of 6 months. There was no clinically relevant improvement of tinnitus complaints. Our data suggest tVNS to be considered safe in patients without a history of cardiac disease.
目的:迷走神经刺激是癫痫和情感障碍的既定治疗策略。最近,在患有耳鸣的动物和人类中也显示出了积极效果。在此,我们报告一项开放性试点研究的结果,该研究探索经皮迷走神经刺激(tVNS)治疗慢性耳鸣的可行性、安全性和有效性。 研究设计:在一项开放性单臂试点研究中,50例慢性耳鸣患者接受了tVNS治疗,该研究分两个阶段进行,使用两种不同的刺激装置(Cerbomed CM02和NEMOS)。临床评估基于耳鸣问卷(TQ)、耳鸣障碍量表(THI)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、世界卫生组织生活质量量表以及各种数字评定量表。主要结局定义为TQ的变化(基线与第24周最后一次就诊时相比)。该研究已在clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT01176734)。 结果:初步分析表明,第一个研究阶段TQ平均降低3.7分(第一阶段)和2.8分(第二阶段),具有统计学意义。次要分析表明,第一阶段BDI有显著降低(未进行多重检验校正),但没有进一步的系统性或显著效果。不良事件包括电极放置部位的抽搐和压迫感。1例因心悸住院以及出现左束支传导阻滞被认为与干预无关。认知测试未发现显著变化。 结论:我们的数据证明了tVNS在6个月期间的可行性。耳鸣症状在临床上没有得到相关改善。我们的数据表明,对于没有心脏病史的患者,tVNS被认为是安全的。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2013-4
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015-10
Front Psychiatry. 2012-8-7
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-6-19
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025-1-17
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024-10
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023-7-6
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023-1-18