Suppr超能文献

不同病理生理机制的勃起功能障碍患者简化版国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)的比较。

Comparison of the simplified International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) in patients of erectile dysfunction with different pathophysiologies.

作者信息

Tang Zhengyan, Li Dongjie, Zhang Xiaobo, Yi Lu, Zhu Xiangsheng, Zeng Xiangyang, Tang Yuxin

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2014 Jul 5;14:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-52.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The simplified International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) is a convenient, reliable and validated diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction (ED). However, few studies focused on IIEF-5 in ED patients with different pathophysiological causes. ,We aim to compare the IIEF-5 score among ED patients with specific pathophysiologies in this study.

METHODS

The IIEF-5 score of 3,327 ED patients (median age 39 years) was analyzed. The primary causes of ED were determined by comprehensive diagnostic procedures in the urology/andrology clinics in five training hospitals. Patients with uncertain pathophysiologic cause were excluded.

RESULTS

176 patients were excluded, 3151 patients with ED history between 0.5 year and 20 years, were enrolled. The causes of ED was classified as psychogenic (59.2%), vasoculogenic (21.3%), neurogenic (4.1%), anatomical/structural (2.8%), hormonal (7.1%) or drug-induced (5.5%). A significant difference was detected in the median IIEF-5 score between psychogenic ED and organic ED (15 (IQR 13, 17) versus 12 (IQR 9.5, 14.5), P < 0.001). There was no significant difference of IIEF-5 scores among the organic groups (P = 0.073), or between arteriogenic and venogenic groups (13 (IQR 10.5, 15.5) versus 13 (IQR 11-15), P = 0.912 (adjusted α = 0.017)). However, the median IIEF-5 score of those with a mixed vascular cause was the lowest among vasculogenic patients (11 (IQR 8.5-13.5), scores for the three groups: P = 0.003.).

CONCLUSIONS

The IIEF-5 scores of men with psychological ED are higher than those with organic causes, but there is no difference among patients with different organic pathophysiologies. Our data indicate that IIEF-5 is not a definitive diagnostic tool to discriminate the pathophysiological causes of ED.

摘要

背景

简化版国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)是一种用于诊断勃起功能障碍(ED)的便捷、可靠且经过验证的工具。然而,很少有研究关注不同病理生理原因的ED患者的IIEF-5情况。在本研究中,我们旨在比较特定病理生理类型的ED患者的IIEF-5评分。

方法

分析了3327例ED患者(中位年龄39岁)的IIEF-5评分。ED的主要病因通过五家培训医院泌尿外科/男科门诊的综合诊断程序确定。排除病理生理原因不明的患者。

结果

排除176例患者,纳入3151例有0.5年至20年ED病史的患者。ED的病因分为心理性(59.2%)、血管性(21.3%)、神经性(4.1%)、解剖/结构性(2.8%)、激素性(7.1%)或药物性(5.5%)。心理性ED和器质性ED患者的IIEF-5评分中位数存在显著差异(分别为15(四分位间距13,17)和12(四分位间距9.5,14.5),P<0.001)。器质性组之间的IIEF-5评分无显著差异(P = 0.073),动脉性和静脉性组之间也无显著差异(分别为13(四分位间距10.5,15.5)和13(四分位间距11 - 15),P = 0.912(校正α = 0.017))。然而,血管性病因中混合血管病因患者的IIEF-5评分中位数在血管性患者中最低(11(四分位间距8.5 - 13.5),三组评分比较:P = 0.003)。

结论

心理性ED男性的IIEF-5评分高于器质性病因者,但不同器质性病理生理类型的患者之间无差异。我们的数据表明,IIEF-5并非区分ED病理生理病因的确定性诊断工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0af4/4094415/43d43d53bde9/1471-2490-14-52-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验