• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科医院出院时为改善药学服务进行前瞻性风险分析和事件报告。

Prospective risk analysis and incident reporting for better pharmaceutical care at paediatric hospital discharge.

作者信息

Kaestli Laure-Zoé, Cingria Laurence, Fonzo-Christe Caroline, Bonnabry Pascal

机构信息

Pharmacy, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland,

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Oct;36(5):953-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9977-y. Epub 2014 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-014-9977-y
PMID:24997014
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discharging patients from hospital is a complex multidisciplinary process that can lead to non-compliance and medication-related problems.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate risks of discontinuity of pharmaceutical care at paediatric hospital discharge and assess potential improvement strategies, using two complementary methods: a prospective risk analysis and a spontaneous incident reporting system.

SETTING

Geneva University hospitals and community pharmacies.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team analysed the paediatric medication discharge process applying the failure modes (FM), effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA), using ibuprofen, morphine, valganciclovir as model drugs. Over 46 months, incidents with discharge prescriptions, reported by community pharmacists, were classified according to FMECA's FM.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

FM, criticality indexes (CI), incidents.

RESULTS

Twenty-four FM were identified. The highest criticality scores were given for prescribing the wrong dosage [mean criticality index (CI = 205)], early treatment discontinuation by the patient (CI = 195), and continuation of contraindicated treatment by the general practitioner (CI = 191). Implementation of eight improvement strategies covering the eight most critical FM led to a 64 % reduction in criticality scores (CI 496 vs 1,392). Improvement of the computerized-physician-order-entry system was the single most effective strategy (CI 843 vs 1,392). Only 52 incidents were spontaneously reported (17 for paediatric patients). Paediatric problems most frequently reported (lack of information, 35 %; delay in drug supply, 18 %) were consistent with the highest frequencies scored by FMECA.

CONCLUSION

Spontaneous incident reporting leads to high levels of under-reporting, but highlighted similar problems at paediatric hospital discharge to FMECA. Using FMECA allowed estimations of criticalities at each step and the potential impact of safety improvement strategies. Proactive and reactive methods proved complementary and would help to set up effective targeted improvement strategies to improve medication process at paediatric hospital discharge.

摘要

背景

患者出院是一个复杂的多学科过程,可能导致不依从和药物相关问题。

目的

采用两种互补方法,即前瞻性风险分析和自发事件报告系统,评估儿科医院出院时药学服务中断的风险,并评估潜在的改进策略。

地点

日内瓦大学医院和社区药房。

方法

一个多学科团队应用失效模式(FM)、效应及关键性分析(FMECA)对儿科药物出院流程进行分析,以布洛芬、吗啡、缬更昔洛韦作为模型药物。在46个月的时间里,社区药剂师报告的出院处方事件按照FMECA的FM进行分类。

主要观察指标

FM、关键性指数(CI)、事件。

结果

识别出24种FM。错误剂量处方(平均关键性指数[CI = 205])、患者过早停药(CI = 195)以及全科医生继续使用禁忌治疗(CI = 191)的关键性得分最高。针对八个最关键的FM实施八项改进策略,使关键性得分降低了64%(CI从496降至1392)。改进计算机化医生医嘱录入系统是最有效的单一策略(CI从843降至1392)。仅自发报告了52起事件(儿科患者17起)。最常报告的儿科问题(信息缺失,35%;药物供应延迟,18%)与FMECA得分最高的频率一致。

结论

自发事件报告导致报告严重不足,但凸显了与FMECA在儿科医院出院时类似的问题。使用FMECA能够估计每个步骤的关键性以及安全改进策略的潜在影响。主动和被动方法证明具有互补性,有助于制定有效的针对性改进策略,以改善儿科医院出院时的用药流程。

相似文献

1
Prospective risk analysis and incident reporting for better pharmaceutical care at paediatric hospital discharge.儿科医院出院时为改善药学服务进行前瞻性风险分析和事件报告。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Oct;36(5):953-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9977-y. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
2
Use of a systematic risk analysis method to improve safety in the production of paediatric parenteral nutrition solutions.使用系统风险分析方法提高儿科肠外营养制剂生产的安全性。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Apr;14(2):93-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.007914.
3
Use of a prospective risk analysis method to improve the safety of the cancer chemotherapy process.使用前瞻性风险分析方法提高癌症化疗过程的安全性。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Feb;18(1):9-16. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi082. Epub 2005 Nov 7.
4
Profile of prescribing errors detected by clinical pharmacists in paediatric hospitals in Spain.西班牙儿科医院临床药师发现的处方错误概况。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Aug;35(4):638-46. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9785-9. Epub 2013 May 25.
5
An evaluation of paediatric medicines reconciliation at hospital discharge into the community.一项关于儿科药物在出院进入社区时的核对情况的评估。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2016 May;24(3):196-202. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12229. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
6
Detection and correct handling of prescribing errors in Dutch hospital pharmacies using test patients.使用测试患者检测和正确处理荷兰医院药房的处方错误。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Dec;35(6):1188-202. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9848-y. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
7
Risk and pharmacoeconomic analyses of the injectable medication process in the paediatric and neonatal intensive care units.儿科和新生儿重症监护病房注射药物流程的风险和药物经济学分析。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Jun;22(3):170-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq015. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
8
Medication safety incidents in paediatric oncology after electronic medication management system implementation.电子医嘱管理系统实施后儿科肿瘤的用药安全事件。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Nov;28(6):e13152. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13152. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
9
Use of failure mode, effect and criticality analysis to improve safety in the medication administration process.运用失效模式、效应及危害性分析来提高用药过程的安全性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Aug;21(4):549-59. doi: 10.1111/jep.12314. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
10
Retrospective analysis of medication incidents reported using an on-line reporting system.对使用在线报告系统报告的用药事件进行回顾性分析。
Pharm World Sci. 2006 Dec;28(6):359-65. doi: 10.1007/s11096-006-9040-8. Epub 2006 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to improve medication safety in the dispensing process - a study at a teaching hospital, Sri Lanka.失效模式与影响分析(FMEA)在配药过程中提高用药安全性的应用——斯里兰卡一所教学医院的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 20;21(1):1430. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11369-5.
2
Using risk analysis to ensure patients' medication safety during hospital relocations and evacuations.利用风险分析确保医院搬迁和疏散期间患者的用药安全。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e171-e179. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002619. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
3
[Not Available].

本文引用的文献

1
An evaluation of departmental radiation oncology incident reports: anticipating a national reporting system.评估部门放射肿瘤学事故报告:期待国家报告系统。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 15;85(4):919-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.013. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
2
Reasons for not reporting patient safety incidents in general practice: a qualitative study.未报告全科医疗中患者安全事件的原因:一项定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012 Dec;30(4):199-205. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2012.732469. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
3
"It's like two worlds apart": an analysis of vulnerable patient handover practices at discharge from hospital.
[无可用内容]。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Nov-Dec;71(6):376-384. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
4
Factors contributing to medication errors made when using computerized order entry in pediatrics: a systematic review.导致儿科计算机医嘱录入中用药错误的因素:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):575-584. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx124.
“宛如两个截然不同的世界”:对医院出院时弱势患者交接流程的分析
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i67-75. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001174. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
4
Failure mode and effects analysis outputs: are they valid?失效模式与影响分析输出:它们有效吗?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 10;12:150. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-150.
5
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis: views of hospital staff in the UK.失效模式与影响分析:英国医院员工的观点。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Jan;17(1):37-43. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011031. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
6
Leading clinical handover improvement: a change strategy to implement best practices in the acute care setting.引领临床交接班改进:在急症护理环境中实施最佳实践的变革策略。
J Patient Saf. 2011 Mar;7(1):11-8. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e31820c98a8.
7
A practical guide to failure mode and effects analysis in health care: making the most of the team and its meetings.医疗保健领域失效模式与效应分析实用指南:充分利用团队及其会议
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 Aug;36(8):351-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36053-3.
8
Risk and pharmacoeconomic analyses of the injectable medication process in the paediatric and neonatal intensive care units.儿科和新生儿重症监护病房注射药物流程的风险和药物经济学分析。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Jun;22(3):170-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq015. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
9
Improving measurement in clinical handover.改善临床交接班中的信息传递。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Aug;18(4):272-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024570.
10
Incidence, preventability, and impact of Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) and potential ADEs in hospitalized children in New Zealand: a prospective observational cohort study.新西兰住院儿童药物不良事件(ADEs)及潜在ADEs的发生率、可预防性和影响:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
Paediatr Drugs. 2009;11(2):153-60. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200911020-00005.