• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using risk analysis to ensure patients' medication safety during hospital relocations and evacuations.利用风险分析确保医院搬迁和疏散期间患者的用药安全。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e171-e179. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002619. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
2
Using risk analysis to anticipate and mitigate failures during a hospital pharmacy relocation.利用风险分析在医院药房搬迁过程中预测和减轻故障。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e164-e170. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002525. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
3
Evacuation after a nuclear accident: Critical reviews of past nuclear accidents and proposal for future planning.核事故后人员撤离:对过去核事故的批判性回顾与未来规划建议。
Environ Int. 2021 Mar;148:106379. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106379. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
4
Use of failure mode, effect and criticality analysis to improve safety in the medication administration process.运用失效模式、效应及危害性分析来提高用药过程的安全性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Aug;21(4):549-59. doi: 10.1111/jep.12314. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
5
Evacuation of Intensive Care Units During Disaster: Learning From the Hurricane Sandy Experience.灾难期间重症监护病房的撤离:从桑迪飓风的经历中学习
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016 Feb;10(1):20-7. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2015.94. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
6
Use of a risk assessment method to improve the safety of negative pressure wound therapy.使用风险评估方法提高负压伤口治疗的安全性。
Int Wound J. 2014 Jun;11(3):253-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01081.x. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
7
Prospective risk analysis and incident reporting for better pharmaceutical care at paediatric hospital discharge.儿科医院出院时为改善药学服务进行前瞻性风险分析和事件报告。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Oct;36(5):953-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9977-y. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
8
Risk Analysis by Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis and Biosafety Management During Collective Air Medical Evacuation of Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.2019年冠状病毒病危重症患者集体空中医疗后送期间的失效模式、影响及危害性分析风险分析与生物安全管理
Air Med J. 2022 Jan-Feb;41(1):88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
9
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Nov-Dec;71(6):376-384. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
10
Counting crises: US hospital evacuations, 1971-1999.危机统计:1971 - 1999年美国医院疏散情况
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004 Apr-Jun;19(2):150-7. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00001667.

本文引用的文献

1
Using risk analysis to anticipate and mitigate failures during a hospital pharmacy relocation.利用风险分析在医院药房搬迁过程中预测和减轻故障。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e164-e170. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002525. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
2
ASHP Guidelines on Preventing Medication Errors in Hospitals.美国卫生系统药师协会医院预防用药错误指南。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Oct 1;75(19):1493-1517. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170811.
3
Clinical pharmacy services in the emergency department.急诊科的临床药学服务。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;36(10):1727-1732. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.056. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
It Takes a Village to Move a Hospital: Simulation Improves Intensive Care Team Preparedness for a Move to a New Site.搬迁医院需要众人协作:模拟演练提升重症监护团队对迁至新址的准备程度。
Hosp Pediatr. 2018 Mar;8(3):148-156. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2017-0112. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
5
Proactive Risk Mitigation: Using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for Evaluating Vascular Access.主动风险缓解:使用失效模式与效应分析评估血管通路
J Healthc Qual. 2018 Jan/Feb;40(1):58-65. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000125.
6
The relocation and road transfer of intensive care patients to a new hospital in Bristol: Our experiences.重症监护患者转院并通过道路转运至布里斯托尔一家新医院:我们的经验。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 Nov;17(4):326-331. doi: 10.1177/1751143716644460. Epub 2016 May 12.
7
Disaster Preparedness among Health Professionals and Support Staff: What is Effective? An Integrative Literature Review.卫生专业人员和辅助人员的灾难准备:什么是有效的?一项综合文献综述。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Jun;32(3):321-328. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1700019X. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
8
Use of failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) to improve medication management process.运用失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)改善药物管理流程。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Mar 13;30(2):175-186. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2015-0113.
9
Development of an Evacuation Tool to Facilitate Disaster Preparedness: Use in a Planned Evacuation to Support a Hospital Move.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017 Aug;11(4):479-486. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2016.154. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
10
Moving a hospital: simulation - a way to co-produce safety healthcare facilities.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2017 Dec;23(4):589-591. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2016.1270543. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

利用风险分析确保医院搬迁和疏散期间患者的用药安全。

Using risk analysis to ensure patients' medication safety during hospital relocations and evacuations.

机构信息

Pharmacy of Eastern Vaud Hospitals, Rennaz, Switzerland.

Specialised Centre for Emergency and Disaster Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e171-e179. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002619. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002619
PMID:33832916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8640418/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To ensure patient safety and the preparedness of medication processes during hospital relocations and evacuations by using Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA).

METHODS

The relocation of six regional hospitals to a single building, resulting in 400 beds being moved, could be compared with an emergency evacuation. An FMECA was performed on the hospital group's internal medicine and intensive care units (IMU and ICU), examining how medication processes would be affected by a hospital relocation or evacuation.

RESULTS

We identified 59 hospital relocation and 68 evacuation failure modes. Failure modes were ranked based on their criticality index (CI; range 1-810). The higher the CI, the greater the patient-related risk. Average initial IMU and ICU hospital relocation CI scores were 160 (range 105-294) and 201 (range 125-343), respectively, subsequently reduced to 32 (-80%) and 49 (-76%) after mitigation measures. Average initial IMU and ICU evacuation CI scores were 319 (range 245-504) and 592 (range 441-810), respectively, subsequently reduced to 194 (-39%) and 282 (-52%). Most mitigation measures (17/22), such as for example checklists, could be implemented in both situations. Due to their unpredictable nature, five measures were specific to evacuation situations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the value of using an FMECA on medication processes to anticipate potential negative impacts on patient safety during hospital relocations or evacuations. Preparation for a hospital relocation can provide useful knowledge and an opportunity to test mitigation measures that might prove useful in evacuations.

摘要

目的

通过使用失效模式、影响和临界性分析(FMECA),确保医院搬迁和疏散过程中的患者安全和用药流程准备。

方法

六家地区医院搬迁到一栋大楼,导致 400 张床位转移,可以与紧急疏散进行比较。对医院内科和重症监护病房(IMU 和 ICU)进行了 FMECA,研究了医院搬迁或疏散如何影响用药流程。

结果

我们确定了 59 种医院搬迁和 68 种疏散失效模式。根据临界指数(CI;范围 1-810)对失效模式进行排名。CI 越高,与患者相关的风险越大。初始内科和重症监护病房医院搬迁的平均 CI 分数分别为 160(范围 105-294)和 201(范围 125-343),随后通过缓解措施降低至 32(-80%)和 49(-76%)。初始内科和重症监护病房疏散的平均 CI 分数分别为 319(范围 245-504)和 592(范围 441-810),随后通过缓解措施降低至 194(-39%)和 282(-52%)。大多数缓解措施(17/22),例如检查表,都可以在两种情况下实施。由于其不可预测性,有五项措施专门针对疏散情况。

结论

本研究强调了在医院搬迁或疏散过程中使用 FMECA 对用药流程进行分析,以预测对患者安全的潜在负面影响的价值。为医院搬迁做准备可以提供有用的知识,并为测试缓解措施提供机会,这些措施在疏散中可能有用。