Pharmacy of Eastern Vaud Hospitals, Rennaz, Switzerland.
Specialised Centre for Emergency and Disaster Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e171-e179. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002619. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
To ensure patient safety and the preparedness of medication processes during hospital relocations and evacuations by using Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA).
The relocation of six regional hospitals to a single building, resulting in 400 beds being moved, could be compared with an emergency evacuation. An FMECA was performed on the hospital group's internal medicine and intensive care units (IMU and ICU), examining how medication processes would be affected by a hospital relocation or evacuation.
We identified 59 hospital relocation and 68 evacuation failure modes. Failure modes were ranked based on their criticality index (CI; range 1-810). The higher the CI, the greater the patient-related risk. Average initial IMU and ICU hospital relocation CI scores were 160 (range 105-294) and 201 (range 125-343), respectively, subsequently reduced to 32 (-80%) and 49 (-76%) after mitigation measures. Average initial IMU and ICU evacuation CI scores were 319 (range 245-504) and 592 (range 441-810), respectively, subsequently reduced to 194 (-39%) and 282 (-52%). Most mitigation measures (17/22), such as for example checklists, could be implemented in both situations. Due to their unpredictable nature, five measures were specific to evacuation situations.
This study highlights the value of using an FMECA on medication processes to anticipate potential negative impacts on patient safety during hospital relocations or evacuations. Preparation for a hospital relocation can provide useful knowledge and an opportunity to test mitigation measures that might prove useful in evacuations.
通过使用失效模式、影响和临界性分析(FMECA),确保医院搬迁和疏散过程中的患者安全和用药流程准备。
六家地区医院搬迁到一栋大楼,导致 400 张床位转移,可以与紧急疏散进行比较。对医院内科和重症监护病房(IMU 和 ICU)进行了 FMECA,研究了医院搬迁或疏散如何影响用药流程。
我们确定了 59 种医院搬迁和 68 种疏散失效模式。根据临界指数(CI;范围 1-810)对失效模式进行排名。CI 越高,与患者相关的风险越大。初始内科和重症监护病房医院搬迁的平均 CI 分数分别为 160(范围 105-294)和 201(范围 125-343),随后通过缓解措施降低至 32(-80%)和 49(-76%)。初始内科和重症监护病房疏散的平均 CI 分数分别为 319(范围 245-504)和 592(范围 441-810),随后通过缓解措施降低至 194(-39%)和 282(-52%)。大多数缓解措施(17/22),例如检查表,都可以在两种情况下实施。由于其不可预测性,有五项措施专门针对疏散情况。
本研究强调了在医院搬迁或疏散过程中使用 FMECA 对用药流程进行分析,以预测对患者安全的潜在负面影响的价值。为医院搬迁做准备可以提供有用的知识,并为测试缓解措施提供机会,这些措施在疏散中可能有用。