Inamoto Yoshihiro, Martin Paul J, Storer Barry E, Palmer Jeanne, Weisdorf Daniel J, Pidala Joseph, Flowers Mary E D, Arora Mukta, Jagasia Madan, Arai Sally, Chai Xiaoyu, Pavletic Steven Z, Vogelsang Georgia B, Lee Stephanie J
Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Haematologica. 2014 Oct;99(10):1618-23. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.109611. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
The National Institutes of Health global score for chronic graft-versus-host disease was devised by experts but was not based on empirical data. We hypothesized that analysis of prospectively collected data would enable derivation of a more accurate model for estimating mortality risk. We analyzed 574 adult patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease enrolled in a multicenter, observational study, using multivariate time-varying analysis accounting for serial changes in severity of involvement of eight individual organ sites over time. In the training set, severity of skin, mouth, gastrointestinal tract, liver and lung involvement were independently associated with the risk of non-relapse mortality. Weighted mortality points were assigned to individual organs based on the hazard ratios and were summed. The population was divided into three risk groups based on the total mortality points. The three new risk groups were validated in an independent validation set, but did not show better discriminative performance than the National Institutes of Health global score. As compared to a moderate or mild global score, a severe global score was associated with increased risks of non-relapse and overall mortality across time but not with a decreased risk of recurrent malignancy. The National Institutes of Health global score predicts patients' mortality risk throughout the course of their chronic graft-versus-host disease. Further research is required in order to improve outcomes in patients with severe chronic graft-versus-host disease, since their risk of mortality remains elevated.
美国国立卫生研究院制定的慢性移植物抗宿主病全球评分是由专家完成的,但并非基于实证数据。我们推测,对前瞻性收集的数据进行分析将能够得出一个更准确的模型来估计死亡风险。我们分析了574例纳入多中心观察性研究的成年慢性移植物抗宿主病患者,采用多变量时变分析,该分析考虑了八个个体器官部位受累严重程度随时间的连续变化。在训练集中,皮肤、口腔、胃肠道、肝脏和肺部受累的严重程度与非复发死亡率风险独立相关。根据风险比为各个器官分配加权死亡点数并求和。根据总死亡点数将人群分为三个风险组。这三个新的风险组在一个独立的验证集中得到了验证,但与美国国立卫生研究院全球评分相比,并未显示出更好的判别性能。与中度或轻度全球评分相比,重度全球评分在整个时间段内与非复发和总死亡率风险增加相关,但与复发性恶性肿瘤风险降低无关。美国国立卫生研究院全球评分可预测慢性移植物抗宿主病患者整个病程中的死亡风险。由于严重慢性移植物抗宿主病患者的死亡风险仍然很高,因此需要进一步研究以改善他们的治疗结果。