• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务相关性效应对脑电生理活动的影响:早期的,而不是最初的。

Task relevance effects in electrophysiological brain activity: early, but not first.

机构信息

Laboratory of Cognitive Neurorehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

Laboratory of Cognitive Neurorehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.059. Epub 2014 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.059
PMID:24997280
Abstract

A current controversy surrounds the question whether high-level features of a stimulus such as its relevance to the current task may affect early attentional processes. According to one view abruptly appearing stimuli gain priority during an initial feedforward processing stage and therefore capture attention even if they are irrelevant to the task. Alternatively, only stimuli that share a relevant property with the target may capture attention of the observer. Here, we used high-density EEG to test whether task relevance may modulate early feedforward brain activity, or whether it only becomes effective once the physical characteristics of the stimulus have been processed. We manipulated task relevance and visual saliency of distracters presented left or right of an upcoming central target. We found that only the relevance of distracters had an effect on manual reaction times to the target. However, the analysis of electrocortical activity revealed three discrete processing stages during which pure effects of distracter saliency (80-160 ms), followed by an interaction between saliency and relevance (130-240 ms) and finally pure effects of relevance (~230-370 ms) were observed. Electrical sources of early saliency effects and later relevance effects were localized in the posterior parietal cortex, predominantly over the right hemisphere. These findings support the view that during the initial feedforward stage only physical (bottom-up) factors determine cortical responses to visual stimuli, while top-down effects interfere at later processing stages.

摘要

当前,一个争议围绕着这样一个问题:刺激的高级特征,例如与当前任务的相关性,是否会影响早期的注意力过程。根据一种观点,在初始前馈处理阶段,突然出现的刺激会获得优先权,因此即使它们与任务无关,也会吸引注意力。或者,只有与目标具有相关属性的刺激才能吸引观察者的注意力。在这里,我们使用高密度 EEG 来测试任务相关性是否可以调节早期的前馈脑活动,或者它是否仅在刺激的物理特征被处理后才有效。我们操纵了分心物的任务相关性和视觉显著性,这些分心物出现在即将出现的中央目标的左侧或右侧。我们发现,只有分心物的相关性对目标的手动反应时间有影响。然而,对脑电活动的分析揭示了三个离散的处理阶段,在这些阶段中,分心物的显著性(80-160ms),随后是显著性和相关性之间的相互作用(130-240ms),最后是相关性的纯效应(~230-370ms)。早期显著性效应和后期相关性效应的电生理源定位于后顶叶皮层,主要在右半球。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即在初始前馈阶段,只有物理(自下而上)因素决定了皮质对视觉刺激的反应,而自上而下的效应则在后期处理阶段干扰。

相似文献

1
Task relevance effects in electrophysiological brain activity: early, but not first.任务相关性效应对脑电生理活动的影响:早期的,而不是最初的。
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.059. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
2
Effects of attention and arousal on early responses in striate cortex.注意力和觉醒对纹状皮层早期反应的影响。
Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jul;22(1):225-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04181.x.
3
Selecting category specific visual information: Top-down and bottom-up control of object based attention.选择特定类别的视觉信息:基于对象注意的自上而下和自下而上控制。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Sep;35:330-41. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
4
Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.知觉负载影响空间和非空间视觉选择过程:一项事件相关脑电位研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):2071-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
5
Neurophysiological markers of alert responding during goal-directed behavior: a high-density electrical mapping study.目标导向行为中警觉反应的神经生理标志物:一项高密度脑电图研究。
Neuroimage. 2005 Sep;27(3):587-601. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.044.
6
Attentional load asymmetrically affects early electrophysiological indices of visual orienting.注意负荷不对称地影响视觉定向的早期电生理指标。
Cereb Cortex. 2011 May;21(5):1056-65. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq178. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
7
Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.在提示-目标范式中,对返回抑制的因果关系的电生理探索。
Brain Topogr. 2011 Jun;24(2):164-82. doi: 10.1007/s10548-011-0172-3. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
8
The amplitude of N2pc reflects the physical disparity between target item and distracters.N2pc 的振幅反映了目标项目与干扰项之间的物理差异。
Neurosci Lett. 2011 Mar 10;491(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.12.066. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
9
Event-related potential study of novelty processing abnormalities in autism.自闭症中新颖性加工异常的事件相关电位研究
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2009 Mar;34(1):37-51. doi: 10.1007/s10484-009-9074-5. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
10
Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.分离与视觉空间注意力的自主控制相关的事件相关电位成分。
Brain Res. 2008 Aug 28;1227:96-109. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.034. Epub 2008 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of personality in social interaction perception: an ERP and source imaging study.人格在社会互动感知中的作用:一项 ERP 和源成像研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22164. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73694-0.
2
Damage to the right temporoparietal junction, but not lateral prefrontal or insular cortex, amplifies the role of goal-directed attention.右侧颞顶联合区受损,而非外侧前额叶或脑岛皮层受损,会放大目标导向注意的作用。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 22;9(1):306. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36537-3.
3
Taking a closer look at visual search: Just how feature-agnostic is singleton detection mode?
深入研究视觉搜索:单独目标检测模式对特征的不敏感性究竟如何?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):654-665. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-01642-y.
4
High-precision voluntary movements are largely independent of preceding vertex potentials elicited by sudden sensory events.高精度的随意运动在很大程度上独立于由突然的感觉事件引起的先前的顶点电位。
J Physiol. 2018 Aug;596(16):3655-3673. doi: 10.1113/JP275715. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Theta Oscillation Reveals the Temporal Involvement of Different Attentional Networks in Contingent Reorienting.θ振荡揭示了不同注意网络在偶然重新定向中的时间参与情况。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jun 3;10:264. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00264. eCollection 2016.
6
Nogo Stimuli Do Not Receive More Attentional Suppression or Response Inhibition than Neutral Stimuli: Evidence from the N2pc, PD, and N2 Components in a Spatial Cueing Paradigm.与中性刺激相比,Nogo刺激不会受到更多的注意抑制或反应抑制:来自空间线索范式中N2pc、PD和N2成分的证据。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 2;7:630. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00630. eCollection 2016.