University of Nottingham, School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK.
British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK.
Chemosphere. 2014 Sep;111:396-404. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.077. Epub 2014 May 14.
This research investigates the effect of nine physical treatment types comprising a serial combination of three drying (air, freeze and oven) and two comminution (milling and sieving) methods on the quantification of PAH in a soil sample from a former gasworks. Results show that treatment type has a significant effect on PAH concentration (p⩽0.05). Naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphthalene concentrations were significantly higher for air drying and freeze drying treatments than for oven drying. It is suggested that naphthalene and similarly volatile PAH losses were greater for oven drying due to the application of fanned warm air which is thought to cause volatilisation. Analytical precision was significantly improved for milled samples compared with sieved samples. The reason milling results in greater precision is assigned to the improved solvent extraction efficiency when natural grain size is altered due to crushing. The analytical data were compared to residential generic assessment criteria (GAC) used for risk-based land management. It was shown that the naphthalene GAC was lower than all freeze drying and air drying concentrations but was within the oven drying concentration range, illustrating that a false negative could be concluded during risk evaluation is oven dried data were used. Overall, it is recommended that air drying or freeze drying is a better choice than oven drying if the quantification of low molecular weight PAH forms an important objective of sample characterisation for risk-based land management, otherwise freeze drying and milling is recommended.
本研究调查了九种物理处理类型对前煤气厂土壤样本中多环芳烃(PAH)定量的影响,这些处理类型包括三种干燥(空气、冷冻和烘箱)和两种粉碎(研磨和筛分)方法的连续组合。结果表明,处理类型对 PAH 浓度有显著影响(p ⩽0.05)。与烘箱干燥相比,空气干燥和冷冻干燥处理的萘、1-甲基萘和 2-甲基萘浓度显著更高。据推测,由于应用了鼓风暖空气,导致萘和类似挥发性 PAH 的损失更大,因为这可能会引起挥发。与筛分样品相比,研磨样品的分析精度显著提高。研磨导致更高精度的原因归因于由于粉碎导致天然粒度发生变化,从而提高了溶剂提取效率。将分析数据与用于基于风险的土地管理的住宅通用评估标准(GAC)进行了比较。结果表明,萘 GAC 低于所有冷冻干燥和空气干燥浓度,但在烘箱干燥浓度范围内,这表明如果在风险评估中使用烘箱干燥数据,可能会得出错误的阴性结论。总体而言,如果低分子量 PAH 形式的定量是基于风险的土地管理中样品特征描述的重要目标,那么建议选择空气干燥或冷冻干燥,而不是烘箱干燥,否则建议选择冷冻干燥和研磨。