Kuijer P Paul Fm, Verbeek Jos Ham, Visser Bart, Elders Leo Am, Van Roden Nico, Van den Wittenboer Marion Er, Lebbink Marian, Burdorf Alex, Hulshof Carel Tj
Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Centre of Excellence, the Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB), Utrecht, the Netherlands ; Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Kuopio, Finland.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2014 Jun 24;26:16. doi: 10.1186/2052-4374-26-16. eCollection 2014.
We developed an evidence-based practice guideline to support occupational safety and health (OSH) professionals in assessing the risk due to lifting and in selecting effective preventive measures for low back pain (LBP) in the Netherlands. The guideline was developed at the request of the Dutch government by a project team of experts and OSH professionals in lifting and work-related LBP. The recommendations for risk assessment were based on the quality of instruments to assess the risk on LBP due to lifting. Recommendations for interventions were based on a systematic review of the effects of worker- and work directed interventions to reduce back load due to lifting. The quality of the evidence was rated as strong (A), moderate (B), limited (C) or based on consensus (D). Finally, eight experts and twenty-four OSH professionals commented on and evaluated the content and the feasibility of the preliminary guideline. For risk assessment we recommend loads heavier than 25 kg always to be considered a risk for LBP while loads less than 3 kg do not pose a risk. For loads between 3-25 kg, risk assessment shall be performed using the Manual handling Assessment Charts (MAC)-Tool or National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) lifting equation. Effective work oriented interventions are patient lifting devices (Level A) and lifting devices for goods (Level C), optimizing working height (Level A) and reducing load mass (Level C). Ineffective work oriented preventive measures are regulations to ban lifting without proper alternatives (Level D). We do not recommend worker-oriented interventions but consider personal lift assist devices as promising (Level C). Ineffective worker-oriented preventive measures are training in lifting technique (Level A), use of back-belts (Level A) and pre-employment medical examinations (Level A). This multidisciplinary evidence-based practice guideline gives clear criteria whether an employee is at risk for LBP while lifting and provides an easy-reference for (in)effective risk reduction measures based on scientific evidence, experience, and consensus among OSH experts and practitioners.
我们制定了一项循证实践指南,以支持荷兰职业安全与健康(OSH)专业人员评估因搬运造成的风险,并为下背痛(LBP)选择有效的预防措施。该指南是应荷兰政府要求,由一个由搬运及与工作相关的下背痛领域的专家和职业安全与健康专业人员组成的项目团队制定的。风险评估建议基于评估因搬运导致下背痛风险的工具质量。干预建议基于对旨在减少因搬运造成的背部负荷的针对工人和工作的干预措施效果的系统评价。证据质量被评为强(A)、中(B)、有限(C)或基于共识(D)。最后,八位专家和二十四位职业安全与健康专业人员对初步指南的内容和可行性进行了评论和评估。对于风险评估,我们建议始终将超过25千克的负荷视为下背痛风险因素,而小于3千克的负荷则不存在风险。对于3至25千克之间的负荷,应使用《人工搬运评估图表》(MAC)工具或美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)的搬运方程进行风险评估。有效的面向工作的干预措施包括患者搬运设备(A级)和货物搬运设备(C级)、优化工作高度(A级)以及减轻负荷质量(C级)。无效的面向工作的预防措施是禁止在没有适当替代方案的情况下进行搬运的规定(D级)。我们不建议采取面向工人的干预措施,但认为个人搬运辅助设备有前景(C级)。无效的面向工人的预防措施包括搬运技术培训(A级)、使用背带(A级)和入职前医学检查(A级)。这项多学科循证实践指南明确了员工在搬运时是否存在下背痛风险的标准,并基于科学证据、经验以及职业安全与健康专家和从业者的共识,为有效(或无效)的风险降低措施提供了便捷参考。