Petit Audrey, Fassier Jean-Baptiste, Rousseau Sandrine, Mairiaux Philippe, Roquelaure Yves
LUNAM University, Faculty of Medicine of Angers, Laboratory of Ergonomics and Epidemiology in Occupational health, Angers, France ; Occupational Health Department, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
UMRESTTE, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2015 Jul 22;27:18. doi: 10.1186/s40557-015-0069-9. eCollection 2015.
Several clinical practice guidelines related to the assessment and management of low back pain (LBP) have been published with varied scopes and methods. This paper summarises the first French occupational guidelines for management of work-related LBP (October 2013). There main originality is to treat all the three stages of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of work-related LBP. The guidelines were written by a multidisciplinary working group of 24 experts, according to the Clinical Practice Guidelines method proposed by French National Health Authority, and reviewed by a multidisciplinary peer review committee of 50 experts. Recommendations were based on a large systematic review of the literature carried out from 1990 to 2012 and rated as strong (Level A), moderate (B), limited (C) or based on expert consensus (D) according to their level of evidence. It is recommended to deliver reassuring and consistent information concerning LBP prognosis (Level B); to perform a clinical examination looking for medical signs of severity related to LBP (Level A), encourage continuation or resumption of physical activity (Level A), identify any changes in working conditions and evaluate the occupational impact of LBP (Level D). In case of persistent/recurrent LBP, assess prognostic factors likely to influence progression to chronic LBP, prolonged disability and delayed return to work (Level A). In case of prolonged/repeated sick leave, evaluate the pain, functional disability and their impact and main risk factors for prolonged work disability (Level A), promote return to work measures and inter professional coordination (Level D). These good practice guidelines are primarily intended for professionals of occupational health but also for treating physicians and paramedical personnel participating in the management of LBP, workers and employers.
已经发布了几份关于腰痛(LBP)评估和管理的临床实践指南,其范围和方法各不相同。本文总结了第一份法国职业性腰痛管理指南(2013年10月)。其主要特色在于涵盖了与工作相关的腰痛的一级、二级和三级预防的所有三个阶段。该指南由一个由24名专家组成的多学科工作小组根据法国国家卫生管理局提出的临床实践指南方法编写,并由一个由50名专家组成的多学科同行评审委员会进行评审。建议基于1990年至2012年进行的大量系统文献综述,并根据证据水平评为强推荐(A级)、中等推荐(B级)、有限推荐(C级)或基于专家共识(D级)。建议提供关于腰痛预后的令人安心且一致的信息(B级);进行临床检查以寻找与腰痛相关的严重程度的医学体征(A级),鼓励继续或恢复体育活动(A级),识别工作条件的任何变化并评估腰痛对职业的影响(D级)。对于持续性/复发性腰痛,评估可能影响进展为慢性腰痛、长期残疾和延迟重返工作岗位的预后因素(A级)。对于长期/反复病假的情况,评估疼痛、功能残疾及其影响以及长期工作残疾的主要风险因素(A级),促进重返工作岗位的措施和跨专业协调(D级)。这些良好实践指南主要面向职业健康专业人员,但也适用于参与腰痛管理的治疗医生和辅助医疗人员、工人和雇主。