• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复治疗不依从问卷的开发与验证:一种临床工具

Development and validation of non-adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation questionnaire: a clinical tool for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases.

作者信息

Ayiesah R, Leonard J H, Chong C Y

机构信息

Physiotherapy Programme, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Clin Ter. 2014;165(3):123-8. doi: 10.7417/CT.2014.1708.

DOI:10.7417/CT.2014.1708
PMID:24999563
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Non-adherence is a serious issue among the participants in pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP). Till date, no clinical tool is available to screen participants who will show poor adherence towards PRP. This study aimed to develop and validate a tool called "Adherence to Pulmonary Rehabilitation Questionnaire (APRQ)", a self-administered questionnaire to screen the risk of non-adherence to PRP among the patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. APRQ comprises of 6 main constructs such as disease management behaviour, perceived treatment benefits, emotional factors, perceived severity of disease, barriers towards treatment and coping attitude.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a preliminary validity study carried out in the physiotherapy department and respiratory clinic in an university teaching hospital. A total of 109 patients with average age of 58.8 ± 1 year participated in the study. The inclusion criteria for subjects were: patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) (Stage II and III). Exclusion criteria include those COPD patients with mental problems and disabled patients. The tool was developed based on thematic analysis and in-depth interview with focus group and literature search on the factors that lead to non-adherence among the PRP's participants. Principal component analysis was carried out to examine the construct validity and content validity of APRQ.

RESULTS

A total of 20 items were created under 6 constructs. However, 2 items (smoking and hospital admission) were eliminated due to poor correlations. Thus, the final version of APRQ was developed and validated with 18 items. Reliability was measured using internal consistency and achieved Cronbach's Alpha of 0.762.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this preliminary study supports that APRQ may be a valid and reliable tool to screen adherence towards PRP among chronic lung disease patients.

摘要

目的

在肺康复计划(PRP)参与者中,不依从是一个严重问题。迄今为止,尚无临床工具可用于筛查对PRP依从性差的参与者。本研究旨在开发并验证一种名为“肺康复依从性问卷(APRQ)”的工具,这是一种自我管理的问卷,用于筛查慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中不依从PRP的风险。APRQ由6个主要结构组成,如疾病管理行为、感知到的治疗益处、情绪因素、感知到的疾病严重程度、治疗障碍和应对态度。

材料与方法

这是一项在大学教学医院的理疗科和呼吸诊所进行的初步效度研究。共有109名平均年龄为58.8±1岁的患者参与了该研究。受试者的纳入标准为:被诊断为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)(II期和III期)的患者。排除标准包括患有精神问题的COPD患者和残疾患者。该工具是基于主题分析、对焦点小组的深入访谈以及对导致PRP参与者不依从的因素的文献检索而开发的。进行主成分分析以检验APRQ的结构效度和内容效度。

结果

在6个结构下共创建了20个项目。然而,由于相关性较差,2个项目(吸烟和住院)被剔除。因此,最终版本的APRQ由18个项目组成并经过了验证。使用内部一致性来测量信度,Cronbach's Alpha系数为0.762。

结论

这项初步研究的结果支持,APRQ可能是一种有效且可靠的工具,用于筛查慢性肺病患者对PRP的依从性。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of non-adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation questionnaire: a clinical tool for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复治疗不依从问卷的开发与验证:一种临床工具
Clin Ter. 2014;165(3):123-8. doi: 10.7417/CT.2014.1708.
2
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) for individuals with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者适用的韩语版肺康复自我效能适应性指数(PRAISE)的心理测量特性。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Aug 29;12:2611-2620. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S142488. eCollection 2017.
3
Validation of the 'Test of the Adherence to Inhalers' (TAI) for Asthma and COPD Patients.“吸入器依从性测试”(TAI)在哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的验证
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2016 Apr;29(2):142-52. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2015.1212. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
4
Development of the Chinese-version of the exercise self-regulatory efficacy scale for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者运动自我调节效能量表中文版的研制
Heart Lung. 2018 Jan-Feb;47(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
5
The Norwegian version of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease self-efficacy scale (CSES): a validation and reliability study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我效能量表(CSES)的挪威语版本:一项效度和信度研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2010 Sep;24(3):600-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00731.x.
6
Pulmonary rehabilitation adapted index of self-efficacy (PRAISE) validated to Portuguese respiratory patients.适用于葡萄牙呼吸疾病患者的肺康复自我效能评定量表(PRAISE)已得到验证。
Pulmonology. 2019 Nov-Dec;25(6):334-339. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
7
Reliability and Validity of the Brief Fatigue Inventory and Dyspnea Inventory in People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中简明疲劳量表和呼吸困难量表的信度与效度
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Aug;52(2):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 May 24.
8
Stage 1 development of a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).患者报告的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)体验量表(PREM)的第一阶段开发。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Jul 24;27(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0047-5.
9
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity Study of the Persian Version of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire.慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床问卷波斯语版的跨文化适应、信度和效度研究
Acta Med Iran. 2016 Aug;54(8):518-524.
10
Adherence to Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Dietary Pattern in Relation to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Case-Control Study.饮食防治高血压 (DASH) 饮食模式与慢性阻塞性肺疾病 (COPD) 的关系:一项病例对照研究。
J Am Coll Nutr. 2017 Sep-Oct;36(7):549-555. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2017.1326858. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement Properties of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Medication Adherence: Systematic Review.现有药物依从性患者报告结局测量工具的测量特性:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e19179. doi: 10.2196/19179.
2
Development of an Item Bank to Measure Medication Adherence: Systematic Review.开发用于测量药物依从性的项目库:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):e19089. doi: 10.2196/19089.
3
Validation of the Adherence Barriers Questionnaire - an instrument for identifying potential risk factors associated with medication-related non-adherence.
依从性障碍问卷的验证——一种用于识别与药物治疗相关不依从性潜在风险因素的工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 10;15:153. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0809-0.