Habiela Mohammed, Seago Julian, Perez-Martin Eva, Waters Ryan, Windsor Miriam, Salguero Francisco J, Wood James, Charleston Bryan, Juleff Nicholas
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK.
The Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK.
J Gen Virol. 2014 Nov;95(Pt 11):2329-2345. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.068270-0. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
Laboratory animal models have provided valuable insight into foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) pathogenesis in epidemiologically important target species. While not perfect, these models have delivered an accelerated time frame to characterize the immune responses in natural hosts and a platform to evaluate therapeutics and vaccine candidates at a reduced cost. Further expansion of these models in mice has allowed access to genetic mutations not available for target species, providing a powerful and versatile experimental system to interrogate the immune response to FMDV and to target more expensive studies in natural hosts. The purpose of this review is to describe commonly used FMDV infection models in laboratory animals and to cite examples of when these models have failed or successfully provided insight relevant for target species, with an emphasis on natural and vaccine-induced immunity.
实验动物模型为深入了解口蹄疫病毒(FMDV)在具有重要流行病学意义的目标物种中的发病机制提供了宝贵的见解。尽管这些模型并非完美无缺,但它们缩短了表征天然宿主免疫反应所需的时间,并提供了一个以较低成本评估治疗方法和候选疫苗的平台。在小鼠中对这些模型的进一步扩展,使得能够利用目标物种所没有的基因突变,从而提供了一个强大且通用的实验系统,用于探究针对FMDV的免疫反应,并针对天然宿主中更昂贵的研究进行靶向研究。本综述的目的是描述实验动物中常用的FMDV感染模型,并列举这些模型失败或成功提供与目标物种相关见解的实例,重点是天然免疫和疫苗诱导的免疫。