• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发缓解型和继发进展型多发性硬化症患者的认知障碍:计算机化认知筛查量表的疗效

Cognitive impairment in relapsing remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients: efficacy of a computerized cognitive screening battery.

作者信息

Papathanasiou Athanasios, Messinis Lambros, Georgiou Vasileios L, Papathanasopoulos Panagiotis

机构信息

Neuropsychology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Patras Medical School, 265 04 Patras, Greece ; Department of Neurology, Essex Centre for Neurological Sciences, Queen's Hospital, Romford, RM70AG, UK.

Neuropsychology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Patras Medical School, 265 04 Patras, Greece.

出版信息

ISRN Neurol. 2014 Mar 13;2014:151379. doi: 10.1155/2014/151379. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1155/2014/151379
PMID:25006497
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3976849/
Abstract

Objective. To investigate the pattern of cognitive impairment in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) patients using a computerized battery. Methods. RRMS patients (N = 50), SPMS patients (N = 30), and controls (N = 31) were assessed by Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS VS) computerized battery, Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B, and semantic and phonological verbal fluency tasks. Results. The overall prevalence of cognitive dysfunction was 53.75% (RRMS 38%, SPMS 80%). RRMS patients differed from controls with large effect size on reaction time, medium effect size on TMT A and small on TMT B, phonological verbal fluency, composite memory, psychomotor speed, and cognitive flexibility. SPMS patients differed from controls in all neuropsychological measures (except complex attention) with large effect sizes on TMT A and B, phonological verbal fluency, composite memory, psychomotor speed, reaction time, and cognitive flexibility. Between patient groups, medium effect sizes were present on TMT B and psychomotor speed, while small effect sizes were present on composite memory and processing speed. Conclusion. CNS VS is sensitive in detecting cognitive impairment in RRMS and SPMS patients. Significant impairment in episodic memory, executive function, and processing speed were identified, with gradual increment of the frequency as disease progresses.

摘要

目的。使用计算机化测试组来研究复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)和继发进展型多发性硬化症(SPMS)患者的认知障碍模式。方法。通过中枢神经系统生命体征(CNS VS)计算机化测试组、连线测验(TMT)A和B以及语义和语音语言流畅性任务对RRMS患者(N = 50)、SPMS患者(N = 30)和对照组(N = 31)进行评估。结果。认知功能障碍的总体患病率为53.75%(RRMS为38%,SPMS为80%)。RRMS患者与对照组在反应时间上有较大效应量差异,在TMT A上有中等效应量差异,在TMT B、语音语言流畅性、综合记忆、心理运动速度和认知灵活性上有较小效应量差异。SPMS患者与对照组在所有神经心理学测量指标(复杂注意力除外)上均有差异,在TMT A和B、语音语言流畅性、综合记忆、心理运动速度、反应时间和认知灵活性上有较大效应量差异。在患者组之间,TMT B和心理运动速度上有中等效应量差异,而综合记忆和处理速度上有较小效应量差异。结论。CNS VS对检测RRMS和SPMS患者的认知障碍很敏感。发现情景记忆、执行功能和处理速度有显著损害,且随着疾病进展频率逐渐增加。

相似文献

1
Cognitive impairment in relapsing remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients: efficacy of a computerized cognitive screening battery.复发缓解型和继发进展型多发性硬化症患者的认知障碍:计算机化认知筛查量表的疗效
ISRN Neurol. 2014 Mar 13;2014:151379. doi: 10.1155/2014/151379. eCollection 2014.
2
Thalamic atrophy predicts cognitive impairment in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Effect on instrumental activities of daily living and employment status.丘脑萎缩可预测复发缓解型多发性硬化症的认知障碍。对日常生活工具性活动和就业状况的影响。
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Nov 15;358(1-2):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
3
Corpus callosum atrophy as a marker of clinically meaningful cognitive decline in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Impact on employment status.胼胝体萎缩作为继发进展型多发性硬化症中具有临床意义的认知衰退标志物。对就业状况的影响。
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Sep;43:170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.05.032. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
4
Cognitive and Language Deficits in Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison of Relapsing Remitting and Secondary Progressive Subtypes.多发性硬化症中的认知和语言缺陷:复发缓解型与继发进展型亚型的比较
Open Neurol J. 2018 Mar 12;12:19-30. doi: 10.2174/1874205X01812010019. eCollection 2018.
5
Phonological fluency strategy of switching differentiates relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients.转换的语音流畅性策略可区分复发缓解型和继发进展型多发性硬化症患者。
ISRN Neurol. 2013;2013:451429. doi: 10.1155/2013/451429. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
6
Differences in cognitive impairment of relapsing remitting, secondary, and primary progressive MS.复发缓解型、继发进展型和原发进展型多发性硬化症认知障碍的差异。
Neurology. 2004 Jul 27;63(2):335-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000129828.03714.90.
7
Cognitive impairment differs between primary progressive and relapsing-remitting MS.认知障碍在原发性进行性和复发缓解型多发性硬化症之间有所不同。
Neurology. 2013 Apr 16;80(16):1501-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828cf82f. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
8
[Information processing speed and influential factors in multiple sclerosis].[多发性硬化症中的信息处理速度及影响因素]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Apr 19;96(15):1173-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.15.006.
9
Cognitive impairment in a population-based study of patients with multiple sclerosis: differences between late relapsing-remitting, secondary progressive and primary progressive multiple sclerosis.一项基于人群的多发性硬化症患者认知障碍研究:晚期复发缓解型、继发进展型和原发进展型多发性硬化症之间的差异
Eur J Neurol. 2016 Feb;23(2):282-9. doi: 10.1111/ene.12715. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
10
Cognitive performance in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study in daily practice using a brief computerized cognitive battery.复发缓解型多发性硬化症的认知表现:使用简短计算机化认知测试在日常实践中的纵向研究。
BMC Neurol. 2011 Jun 7;11:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-68.

引用本文的文献

1
A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multi-centre, phase III study of MLC901 (NeuroAiDTMII) for the treatment of cognitive impairment after mild traumatic brain injury.一项关于MLC901(NeuroAiDTMII)治疗轻度创伤性脑损伤后认知障碍的双盲、安慰剂对照、随机、多中心III期研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 10;20(7):e0310229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310229. eCollection 2025.
2
Factor Structure and Validity of Composite Scores Resulting From a Computerized Cognitive Test Battery in Healthy Adults and Patients With Primary Brain Tumors.健康成年人和原发性脑肿瘤患者使用计算机化认知测试组合得出的综合分数的因子结构与效度
Assessment. 2024 Nov 20;32(7):10731911241289987. doi: 10.1177/10731911241289987.
3
The relationship between cognitive function and functional capacity, and cognitive reserve and reaction time in patients with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者的认知功能与功能能力、认知储备与反应时间之间的关系。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2024 Sep;82(9):1-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788273. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
4
Orchestrating a New Path for Multiple Sclerosis: Achieving Physical, Cognitive, and Emotional Rehabilitation Goals Through Physical and Music Therapy.为多发性硬化症规划新路径:通过物理治疗和音乐疗法实现身体、认知和情感康复目标。
Int J MS Care. 2023 Jul-Aug;25(4):168-175. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2021-144. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
5
The Two Sides of Siponimod: Evidence for Brain and Immune Mechanisms in Multiple Sclerosis.西尼莫德的两面性:多发性硬化症中的脑和免疫机制证据。
CNS Drugs. 2022 Jul;36(7):703-719. doi: 10.1007/s40263-022-00927-z. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
6
Cognitive performance in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.系统性红斑狼疮患者的认知表现:一项横断面和纵向研究。
BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Apr 20;6(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00253-3.
7
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigating Safety and efficAcy of MLC901 in post-traUmatic bRAin Injury: the SAMURAI study protocol.随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究调查 MLC901 在创伤性脑损伤后的安全性和疗效:SAMURAI 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 13;12(4):e059167. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059167.
8
Should We Use Clinical Tools to Identify Disease Progression?我们应该使用临床工具来识别疾病进展吗?
Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 21;11:628542. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.628542. eCollection 2020.
9
Cognitive Disorders in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者的认知障碍
Mater Sociomed. 2020 Sep;32(3):191-195. doi: 10.5455/msm.2020.32.191-195.
10
Cognitive Impairment and Brain Reorganization in MS: Underlying Mechanisms and the Role of Neurorehabilitation.多发性硬化症中的认知障碍与大脑重组:潜在机制及神经康复的作用
Front Neurol. 2020 Mar 6;11:147. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00147. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Detecting cognitive dysfunction in a busy multiple sclerosis clinical setting: a computer generated approach.在繁忙的多发性硬化症临床环境中检测认知功能障碍:一种计算机生成的方法。
Eur J Neurol. 2014 Feb;21(2):281-6. doi: 10.1111/ene.12292. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
2
Assessing the validity of a computer-generated cognitive screening instrument for patients with multiple sclerosis.评估一种用于多发性硬化症患者的计算机生成认知筛查工具的有效性。
Mult Scler. 2013 Dec;19(14):1905-12. doi: 10.1177/1352458513488841. Epub 2013 May 7.
3
A new computerised cognitive test for the detection of information processing speed impairment in multiple sclerosis.一种新的计算机化认知测试,用于检测多发性硬化症中的信息处理速度障碍。
Mult Scler. 2013 Oct;19(12):1665-72. doi: 10.1177/1352458513480251. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
4
Cognition in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症的认知功能障碍。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2011 Jun;24(3):244-9. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328346a43b.
5
Validity of a computerized version of the symbol digit modalities test in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症中符号数字模式测验计算机化版本的有效性。
J Neurol. 2011 Mar;258(3):373-9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5760-8. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
6
Predicting employment status in multiple sclerosis patients: the utility of the MS functional composite.预测多发性硬化症患者的就业状况:MS 功能综合评分的效用。
J Neurol. 2011 Feb;258(2):244-9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5736-8. Epub 2010 Sep 12.
7
Relevance of cognitive deterioration in early relapsing-remitting MS: a 3-year follow-up study.认知功能恶化与早期复发缓解型多发性硬化症的相关性:一项为期 3 年的随访研究。
Mult Scler. 2010 Dec;16(12):1474-82. doi: 10.1177/1352458510380089. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
8
Assessment and rehabilitation of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化认知障碍的评估和康复。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2010;22(1):22-34. doi: 10.3109/09540261003589372.
9
Early cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis predicts disability outcome several years later.多发性硬化症早期认知障碍可预测数年后的残疾结局。
Mult Scler. 2010 May;16(5):581-7. doi: 10.1177/1352458510362819. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
10
Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: association with emotional status, personality, and cognition.多发性硬化症的治疗依从性:与情绪状态、人格和认知的关系。
J Behav Med. 2010 Jun;33(3):219-27. doi: 10.1007/s10865-010-9247-y. Epub 2010 Feb 3.