• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦对召回的 Riata 除颤器导联进行前瞻性全国范围透视和电纵向随访。

Prospective nationwide fluoroscopic and electrical longitudinal follow-up of recalled Riata defibrillator leads in Denmark.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Center for Cardiovascular Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2014 Dec;11(12):2141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.07.003
PMID:25008285
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recalled St. Jude Medical Riata defibrillator leads are prone to insulation failures with externalized conductors (ECs). Longitudinal studies are needed to guide lead management.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the dynamic nature of EC and the association with electrical abnormalities and lead extraction outcomes.

METHODS

A nationwide cohort established in 2012 of 295 patients with recalled Riata leads with dwell time 5.1 ± 1.1 years, 34 ECs, and 19 electrical abnormalities were followed until death, lead discontinuation with fluoroscopy, or a new 2013 screening with fluoroscopy and device interrogation.

RESULTS

Fluoroscopic follow-up of 239 patients with normal baseline fluoroscopy revealed incident overt EC in 8 leads and borderline EC in 2 leads after 1.1 ± 0.2 years, with an incidence rate of 3.7 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval 2.0-6.9). Fluoroscopic follow-up in 27 patients with baseline EC showed an increase in EC length of 4 ± 1 mm (P <.001) after 1.1 ± 0.3 years. Electrical follow-up in 276 patients with normal baseline electrical function demonstrated 20 incident electrical abnormalities after 1.0 ± 0.3 years, with an incidence rate of 7.1 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval 4.6-11.0). This rate was significantly higher in leads with baseline EC, with an adjusted incidence rate ratio of 4.4 (95% confidence interval 1.7-11.5, P = .002). In 15 extractions, all leads were removed, with 2 major complications.

CONCLUSION

The development of EC is a dynamic process despite long lead dwell time. ECs are associated with a higher risk of electrical abnormalities. Therefore, lead replacement should be considered, especially in patients with a long life expectancy.

摘要

背景

已召回的圣犹达 Riata 除颤器导联易发生带有外部导体(EC)的绝缘故障。需要进行纵向研究来指导导联管理。

目的

本研究旨在描述 EC 的动态性质及其与电异常和导联拔除结果的关联。

方法

2012 年建立了一个全国性队列,纳入 295 例 Riata 召回导联患者,留置时间为 5.1±1.1 年,有 34 个 EC,19 个电异常,随访至死亡、通过荧光透视法停止使用导联或在 2013 年进行新的荧光透视法和设备检查筛查。

结果

239 例基线荧光透视法正常的患者进行荧光透视法随访,1.1±0.2 年后 8 个导联出现明显的 EC,2 个导联出现边界性 EC,发病率为 3.7/100 人年(95%置信区间 2.0-6.9)。27 例基线有 EC 的患者进行荧光透视法随访,1.1±0.3 年后 EC 长度增加 4±1mm(P<.001)。276 例基线电功能正常的患者进行电随访,1.0±0.3 年后发生 20 例电异常,发病率为 7.1/100 人年(95%置信区间 4.6-11.0)。在基线有 EC 的导联中,发病率明显更高,校正发病率比为 4.4(95%置信区间 1.7-11.5,P=.002)。在 15 次拔除中,所有导联均被拔除,发生 2 例重大并发症。

结论

尽管留置时间较长,但 EC 的发展是一个动态过程。EC 与电异常的风险增加有关。因此,应考虑更换导联,尤其是在预期寿命较长的患者中。

相似文献

1
Prospective nationwide fluoroscopic and electrical longitudinal follow-up of recalled Riata defibrillator leads in Denmark.丹麦对召回的 Riata 除颤器导联进行前瞻性全国范围透视和电纵向随访。
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Dec;11(12):2141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
2
Fluoroscopic and electrical assessment of a series of defibrillation leads: prevalence of externalized conductors.一系列除颤导线的荧光镜检查和电评估:外露导体的发生率
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Dec;35(12):1498-504. doi: 10.1111/pace.12010. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
3
Prevalence and presentation of externalized conductors and electrical abnormalities in Riata defibrillator leads after fluoroscopic screening: report from the Netherlands Heart Rhythm Association Device Advisory Committee.荧光透视筛查后 Riata 除颤器导联中外化导体和电异常的发生率和表现:荷兰心律协会设备咨询委员会的报告。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Dec;5(6):1059-63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.975755. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
4
Nationwide Longitudinal Follow-Up of Riata Leads Under Advisory at 3 Annual Screenings: Report From the Netherlands Heart Rhythm Association Device Advisory Committee.全国范围内对 3 次年度筛查时接受咨询的 Riata 导联的长期随访:荷兰心律协会设备咨询委员会的报告。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Aug;3(8):887-893. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.12.011. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
5
The patient perspective on the Riata defibrillator lead advisory: a Danish nationwide study.患者对 Riata 除颤器导联咨询的看法:一项丹麦全国性研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Dec;11(12):2148-55. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
6
High prevalence of insulation failure with externalized cables in St. Jude Medical Riata family ICD leads: fluoroscopic grading scale and correlation to extracted leads.圣犹达 Riata 家族 ICD 导联中带外化电缆的绝缘失效高发:透视分级量表与提取导联的相关性。
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Aug;9(8):1218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.03.049. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
7
Prospective long-term evaluation of Optim-insulated (Riata ST Optim and Durata) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.前瞻性评估 Optim-insulated(Riata ST Optim 和 Durata)植入式心脏复律除颤器导线。
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Dec;11(12):2156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.08.023. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
8
Prevalence of externalized conductors in Riata and Riata ST silicone leads: results from the prospective, multicenter Riata Lead Evaluation Study.Riata 和 Riata ST 硅酮导联中外部导体的患病率:前瞻性、多中心 Riata 导联评估研究的结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Dec;10(12):1778-82. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.030. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
9
The Canadian experience with Durata and Riata ST Optim defibrillator leads: a report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Committee.加拿大在 Durata 和 Riata ST Optim 除颤器方面的经验:来自加拿大心律协会设备委员会的报告。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Oct;10(10):1478-81. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.07.050. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
10
A Comparative Study of Defibrillator Leads at a Large-Volume Implanting Hospital: Results From the Pacemaker and Implantable Defibrillator Leads Survival Study ("PAIDLESS").一家大容量植入医院的除颤器导线比较研究:起搏器和植入式除颤器导线生存研究(“PAIDLESS”)的结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 Jun;27(6):292-300.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term Outcome of Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Lead Failure.植入式心脏转复除颤器导线故障的长期预后。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):322-324. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4717.
2
Failure-free survival of the Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead after a very long-term follow-up.Riata植入式心脏复律除颤器导线经过极长期随访后的无故障存活情况。
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2019 Jul-Aug;19(4):140-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
3
The Incidence of Riata Defibrillator Lead Failure: a Single-Center Experience.
里亚塔除颤器导联故障的发生率:单中心经验。
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Oct;32(10):1610-1615. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.10.1610.
4
Shock-induced right ventricular pacing failure caused by a short circuit: Uncommon but life-threatening complication of the Riata lead.短路导致的休克诱发右心室起搏失败:Riata导线罕见但危及生命的并发症
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2015 Feb 18;1(2):46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2014.11.005. eCollection 2015 Mar.
5
Riata silicone defibrillation lead with normal electrical measures at routine ambulatory check: The role of high-voltage shock testing.在常规动态检查中电参数正常的Riata硅胶除颤导线:高压电击测试的作用
World J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 26;8(11):657-666. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i11.657.
6
Cost of a recall of a single-center experience managing the Riata defibrillator lead.单中心处理Riata除颤器导线召回事件的成本。
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 15;115(2):206-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.10.028. Epub 2014 Oct 30.