• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

里亚塔除颤器导联故障的发生率:单中心经验。

The Incidence of Riata Defibrillator Lead Failure: a Single-Center Experience.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Oct;32(10):1610-1615. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.10.1610.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2017.32.10.1610
PMID:28875604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5592174/
Abstract

Riata defibrillator leads were recalled due to a high failure rate. This study measured the incidence of externalized conductor (EC) and electrical dysfunction (ED) and sought to determine the predictors of ED with Riata defibrillator leads. We enrolled patients who received Riata® or Riata® ST silicone defibrillator leads at our center between January 2003 and December 2010. The presence of EC was evaluated with chest radiography. The incidence rates were measured at < 3 years, 3-5 years, and > 5 years after lead implantation. We also investigated the rates of ED and other clinical events during the follow-up period. A total of 44 patients were analyzed. The total cumulative incidence of EC was 27.3%. During the median dwell time (80 months), the incidence of ED was 22.7%. Patients with ED were younger (46.5 vs. 56.5 years, P = 0.018) and had a higher prevalence of cardiomyopathy than those without ED (60.0% vs. 20.6%, P = 0.043). ECs were most frequently detected in patients who underwent X-ray analysis 3-5 years after lead implantation (44.4%). In contrast, ED had a bimodal incidence pattern, with peaks at 5 years (7.0%) and 9 years (5.3%). There was no difference in ED-free survival rate between patients with and without EC (P = 0.628). Given the delayed occurrence of EC and ED after implantation of Riata defibrillator leads, long-term close monitoring is critically important.

摘要

由于高故障率,Riata 除颤器导线被召回。本研究测量了外部化导体 (EC) 和电功能障碍 (ED) 的发生率,并试图确定 Riata 除颤器导线 ED 的预测因素。我们招募了 2003 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月期间在我们中心接受 Riata®或 Riata®ST 硅酮除颤器导线的患者。通过胸部 X 射线评估 EC 的存在。在植入导线后<3 年、3-5 年和>5 年测量发生率。我们还调查了随访期间 ED 和其他临床事件的发生率。共分析了 44 例患者。EC 的总累积发生率为 27.3%。在中位随访时间(80 个月)期间,ED 的发生率为 22.7%。ED 患者比无 ED 患者年轻(46.5 岁 vs. 56.5 岁,P = 0.018),且心肌病患病率更高(60.0% vs. 20.6%,P = 0.043)。在植入导线后 3-5 年进行 X 射线分析的患者中,EC 最常被检测到(44.4%)。相比之下,ED 的发生率呈双峰模式,峰值出现在 5 年(7.0%)和 9 年(5.3%)。有无 EC 的患者 ED 无事件生存率无差异(P = 0.628)。鉴于 Riata 除颤器导线植入后 EC 和 ED 的发生延迟,长期密切监测至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/5592174/299ae400eeb3/jkms-32-1610-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/5592174/5d5bdd4c82f0/jkms-32-1610-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/5592174/bfa3c81814d3/jkms-32-1610-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/5592174/2ae2ee8e33ab/jkms-32-1610-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/5592174/a3f6beb199c3/jkms-32-1610-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/5592174/d81f95bf36f3/jkms-32-1610-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/5592174/299ae400eeb3/jkms-32-1610-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/5592174/5d5bdd4c82f0/jkms-32-1610-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/5592174/bfa3c81814d3/jkms-32-1610-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/5592174/2ae2ee8e33ab/jkms-32-1610-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/5592174/a3f6beb199c3/jkms-32-1610-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/5592174/d81f95bf36f3/jkms-32-1610-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84e/5592174/299ae400eeb3/jkms-32-1610-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The Incidence of Riata Defibrillator Lead Failure: a Single-Center Experience.里亚塔除颤器导联故障的发生率:单中心经验。
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Oct;32(10):1610-1615. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.10.1610.
2
Prevalence of externalized conductors in Riata and Riata ST silicone leads: results from the prospective, multicenter Riata Lead Evaluation Study.Riata 和 Riata ST 硅酮导联中外部导体的患病率:前瞻性、多中心 Riata 导联评估研究的结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Dec;10(12):1778-82. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.030. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
3
Long-Term Performance of the Riata/ST Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead.Riata/ST植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的长期性能
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;117(5):807-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.013. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
4
Failure of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: a matter of lead size?植入式心脏复律除颤器导线故障:导线尺寸的问题?
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Feb;10(2):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
5
The Canadian experience with Durata and Riata ST Optim defibrillator leads: a report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Committee.加拿大在 Durata 和 Riata ST Optim 除颤器方面的经验:来自加拿大心律协会设备委员会的报告。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Oct;10(10):1478-81. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.07.050. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
6
Prospective nationwide fluoroscopic and electrical longitudinal follow-up of recalled Riata defibrillator leads in Denmark.丹麦对召回的 Riata 除颤器导联进行前瞻性全国范围透视和电纵向随访。
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Dec;11(12):2141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
7
Mechanisms, predictors, and trends of electrical failure of Riata leads.里亚塔导联电故障的机制、预测因素和趋势。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Oct;10(10):1453-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
8
Mechanical and electrical dysfunction of Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.Riata植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的机械和电气功能障碍。
Europace. 2014 Dec;16(12):1787-94. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu079. Epub 2014 May 19.
9
Transvenous extraction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads under advisory--a comparison of Riata, Sprint Fidelis, and non-recalled implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.经皮心内膜下心导管取出术在咨询下进行——比较 Riata、Sprint Fidelis 和未召回的植入式心脏复律除颤器导线。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Oct;10(10):1444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.06.021. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
10
A Comparative Study of Defibrillator Leads at a Large-Volume Implanting Hospital: Results From the Pacemaker and Implantable Defibrillator Leads Survival Study ("PAIDLESS").一家大容量植入医院的除颤器导线比较研究:起搏器和植入式除颤器导线生存研究(“PAIDLESS”)的结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 Jun;27(6):292-300.

引用本文的文献

1
Poorer outcomes associated with more invasive lead management strategies for Abbott Riata leads: a large, multicenter experience.与雅培 Riata 导联更具侵袭性的导联管理策略相关的较差预后:一项大型多中心经验。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Aug;67(5):1127-1132. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01673-y. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
2
Riata lead failure manifests as electrical storm with lead parameters showing unique postural variations: a case report.Riata导线故障表现为电风暴,导线参数显示出独特的体位变化:一例病例报告。
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021 Dec 7;5(12):ytab491. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab491. eCollection 2021 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of Sprint Fidelis and Riata lead extraction: Data from 2 high-volume centers.斯普林特菲德利斯(Sprint Fidelis)和瑞阿塔(Riata)导线取出术的结果:来自两个高容量中心的数据。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jun;12(6):1216-20. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.02.031. Epub 2015 May 18.
2
Transvenous extraction profile of Riata leads: procedural outcomes and technical complexity of mechanical removal.Riata 导线的经静脉取出特征:机械移除的程序结果和技术复杂性。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Mar;12(3):580-587. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.013. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
3
Prospective nationwide fluoroscopic and electrical longitudinal follow-up of recalled Riata defibrillator leads in Denmark.
丹麦对召回的 Riata 除颤器导联进行前瞻性全国范围透视和电纵向随访。
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Dec;11(12):2141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
4
Mechanical and electrical dysfunction of Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.Riata植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的机械和电气功能障碍。
Europace. 2014 Dec;16(12):1787-94. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu079. Epub 2014 May 19.
5
Comparative outcomes of transvenous extraction of sprint fidelis and riata defibrillator leads: a single center experience.经静脉取出 Sprint Fidelis 和 Riata 除颤器导线的比较结果:单中心经验。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Jan;25(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/jce.12265. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
6
Prevalence of externalized conductors in Riata and Riata ST silicone leads: results from the prospective, multicenter Riata Lead Evaluation Study.Riata 和 Riata ST 硅酮导联中外部导体的患病率:前瞻性、多中心 Riata 导联评估研究的结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Dec;10(12):1778-82. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.030. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
7
Transvenous extraction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads under advisory--a comparison of Riata, Sprint Fidelis, and non-recalled implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.经皮心内膜下心导管取出术在咨询下进行——比较 Riata、Sprint Fidelis 和未召回的植入式心脏复律除颤器导线。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Oct;10(10):1444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.06.021. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
8
A case of riata® dual coil defibrillator lead failure in a patient with ventricular fibrillation.一例 Riata® 双线圈除颤器导联故障致心室颤动患者。
Korean Circ J. 2013 May;43(5):336-9. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2013.43.5.336. Epub 2013 May 31.
9
Nationwide fluoroscopic screening of recalled Riata defibrillator leads in Denmark.丹麦全国范围内对召回 Riata 除颤器导联进行透视筛查。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Jun;10(6):821-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.02.010. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
10
Detection of high incidence of Riata lead breaches by systematic postero-anterior and lateral chest X-ray in a large cohort.通过对大量队列进行系统的前后位和侧位胸部 X 光检查,发现 Riata 导联断裂的高发生率。
Europace. 2013 Mar;15(3):402-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus339. Epub 2012 Nov 1.