• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保持巢穴清洁:蚂蚁移除尸体的生存优势

Keep the nest clean: survival advantages of corpse removal in ants.

作者信息

Diez Lise, Lejeune Philippe, Detrain Claire

机构信息

Unit of Social Ecology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium

Unité de Gestion des Ressources forestières et des Milieux Naturels, Université de Liège, Gembloux, Belgium.

出版信息

Biol Lett. 2014 Jul;10(7). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0306.

DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0306
PMID:25009241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4126623/
Abstract

Sociality increases exposure to pathogens. Therefore, social insects have developed a wide range of behavioural defences, known as 'social immunity'. However, the benefits of these behaviours in terms of colony survival have been scarcely investigated. We tested the survival advantage of prophylaxis, i.e. corpse removal, in ants. Over 50 days, we compared the survival of ants in colonies that were free to remove corpses with those that were restricted in their corpse removal. From Day 8 onwards, the survival of adult workers was significantly higher in colonies that were allowed to remove corpses normally. Overall, larvae survived better than adults, but were slightly affected by the presence of corpses in the nest. When removal was restricted, ants removed as many corpses as they could and moved the remaining corpses away from brood, typically to the nest corners. These results show the importance of nest maintenance and prophylactic behaviour in social insects.

摘要

社会性增加了接触病原体的机会。因此,群居昆虫已经发展出了广泛的行为防御机制,即所谓的“社会免疫”。然而,这些行为对蚁群生存的益处却鲜有研究。我们测试了预防性措施(即移除尸体)对蚂蚁的生存优势。在50天的时间里,我们比较了能够自由移除尸体的蚁群和尸体移除受到限制的蚁群中蚂蚁的存活率。从第8天起,能够正常移除尸体的蚁群中成年工蚁的存活率显著更高。总体而言,幼虫比成虫存活得更好,但巢穴中尸体的存在对其有轻微影响。当移除受到限制时,蚂蚁会尽可能多地移除尸体,并将剩余尸体从幼虫处移开,通常移到巢穴角落。这些结果表明了巢穴维护和预防性行为在群居昆虫中的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6f7/4126623/5603f25129c5/rsbl20140306-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6f7/4126623/8d4a3b34b5e1/rsbl20140306-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6f7/4126623/5603f25129c5/rsbl20140306-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6f7/4126623/8d4a3b34b5e1/rsbl20140306-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6f7/4126623/5603f25129c5/rsbl20140306-g2.jpg

相似文献

1
Keep the nest clean: survival advantages of corpse removal in ants.保持巢穴清洁:蚂蚁移除尸体的生存优势
Biol Lett. 2014 Jul;10(7). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0306.
2
Emergency measures: Adaptive response to pathogen intrusion in the ant nest.应急措施:蚁巢对病原体入侵的适应性反应。
Behav Processes. 2015 Jul;116:80-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.04.016. Epub 2015 May 1.
3
Social prophylaxis through distant corpse removal in ants.蚂蚁通过远距离搬运尸体进行社会预防。
Naturwissenschaften. 2012 Oct;99(10):833-42. doi: 10.1007/s00114-012-0965-6. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
4
Post-mortem changes in chemical profile and their influence on corpse removal in ants.死后化学特征的变化及其对蚂蚁尸体移除的影响。
J Chem Ecol. 2013 Dec;39(11-12):1424-32. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0365-1. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
5
Ants detect but do not discriminate diseased workers within their nest.蚂蚁能够察觉到蚁巢内患病的工蚁,但不会对其进行区分。
Naturwissenschaften. 2016 Aug;103(7-8):70. doi: 10.1007/s00114-016-1394-8. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
6
Interactions between worker ants may influence the growth of ant cemeteries.工蚁之间的相互作用可能会影响蚁冢的生长。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 11;10(1):2344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59202-0.
7
Co-founding ant queens prevent disease by performing prophylactic undertaking behaviour.共同建立巢穴的蚁后通过进行预防性清理行为来预防疾病。
BMC Evol Biol. 2017 Oct 13;17(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-1062-4.
8
Different lethal treatments induce changes in piperidine (1,1'-(1,2-ethanediyl)bis-) in the epidermal compounds of red imported fire ants and affect corpse-removal behavior.不同致死处理方式会改变红火蚁表皮化合物中的哌啶(1,1'-(1,2-乙二基)双-),并影响其尸体清除行为。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 May;194:110391. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110391. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
9
Corpse management in social insects.昆虫社会中的尸体管理。
Int J Biol Sci. 2013;9(3):313-21. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.5781. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
10
Differential Behavioral Responses of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Workers Toward Nestmate and Non-Nestmate Corpses.红火蚁(膜翅目:蚁科)工蚁对同种及异种尸体的差异化行为反应。
J Insect Sci. 2020 Jul 1;20(4). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieaa069.

引用本文的文献

1
Modulation of C. elegans behavior, fitness, and lifespan by AWB/ASH-dependent death perception.通过依赖AWB/ASH的死亡感知对秀丽隐杆线虫行为、健康状况和寿命的调节
Curr Biol. 2025 May 5;35(9):2128-2138.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.03.071. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
Social organization of necrophoresis: insights into disease risk management in ant societies.尸体搬运的社会组织:对蚂蚁社会中疾病风险管理的见解。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Dec 11;11(12):240764. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240764. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Multiomic interpretation of fungus-infected ant metabolomes during manipulated summit disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-mortem changes in chemical profile and their influence on corpse removal in ants.死后化学特征的变化及其对蚂蚁尸体移除的影响。
J Chem Ecol. 2013 Dec;39(11-12):1424-32. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0365-1. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
2
Social prophylaxis through distant corpse removal in ants.蚂蚁通过远距离搬运尸体进行社会预防。
Naturwissenschaften. 2012 Oct;99(10):833-42. doi: 10.1007/s00114-012-0965-6. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
3
Evidence of cue synergism in termite corpse response behavior.白蚁尸体反应行为中线索协同作用的证据。
在人为引发的山顶病期间,对受真菌感染的蚂蚁代谢组进行多组学解读。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 1;13(1):14363. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40065-0.
4
Varying impact of neonicotinoid insecticide and acute bee paralysis virus across castes and colonies of black garden ants, Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).不同烟碱类杀虫剂和急性麻痹病毒对黑腹园林蚁(膜翅目:蚁科)不同品级和蚁群的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 15;11(1):20500. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98406-w.
5
Preventing Transmission of Lethal Disease: Removal Behaviour of (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Towards Fungus Contaminated Aphids.预防致命疾病的传播:蚂蚁(膜翅目:蚁科)对感染真菌的蚜虫的清除行为
Insects. 2021 Jan 24;12(2):99. doi: 10.3390/insects12020099.
6
Prophylactic Avoidance of Hazardous Prey by the Ant Host .蚂蚁宿主对有害猎物的预防性规避
Insects. 2020 Jul 14;11(7):444. doi: 10.3390/insects11070444.
7
Long-term effects of neonicotinoid insecticides on ants.长期使用新烟碱类杀虫剂对蚂蚁的影响。
Commun Biol. 2020 Jun 26;3(1):335. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-1066-2.
8
Comparison of Twelve Ant Species and Their Susceptibility to Fungal Infection.十二种蚂蚁物种及其对真菌感染易感性的比较。
Insects. 2019 Aug 26;10(9):271. doi: 10.3390/insects10090271.
9
Corpse management of the invasive Argentine ant inhibits growth of pathogenic fungi.尸体管理的入侵阿根廷蚂蚁抑制生长的致病性真菌。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 20;9(1):7593. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44144-z.
10
Hygiene Defense Behaviors Used by a Fungus-Growing Ant Depend on the Fungal Pathogen Stages.一种培菌蚁所采用的卫生防御行为取决于真菌病原体的阶段。
Insects. 2019 May 5;10(5):130. doi: 10.3390/insects10050130.
Naturwissenschaften. 2012 Feb;99(2):89-93. doi: 10.1007/s00114-011-0871-3. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
4
Sick ants become unsociable.生病的蚂蚁变得不合群。
J Evol Biol. 2012 Feb;25(2):342-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02425.x. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
5
Altruistic self-removal of health-compromised honey bee workers from their hive.利他性地将健康受损的工蜂从蜂巢中移除。
J Evol Biol. 2010 Jul;23(7):1538-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02022.x. Epub 2010 May 24.
6
Adaptive social immunity in leaf-cutting ants.切叶蚁的适应性社会免疫
Biol Lett. 2009 Aug 23;5(4):446-8. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0107. Epub 2009 May 1.
7
Social immunity.社会免疫
Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R693-702. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.008.
8
Immune pathways and defence mechanisms in honey bees Apis mellifera.蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)的免疫途径和防御机制
Insect Mol Biol. 2006 Oct;15(5):645-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00682.x.
9
Trade-offs in group living: transmission and disease resistance in leaf-cutting ants.群居生活的权衡:切叶蚁的传播与抗病能力
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 7;269(1502):1811-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2113.
10
The development of immunity in a social insect: evidence for the group facilitation of disease resistance.社会性昆虫免疫力的发展:群体促进抗病性的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 May 14;99(10):6838-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.102176599.