• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative quality of life study between endoscopic sphincterotomy and surgical choledochotomy.内镜括约肌切开术与外科胆总管切开术的生活质量对比研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 7;20(25):8237-43. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8237.
2
Outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy open choledochotomy for common bile duct stones.内镜下括约肌切开术与开腹胆总管切开取石术治疗胆总管结石的结局比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 28;25(4):485-497. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i4.485.
3
Comparison between emergency and elective endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis: is emergency endoscopic sphincterotomy safe?胆总管结石所致急性胆管炎患者急诊与择期内镜括约肌切开术的比较:急诊内镜括约肌切开术安全吗?
J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(10):1080-8. doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0100-4. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
4
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective single-center study on the short-term and long-term treatment results in 483 patients.内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石:一项针对483例患者短期和长期治疗结果的前瞻性单中心研究。
Endoscopy. 1997 May;29(4):258-65. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1004186.
5
Two-stage vs single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones.胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的两阶段与单阶段管理。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun 28;18(24):3156-66. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i24.3156.
6
Three modalities on management of choledocholithiasis: A prospective cohort study.三种方法治疗胆总管结石:前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2017 Aug;44:269-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.032. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
7
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with T-tube choledochotomy for the management of choledocholithiasis.腹腔镜胆总管探查术联合T管胆管切开术治疗胆总管结石。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2005 Jun;15(3):298-302. doi: 10.1089/lap.2005.15.298.
8
Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs sphincterotomy alone for removal of common bile duct stones.小括约肌切开术联合内镜乳头大球囊扩张术与单纯括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石的比较
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 21;20(47):17962-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17962.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Single-Session Endoscopic Stone Removal for Acute Cholangitis Associated with Choledocholithiasis.单次内镜取石术治疗急性胆管炎合并胆总管结石的疗效和安全性。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug 8;2018:3145107. doi: 10.1155/2018/3145107. eCollection 2018.
10
Microbiologic risk factors of recurrent choledocholithiasis post-endoscopic sphincterotomy.经内镜括约肌切开术后复发性胆总管结石的微生物学危险因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar 28;28(12):1257-1271. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i12.1257.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy of laparoscopic primary closure of the common bile duct and T-tube drainage in the treatment of choledocholithiasis in elderly patients.腹腔镜胆总管一期缝合与T管引流治疗老年胆总管结石疗效比较
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06210-2.
2
Outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy open choledochotomy for common bile duct stones.内镜下括约肌切开术与开腹胆总管切开取石术治疗胆总管结石的结局比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 28;25(4):485-497. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i4.485.
3
Clinical research for delayed hemorrhage after endoscopic sphincterotomy.内镜括约肌切开术后迟发性出血的临床研究
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Apr 15;8(4):5753-9. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in demographic features of gallstone disease: 30 years of surgically treated patients.胆石病人口学特征的变化:30 年手术治疗患者的回顾性分析。
Gut Liver. 2013 Nov;7(6):719-24. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2013.7.6.719. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
2
Synchronous vs sequential laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与序贯腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊胆管结石。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr 7;19(13):2080-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i13.2080.
3
Usefulness of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotomy for removal of difficult common bile duct stones.经皮经肝胆道镜取石术在清除困难性胆总管结石中的应用价值。
Clin Endosc. 2013 Jan;46(1):65-70. doi: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.1.65. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
4
Percutaneous trans-papillary elimination of common bile duct stones using an existing gallbladder drain for access.利用现有的胆囊引流管进行经皮经乳头胆管结石清除术以建立入路。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2012 Jun;14(6):354-8.
5
Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality-of-life scores compared with multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized blinded comparison.单切口手术与多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比,具有更高的成本,但疼痛和生活质量评分相当:一项前瞻性随机盲法比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Nov;215(5):702-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.038. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
6
Primary closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.腹腔镜胆总管探查术中行一期缝合与 T 管引流的对比:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Aug;397(6):909-16. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0962-4. Epub 2012 May 29.
7
Laparoscopic exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜探查与术中内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石:前瞻性随机试验。
Dig Surg. 2011;28(5-6):424-31. doi: 10.1159/000331470. Epub 2012 Jan 7.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic and large common bile duct stones.体外冲击波碎石术治疗胰胆管结石。
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Oct 21;17(39):4365-71. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i39.4365.
9
ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES): a safe and definitive management of gallstone pancreatitis with the gallbladder left in situ.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)和内镜括约肌切开术(ES):安全且确定的治疗方法,适用于保留胆囊原位的胆石性胰腺炎。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Dec;15(12):2205-10. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1729-x. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
10
Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术患者的健康相关生活质量。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2011 Jul;27(7):280-8. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

内镜括约肌切开术与外科胆总管切开术的生活质量对比研究。

Comparative quality of life study between endoscopic sphincterotomy and surgical choledochotomy.

作者信息

Liu Feng, Bai Xue, Duan Guang-Feng, Tian Wen-Hua, Li Zhao-Shen, Song Bin

机构信息

Feng Liu, Zhao-Shen Li, Bin Song, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 7;20(25):8237-43. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8237.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8237
PMID:25009398
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4081698/
Abstract

AIM

To determine quality of life improvement in choledocholithiasis patients who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) versus open choledochotomy (OCT).

METHODS

Eligible choledocholithiasis patients (n = 216) hospitalized in the Changhai Hospital between May 2010 and January 2011 were enrolled into a prospective study using cluster sampling. Patients underwent EST (n = 135) or OCT (n = 81) depending on the patient's wishes. Patients were followed-up with a field survey and by correspondence. Patients were also given the self-administered Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) to measure patient quality of life before surgery, and at two and six weeks after the procedures.

RESULTS

With respect to baseline patient characteristics, the EST and OCT groups were comparable. After the procedure, gallstones were completely eliminated in all patients. Among 216 eligible patients, 191 patients (88.4%) completed all three surveys, including 118 patients who underwent EST (118/135; 87.4%) and 73 patients who underwent OCT (73/81; 90.1%). EST was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay than OCT (8.8 ± 6.5 vs 13.9 ± 6.7 d; P < 0.001). The GIQLI score was similar between the EST and OCT groups before cholelithotomy (103.0 ± 15.4 vs 99.7 ± 10.2), but increased significantly in the EST group at two weeks (113.4 ± 12.0 vs 107.2 ± 11.2; P < 0.001) and six weeks (120.7 ± 10.6 vs 116.9 ± 7.5; P < 0.05) after the procedures.

CONCLUSION

EST, compared with OCT, is associated with better postoperative quality of life in patients treated for choledocholithiasis.

摘要

目的

比较接受内镜括约肌切开术(EST)与开腹胆总管切开术(OCT)的胆总管结石患者生活质量的改善情况。

方法

采用整群抽样法,对2010年5月至2011年1月在长海医院住院的符合条件的胆总管结石患者(n = 216)进行前瞻性研究。根据患者意愿,患者接受EST(n = 135)或OCT(n = 81)治疗。通过现场调查和通信对患者进行随访。术前、术后两周和六周,患者还需自行填写胃肠道生活质量指数(GIQLI),以评估患者的生活质量。

结果

在基线患者特征方面,EST组和OCT组具有可比性。术后,所有患者的胆结石均被完全清除。在216例符合条件的患者中,191例患者(88.4%)完成了全部三项调查,其中118例接受EST治疗(118/135;87.4%),73例接受OCT治疗(73/81;90.1%)。EST组的住院时间明显短于OCT组(8.8±6.5天 vs 13.9±6.7天;P < 0.001)。在胆囊切除术之前,EST组和OCT组的GIQLI评分相似(103.0±15.4 vs 99.7±10.2),但术后两周(113.4±12.0 vs 107.2±11.2;P < 0.001)和六周(120.7±10.6 vs 116.9±7.5;P < 0.05)时,EST组的评分显著升高。

结论

与OCT相比,EST可使胆总管结石患者术后生活质量更佳。