Suppr超能文献

癫痫发作在何时以及如何导致神经元死亡,细胞死亡与癫痫发生是否相关?

When and how do seizures kill neurons, and is cell death relevant to epileptogenesis?

作者信息

Dingledine Ray, Varvel Nicholas H, Dudek F Edward

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA,

出版信息

Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;813:109-22. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-8914-1_9.

Abstract

The effect of seizures on neuronal death and the role of seizure-induced neuronal death in acquired epileptogenesis have been debated for decades. Isolated brief seizures probably do not kill neurons; however, severe and repetitive seizures (i.e., status epilepticus) certainly do. Because status epilepticus both kills neurons and also leads to chronic epilepsy, neuronal death has been proposed to be an integral part of acquired epileptogenesis. Several studies, particularly in the immature brain, have suggested that neuronal death is not necessary for acquired epileptogenesis; however, the lack of neuronal death is difficult if not impossible to prove, and more recent studies have challenged this concept. Novel mechanisms of cell death, beyond the traditional concepts of necrosis and apoptosis, include autophagy, phagoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis. The traditional proposal for why neuronal death may be necessary for epileptogenesis is based on the recapitulation of development hypothesis, where a loss of synaptic input from the dying neurons is considered a critical signal to induce axonal sprouting and synaptic-circuit reorganization. We propose a second hypothesis - the neuronal death pathway hypothesis, which states that the biochemical pathways causing programmed neurodegeneration, rather than neuronal death per se, are responsible for or contribute to epileptogenesis. The reprogramming of neuronal death pathways - if true - is proposed to derive from necroptosis or pyroptosis. The proposed new hypothesis may inform on why neuronal death seems closely linked to epileptogenesis, but may not always be.

摘要

癫痫发作对神经元死亡的影响以及癫痫发作诱导的神经元死亡在获得性癫痫发生中的作用已经争论了数十年。孤立的短暂癫痫发作可能不会导致神经元死亡;然而,严重且反复的癫痫发作(即癫痫持续状态)肯定会。由于癫痫持续状态既会导致神经元死亡,又会引发慢性癫痫,因此有人提出神经元死亡是获得性癫痫发生的一个重要组成部分。多项研究,尤其是在未成熟大脑中的研究表明,神经元死亡对于获得性癫痫发生并非必要;然而,即使并非不可能,缺乏神经元死亡也很难证明,而且最近的研究对这一概念提出了挑战。除了传统的坏死和凋亡概念之外,新的细胞死亡机制还包括自噬、吞噬性细胞死亡、坏死性凋亡和炎性程序性坏死。关于神经元死亡为何可能是癫痫发生所必需的传统观点基于发育假说的重演,即垂死神经元的突触输入丧失被认为是诱导轴突发芽和突触回路重组的关键信号。我们提出了第二个假说——神经元死亡途径假说,该假说认为导致程序性神经退行性变的生化途径,而非神经元死亡本身,是癫痫发生的原因或促成因素。如果属实,神经元死亡途径的重编程被认为源自坏死性凋亡或炎性程序性坏死。所提出的新假说或许可以解释为何神经元死亡似乎与癫痫发生密切相关,但并非总是如此。

相似文献

3

引用本文的文献

1
Pathophysiology of Status Epilepticus Revisited.癫痫持续状态的病理生理学再探讨。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 3;26(15):7502. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157502.

本文引用的文献

2
Phagocytosis executes delayed neuronal death after focal brain ischemia.吞噬作用执行局灶性脑缺血后的迟发性神经元死亡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 22;110(43):E4098-107. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308679110. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
3
Autophagy and cellular immune responses.自噬与细胞免疫应答。
Immunity. 2013 Aug 22;39(2):211-27. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.017.
9
Altered expression of CX3CL1 in patients with epilepsy and in a rat model.CX3CL1 在癫痫患者和大鼠模型中的表达改变。
Am J Pathol. 2012 May;180(5):1950-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.01.024. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验