García Bustos María F, Barrio Alejandra, Prieto Gabriela G, de Raspi Emma M, Cimino Rubén O, Cardozo Rubén M, Parada Luis A, Yeo Matthew, Soto Jaime, Uncos Delfor A, Parodi Cecilia, Basombrío Miguel A
Instituto de Patología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Salta. Av. Bolivia 5150 (4400), Salta Capital, República Argentina.
J Parasitol. 2014 Dec;100(6):840-7. doi: 10.1645/13-376.1.
Leishmaniasis, a disease caused by parasites of the Leishmania genus, constitutes a significant health and social problem in many countries and is increasing worldwide. The conventional treatment, meglumine antimoniate (MA), presents numerous disadvantages, including invasiveness, toxicity, and frequent therapeutic failure, justifying the attempts at finding alternatives to the first-line therapy. We have studied the comparative long-term efficacy of MA against miltefosine (MF) in Leishmania infection in experimental mice. The criteria for efficacy evaluation were footpad lesion size, anti-Leishmania antibodies level, histopathology of the site of inoculation (right footpad, RFP), splenic index (SI), and the presence of parasites in RFP, spleen, and liver, determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Swiss mice, infected with Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis were treated, at different time points (5 and 40 days after infection) with either MA or MF. The efficacy of MF was better than that of MA for inhibiting lesions and for reducing tissue damage and presence/load of amastigotes in spleen and liver. Moreover, early administration of MF produced a clear reduction in splenomegaly and was equal in reducing antibody titles in comparison with MA. Our results demonstrated that MF is an effective and safe therapeutic alternative for leishmaniasis by L. (L.) amazonensis and is more efficacious than MA.
利什曼病是一种由利什曼原虫属寄生虫引起的疾病,在许多国家构成了严重的健康和社会问题,并且在全球范围内呈上升趋势。传统治疗药物葡甲胺锑酸盐(MA)存在诸多缺点,包括侵入性、毒性以及频繁的治疗失败,这使得寻找一线治疗替代方案成为必要。我们研究了MA与米替福新(MF)在实验小鼠利什曼原虫感染中的长期疗效比较。疗效评估标准包括足垫病变大小、抗利什曼原虫抗体水平、接种部位(右足垫,RFP)的组织病理学、脾指数(SI)以及通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)测定的RFP、脾脏和肝脏中寄生虫的存在情况。用亚马逊利什曼原虫(Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis)感染的瑞士小鼠在不同时间点(感染后5天和40天)分别接受MA或MF治疗。在抑制病变、减少组织损伤以及降低脾脏和肝脏中无鞭毛体的存在/负荷方面,MF的疗效优于MA。此外,早期给予MF能明显减轻脾肿大,并且在降低抗体滴度方面与MA相当。我们的结果表明,MF是治疗亚马逊利什曼原虫引起的利什曼病的一种有效且安全的治疗替代方案,并且比MA更有效。