Suppr超能文献

社区胃肠病学和初级保健机构中慢性乙型肝炎患者的治疗资格及实际治疗率

Chronic hepatitis B treatment eligibility and actual treatment rates in patients in community gastroenterology and primary care settings.

作者信息

Nguyen Vincent G, Wan Kenton, Trinh Huy N, Li Jiayi, Zhang Jian Q, Nguyen Mindie H

机构信息

*Pacific Health Foundation ‡San Jose Gastroenterology, San Jose †Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto §Department of Gastroenterology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Mountain View ∥Chinese Hospital, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;49(2):145-9. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000132.

Abstract

GOALS

This study aims to compare the eligibility and treatment rates of patients evaluated by gastroenterology [gastrointestinal (GI)] specialists for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and patients followed by their primary care physicians (PCPs) only.

BACKGROUND

Guidelines have been devised to direct the care of patients with CHB but data on the application of these guidelines, especially in primary care settings, has been limited to date.

STUDY

Consecutive CHB patients were enrolled retrospectively from several community clinics in the San Francisco Bay Area: 2 GI referral clinics, 3 primary care clinics, and a multispecialty medical center. Patients were classified as group 1 if they saw a gastroenterologist for CHB within 6 months of presentation or as group 2 if they only saw PCPs. Eligibility according to AASLD 2009 and US Panel 2008 guidelines was determined using clinical and laboratory data available within 6 months of presentation.

RESULTS

Patients in group 2 had lower eligibility rates according to both US Panel 2008 (32% vs. 51%, P < 0.001) and AASLD 2009 (8% vs. 24%, P < 0.001) guidelines. GI specialists treated US Panel-eligible patients more readily than PCPs (45% vs. 25%, P < 0.001), and treatment rates in AASLD-eligible patients suggested a similar trend (68% vs. 50%, P = 0.080).

CONCLUSIONS

GI specialists were more likely than PCPs to see patients who were treatment eligible, and also more likely to initiate antiviral therapy. However, there are still a considerable number of patients from both settings who did not receive treatment despite being eligible.

摘要

目标

本研究旨在比较由胃肠病学(胃肠道)专科医生评估的慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者与仅由其初级保健医生(PCP)随访的患者的符合治疗标准率和治疗率。

背景

已制定指南以指导CHB患者的治疗,但迄今为止,关于这些指南应用的数据,尤其是在初级保健环境中的数据有限。

研究

从旧金山湾区的几个社区诊所回顾性纳入连续的CHB患者:2个胃肠病学转诊诊所、3个初级保健诊所和一个多专科医疗中心。如果患者在就诊后6个月内看过胃肠病学家治疗CHB,则分类为第1组;如果仅看过初级保健医生,则分类为第2组。根据2009年美国肝病研究学会(AASLD)和2008年美国专家组指南,使用就诊后6个月内可用的临床和实验室数据确定符合治疗标准情况。

结果

根据2008年美国专家组指南(32%对51%,P<0.001)和2009年AASLD指南(8%对24%,P<0.001),第2组患者的符合治疗标准率较低。胃肠病学专科医生比初级保健医生更愿意治疗符合美国专家组标准的患者(45%对25%,P<0.001),符合AASLD标准患者的治疗率也显示出类似趋势(68%对50%,P=0.080)。

结论

胃肠病学专科医生比初级保健医生更有可能诊治符合治疗标准的患者,也更有可能启动抗病毒治疗。然而,来自这两种环境的仍有相当数量的患者尽管符合治疗标准但未接受治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验