Suppr超能文献

在不同实践环境中符合指南标准的患者的治疗率较低。

Low treatment rates in patients meeting guideline criteria in diverse practice settings.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, 750 Welch Road, Suite 210, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA,

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Sep;59(9):2091-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3283-3. Epub 2014 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Data on usage of antiviral therapy and application of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) management guidelines in different settings are limited. Our goal is to evaluate the proportion of treatment-eligible patients by 6-month follow-up and treatment rate among eligible patients by 12-month follow-up in diverse settings.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 1,976 treatment-naïve CHB patients were categorized as primary care physician (PCP) group if seen by community PCP (n = 329), gastroenterology (GI) group if seen by community gastroenterologists (n = 1,268), and hepatology group if seen by university hepatologists (n = 379). Treatment eligibility was based on the US Panel 2008 and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) 2009 guidelines.

RESULTS

All groups had similar age, gender, and ethnic distribution. GI and hepatology groups had similar treatment eligibility rates by US Panel (53-54 %) and AASLD guidelines (24-25 %). However, treatment rate was significantly higher in hepatology compared to GI group by the US Panel guideline (59 vs. 45 %, P = 0.001). PCP group had the lowest eligibility and treatment rates by both guidelines. Common reasons for non-treatment were perceived "normal" alanine aminotransferase, desire for further observation, and patient refusal. Male gender, age >50, and subspecialty care predicted treatment initiation in treatment-eligible patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Less than half of treatment-eligible patients at primary care clinics received treatment. Community gastroenterology and university liver clinics treated about one-half to two-thirds of eligible patients. Patient and provider education should highlight treatment benefits and the new alanine aminotransferase upper limit of normal.

摘要

背景与目的

不同环境下使用抗病毒治疗和应用慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)管理指南的数据有限。我们的目标是评估不同环境下治疗合格患者的比例(6 个月随访)和合格患者的治疗率(12 个月随访)。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,1976 名未经治疗的 CHB 患者,如果由社区初级保健医生(PCP)就诊(n = 329),则归为 PCP 组;如果由社区胃肠病学家就诊(n = 1268),则归为胃肠病学组;如果由大学肝病学家就诊(n = 379),则归为肝病学组。治疗合格性基于美国专家组 2008 年和美国肝病研究协会(AASLD)2009 年指南。

结果

所有组的年龄、性别和种族分布相似。胃肠病学和肝病学组的美国专家组(53-54%)和 AASLD 指南(24-25%)的治疗合格率相似。然而,根据美国专家组指南,肝病学组的治疗率明显高于胃肠病学组(59% vs. 45%,P = 0.001)。PCP 组根据两项指南的治疗合格率和治疗率均最低。非治疗的常见原因是认为“正常”的丙氨酸氨基转移酶、希望进一步观察和患者拒绝。男性、年龄>50 岁和专科治疗是治疗合格患者开始治疗的预测因素。

结论

初级保健诊所中不到一半的治疗合格患者接受了治疗。社区胃肠病学和大学肝脏诊所治疗了约一半到三分之二的合格患者。应向患者和医务人员强调治疗益处和新的丙氨酸氨基转移酶正常上限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验