• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A prospective, multi-institutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm.一项针对小于2厘米的近端输尿管结石的柔性输尿管镜检查的前瞻性多机构研究。
J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
2
Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi.经输尿管镜治疗大体积、复杂的肾内及上段输尿管结石。
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3 Pt B):E127-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11352.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
3
Combined retrograde flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with holmium YAG laser for renal calculi associated with ipsilateral ureteral stones.联合逆行软性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗合并同侧输尿管结石的肾结石
J Endourol. 2009 Feb;23(2):253-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0368.
4
Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study.经输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管不同部位(远端、中段、上段或多处)结石的效果比较:经自然腔道内镜协会经输尿管镜全球研究临床研究办公室。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
5
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones in children using holmium: yag laser energy: results of a multicentric survey.钬激光碎石术治疗儿童输尿管结石:多中心调查结果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Aug;15(4):391.e1-391.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 8.
6
Ureteral access sheath for the management of pediatric renal and ureteral stones: a single center experience.用于小儿肾和输尿管结石治疗的输尿管通路鞘:单中心经验
J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):1080-2; discussion 1082. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00406-4.
7
Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.近端输尿管结石的治疗:钬激光输尿管碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术的对比
J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):1972-6.
8
[Application of ureteral access sheath in the operation of middle and lower ureteral calculi in patients with massive benign prostatic hyperplasia].输尿管通路鞘在重度良性前列腺增生患者输尿管中下段结石手术中的应用
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 1;60(2):164-168. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20210302-00104.
9
Ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a multi-institutional prospective randomized controlled study assessing pain, outcomes and complications.输尿管镜检查术后输尿管下段结石的输尿管支架置入:一项评估疼痛、结局和并发症的多机构前瞻性随机对照研究
J Urol. 2001 Nov;166(5):1651-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65646-7.
10
Modular flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the treatment of renal and proximal ureteral calculi: A single-surgeon experience of 382 cases.模块化软性输尿管镜及钬激光碎石术治疗肾和输尿管上段结石:单术者382例经验
Exp Ther Med. 2015 Oct;10(4):1467-1471. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2703. Epub 2015 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Dusting versus fragmentation for large proximal ureteral stones during flexible ureteroscopy: A prospective randomized study.输尿管软镜检查治疗大型近端输尿管结石时粉末化与碎石术的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究
Curr Urol. 2025 Jul;19(4):257-262. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000285. Epub 2025 May 19.
2
Vacuum-assisted dedusting lithotripsy: a retrospective comparative study in high-risk patients with positive preoperative urine cultures.真空辅助除尘碎石术:对术前尿培养阳性的高危患者的回顾性比较研究
World J Urol. 2025 Feb 17;43(1):128. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05510-x.
3
Summary of the clinical practice guideline for the management of urinary stones, third edition.《尿路结石管理临床实践指南》第三版总结
Int J Urol. 2025 May;32(5):462-474. doi: 10.1111/iju.70004. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
4
Confirmation of negative urine culture status after appropriate antibiotic treatment prior to endourological stone procedures: Is it really necessary?在进行内镜碎石术之前,适当的抗生素治疗后确认尿液培养阴性:这真的有必要吗?
Urolithiasis. 2024 Feb 8;52(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01524-5.
5
Evaluation of a novel circulation system for ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy in vitro.评估一种新型的输尿管镜激光碎石术体外循环系统。
World J Urol. 2024 Jan 29;42(1):62. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04705-4.
6
Semirigid Flexible Ureteroscopy in the Management of Ureteral Stones - Review.半刚性与柔性输尿管镜在输尿管结石治疗中的应用——综述
Maedica (Bucur). 2023 Sep;18(3):490-497. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.3.490.
7
Femtosecond laser lithotripsy: a novel alternative for kidney stone treatment? Evaluating the safety and effectiveness in an ex vivo study.飞秒激光碎石术:肾结石治疗的一种新选择?一项体外研究中的安全性和有效性评估。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Oct 5;51(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01493-9.
8
A Good Craftsperson Knows Their Tools: Understanding of Laser and Ureter Mechanics in Training Urologists.优秀的工匠熟悉其工具:泌尿外科医生培训中对激光和输尿管力学的理解
J Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Aug 29;14:e29. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2023.29. eCollection 2023.
9
Peri-Ureteral Abscess Formation Following Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy: A Case Report.输尿管镜激光碎石术后输尿管周围脓肿形成:一例报告
Cureus. 2022 Sep 14;14(9):e29165. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29165. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
International Alliance of Urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery.国际尿石症联盟逆行性肾内手术指南。
BJU Int. 2023 Feb;131(2):153-164. doi: 10.1111/bju.15836. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study.经输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管不同部位(远端、中段、上段或多处)结石的效果比较:经自然腔道内镜协会经输尿管镜全球研究临床研究办公室。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
2
A prospective randomized comparison between shockwave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones <2 cm: a single center experience.冲击波碎石术与半硬性输尿管镜治疗小于2厘米上段输尿管结石的前瞻性随机对照研究:单中心经验
J Endourol. 2015 Jan;29(1):47-51. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0493.
3
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub4.
4
Treatment of ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.治疗输尿管和肾结石:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2569. Epub 2012 May 15.
5
Factors influencing urologist treatment preference in surgical management of stone disease.影响泌尿科医生在结石病手术治疗中治疗偏好的因素。
Urology. 2012 May;79(5):996-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.024. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
6
The digital flexible ureteroscope: in vitro assessment of optical characteristics.数字式软性输尿管镜:光学特性的体外评估。
J Endourol. 2011 Mar;25(3):519-22. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0206. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
7
Flexible ureteroscopy is effective for proximal ureteral stones in both obese and nonobese patients: a two-year, single-surgeon experience.软性输尿管镜检查术对于肥胖和非肥胖患者的近端输尿管结石均有效:单外科医生经验两年。
Urology. 2011 Jan;77(1):36-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.001. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
8
A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.一项比较冲击波碎石术和半刚性输尿管镜治疗输尿管上段结石的前瞻性随机研究。
Urology. 2009 Dec;74(6):1216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.076. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
9
Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.冲击波碎石术与半硬性输尿管镜治疗近端输尿管结石(<20mm):一项配对对照研究
Urology. 2009 Jun;73(6):1184-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.064. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
10
A comparison of the physical properties of four new generation flexible ureteroscopes: (de)flection, flow properties, torsion stiffness, and optical characteristics.四种新一代软性输尿管镜的物理特性比较:(去)偏转、流体特性、扭转刚度和光学特性。
J Endourol. 2008 Oct;22(10):2227-34. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0371.

一项针对小于2厘米的近端输尿管结石的柔性输尿管镜检查的前瞻性多机构研究。

A prospective, multi-institutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm.

作者信息

Hyams Elias S, Monga Manoj, Pearle Margaret S, Antonelli Jodi A, Semins Michelle J, Assimos Dean G, Lingeman James E, Pais Vernon M, Preminger Glenn M, Lipkin Michael E, Eisner Brian H, Shah Ojas, Sur Roger L, Mufarrij Patrick W, Matlaga Brian R

机构信息

Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.002
PMID:25014576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4449255/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Flexible ureteroscopy is rapidly becoming a first line therapy for many patients with renal and ureteral stones. However, current understanding of treatment outcomes in patients with isolated proximal ureteral stones is limited. Therefore, we performed a prospective, multi-institutional study of ureteroscopic management of proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm to better define clinical outcomes associated with this approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients with proximal ureteral calculi smaller than 2 cm were prospectively identified. Patients with concomitant ipsilateral renal calculi or prior ureteral stenting were excluded from study. Flexible ureteroscopy, holmium laser lithotripsy and ureteral stent placement was performed. Ureteral access sheath use, laser settings and other details of perioperative and postoperative management were based on individual surgeon preference. Stone clearance was determined by the results of renal ultrasound and plain x-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of 71 patients 44 (62%) were male and 27 (38%) were female. Mean age was 48.2 years. ASA(®) score was 1 in 12 cases (16%), 2 in 41 (58%), 3 in 16 (23%) and 4 in 2 (3%). Mean body mass index was 31.8 kg/m(2), mean stone size was 7.4 mm (range 5 to 15) and mean operative time was 60.3 minutes (range 15 to 148). Intraoperative complications occurred in 2 patients (2.8%), including mild ureteral trauma. Postoperative complications developed in 6 patients (8.7%), including urinary tract infection in 3, urinary retention in 2 and flash pulmonary edema in 1. The stone-free rate was 95% and for stones smaller than 1 cm it was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Flexible ureteroscopy is associated with excellent clinical outcomes and acceptable morbidity when applied to patients with proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm.

摘要

目的

对于许多肾和输尿管结石患者而言,可弯曲输尿管镜检查正迅速成为一线治疗方法。然而,目前对于孤立性近端输尿管结石患者治疗结果的了解有限。因此,我们开展了一项针对小于2 cm的近端输尿管结石的输尿管镜治疗的前瞻性多机构研究,以更好地明确这种治疗方法相关的临床结果。

材料与方法

前瞻性纳入近端输尿管结石小于2 cm的成年患者。排除伴有同侧肾结石或既往有输尿管支架置入史的患者。进行可弯曲输尿管镜检查、钬激光碎石术及输尿管支架置入。输尿管通路鞘的使用、激光设置以及围手术期和术后管理的其他细节取决于术者个人偏好。术后4至6周通过肾脏超声及肾脏、输尿管和膀胱的X线平片结果确定结石清除情况。

结果

71例患者中,44例(62%)为男性,27例(38%)为女性。平均年龄为48.2岁。美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级:1级12例(16%),2级41例(58%),3级16例(23%),4级2例(3%)。平均体重指数为31.8 kg/m²,平均结石大小为7.4 mm(范围5至15 mm),平均手术时间为60.3分钟(范围15至148分钟)。2例患者(2.8%)出现术中并发症,包括轻度输尿管损伤。6例患者(8.7%)出现术后并发症,包括3例尿路感染、2例尿潴留和1例闪发性肺水肿。结石清除率为95%,对于小于1 cm的结石,结石清除率为100%。

结论

对于小于2 cm的近端输尿管结石患者,可弯曲输尿管镜检查具有良好的临床效果且并发症发生率可接受。