Yang Sixing, Dong Caitao, Song Chao, Liao Wenbiao, He Ziqi, Jiang Shengming, Sun Chang, Wang Yunhan, Xiong Yunhe
Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.
Urolithiasis. 2023 Oct 5;51(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01493-9.
The Holmium (Ho:YAG) laser is presently the most extensively employed in laser lithotripsy for the management of kidney stones. Despite its adoption as the gold standard for laser lithotripsy, Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy poses three significant challenges, namely thermal effect, insufficient stone fragmentation, and stone displacement, which have garnered increased attention from urologic surgeons. Nowadays, the femtosecond laser is regarded as a potential alternative to the Ho:YAG laser due to its capacity to ablate diverse materials with minimal thermal effect. In our ex vivo investigation, we assessed the dimensions of ablation pits, the efficacy of ablation, the degree of stone fragmentation, the alterations in water temperature surrounding stones, and the degree of tissue damage associated with Femtosecond laser lithotripsy utilizing adjustable power settings (1-50 W). Our findings indicate that the ablation pits generated by the Femtosecond laser exhibited uniform geometries, and the effectiveness of ablation and fragmentation for Femtosecond laser lithotripsy were significantly and positively correlated with laser power. When the laser power remained constant, the Femtosecond laser with higher pulse energy demonstrated superior efficiency in stone ablation, but inferior performance in stone fragmentation. Conversely, the Femtosecond laser with higher pulse frequency exhibited the opposite behavior. Furthermore, the thermal effect increased proportionally with laser power, leading to a tentative recommendation of 10W laser power for future investigations. Our in vitro findings suggest that the Femtosecond laser holds promise as a safe and effective alternative to holmium lasers.
钬(Ho:YAG)激光目前是肾结石治疗中激光碎石术应用最广泛的激光。尽管Ho:YAG激光碎石术已被采纳为激光碎石术的金标准,但它存在三个重大挑战,即热效应、结石破碎不足和结石移位,这已引起泌尿外科医生越来越多的关注。如今,飞秒激光因其能够以最小的热效应消融多种材料而被视为Ho:YAG激光的潜在替代品。在我们的体外研究中,我们使用可调功率设置(1 - 50W)评估了飞秒激光碎石术的消融坑尺寸、消融效果、结石破碎程度、结石周围水温变化以及组织损伤程度。我们的研究结果表明,飞秒激光产生的消融坑呈现出均匀的几何形状,并且飞秒激光碎石术的消融和破碎效果与激光功率显著正相关。当激光功率保持恒定时,具有较高脉冲能量的飞秒激光在结石消融方面表现出更高的效率,但在结石破碎方面表现较差。相反,具有较高脉冲频率的飞秒激光则表现出相反的行为。此外,热效应随激光功率成比例增加,因此初步建议在未来研究中使用10W的激光功率。我们的体外研究结果表明,飞秒激光有望成为钬激光安全有效的替代品。