Feinson Marjorie C, Meir Adi
Falk Institute for Behavioral Health Studies, Kfar Shaul, Givat Shaul, Jerusalem, Israel
Falk Institute for Behavioral Health Studies, Kfar Shaul, Givat Shaul, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Interpers Violence. 2015 Feb;30(3):499-521. doi: 10.1177/0886260514535094. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
Although childhood abuse is an established risk factor for mental health problems in adulthood, there is relatively little empirical evidence concerning intervening factors that may mitigate the risk. One potentially protective factor is religiosity. A unique opportunity to explore religiosity's relevance exists with a community-based sample of adult Jewish women that includes sizable subsamples of both rigorously devout ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) and nonreligious Secular Jews. A global measure of any childhood abuse (ACA) includes sexual, physical, and/or emotional abuse. Mental health is assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI distress) and a single item reflecting unresolved anger about the past. Predictors of distress severity are examined with separate hierarchical regressions for each religious observance (RO) group. Despite being located at opposite ends of the religiosity spectrum, several surprising similarities emerge including no significant RO group differences in distress among abuse survivors. Moreover, ACA emerges as the strongest predictor of BSI distress within both groups and regressions explain similar amounts of variance. In contrast, two important differences emerge regarding unresolved anger and any recent abuse (ARA). Anger makes a strong contribution to explaining Haredi distress severity, less so for Secular respondents (6.1% vs. 2.9% respectively) while ARA is significant only for Haredi respondents. These initial findings suggest that abusive traumas in childhood may seriously compromise religiosity's potentially protective role. Broadening the research agenda to focus on resilient survivors would expand our understanding of healing resources-both within and outside of a religious framework. Moreover, a better understanding of unresolved anger would likely enhance interventions with greater potential for mitigating the suffering of those abused in childhood.
尽管童年期受虐是成年期心理健康问题的一个既定风险因素,但关于可能减轻该风险的干预因素的实证证据相对较少。一个潜在的保护因素是宗教信仰。在一个以社区为基础的成年犹太女性样本中,存在一个探索宗教信仰相关性的独特机会,该样本包括相当数量的严格虔诚的极端正统派(哈雷迪)犹太人和非宗教的世俗犹太人子样本。对任何童年期受虐情况(ACA)的总体衡量包括性虐待、身体虐待和/或情感虐待。心理健康通过简明症状量表(BSI 困扰)和一个反映对过去未解决愤怒的单项指标进行评估。针对每个宗教仪式(RO)组,通过单独的分层回归来检验困扰严重程度的预测因素。尽管处于宗教信仰光谱的两端,但仍出现了一些惊人的相似之处,包括虐待幸存者在困扰方面没有显著的 RO 组差异。此外,ACA 在两组中均成为 BSI 困扰的最强预测因素,回归解释的方差量相似。相比之下,在未解决的愤怒和任何近期受虐情况(ARA)方面出现了两个重要差异。愤怒对解释哈雷迪人的困扰严重程度有很大贡献,对世俗受访者的贡献较小(分别为 6.1%和 2.9%),而 ARA 仅对哈雷迪受访者有显著影响。这些初步发现表明,童年期的虐待创伤可能严重损害宗教信仰的潜在保护作用。拓宽研究议程以关注有复原力的幸存者,将扩大我们对宗教框架内外治愈资源的理解。此外,更好地理解未解决的愤怒可能会增强干预措施,更有潜力减轻童年期受虐者的痛苦。