• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2014年全国护理研究圆桌会议:护理科学

The 2014 National Nursing Research Roundtable: The science of caregiving.

作者信息

Grady Patricia A, Gullatte Mary

机构信息

National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 2014 Sep-Oct;62(5):362-5. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2014.05.007
PMID:25015405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4183208/
Abstract

The National Nursing Research Roundtable (NNRR) meets annually to provide an opportunity for the leaders of nursing organizations with a research mission to discuss and disseminate research findings to improve health outcomes. In 2014, the NNRR addressed the science of caregiving, a topic of increasing importance given that more people are living with chronic conditions and that managing chronic illness is shifting from providers to individuals, their families, and the communities where they live. The NNRR consisted of scientific presentations in which leading researchers discussed the latest advances in caregiving science across the life span and breakout sessions where specific questions were discussed. The questions focused on the policy and practice implications of caregiving science and provided an opportunity for nursing leaders to discuss ways to advance caregiving science. The nursing community is ideally positioned to design and test caregiver health interventions and to implement these interventions in clinical and community settings.

摘要

国家护理研究圆桌会议(NNRR)每年举行会议,为有研究使命的护理组织领导人提供一个机会,以讨论和传播研究结果,从而改善健康结局。2014年,NNRR探讨了照护科学,鉴于越来越多的人患有慢性病,且慢性病管理正从医疗服务提供者转向患者本人、其家庭以及他们生活的社区,这一话题愈发重要。NNRR包括科学报告环节,顶尖研究人员在其中讨论了照护科学在整个生命周期内的最新进展,还设有分组讨论环节,会上讨论了具体问题。这些问题聚焦于照护科学的政策和实践意义,为护理领导人提供了一个讨论推进照护科学方法的机会。护理界在设计和测试照护者健康干预措施以及在临床和社区环境中实施这些干预措施方面具有理想的条件。

相似文献

1
The 2014 National Nursing Research Roundtable: The science of caregiving.2014年全国护理研究圆桌会议:护理科学
Nurs Outlook. 2014 Sep-Oct;62(5):362-5. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
2
Research Agenda of the Oncology Nursing Society: 2019-2022.肿瘤护理学会2019 - 2022年研究议程
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 Nov 1;46(6):654-669. doi: 10.1188/19.ONF.654-669.
3
From Nightingale to the new millennium: charting the research and policy agenda for the nursing workforce.从南丁格尔到新千年:规划护理劳动力的研究与政策议程。
Nurs Outlook. 2004 May-Jun;52(3):155-7. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2004.05.002.
4
Research Agenda of the Oncology Nursing Society: 2019-2022 (Executive Summary).肿瘤护理学会2019 - 2022年研究议程(执行摘要)
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 Nov 1;46(6):651-653. doi: 10.1188/19.ONF.651-653.
5
Improving healthcare and outcomes for high-risk children and teens: formation of the National Consortium for Pediatric and Adolescent Evidence-Based Practice.改善高危儿童和青少年的医疗保健及治疗效果:成立国家儿科和青少年循证实践联盟。
Pediatr Nurs. 2007 Nov-Dec;33(6):525-9.
6
Nursing research: the Canadian scene.护理研究:加拿大的情况。
Int J Nurs Stud. 1990;27(2):105-22. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(90)90065-q.
7
Building knowledge in nursing and midwifery--European Academy of Nursing Science.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2001 Aug;38(4):373-4. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(00)00099-7.
8
The Emerging Scholars' Network Within MNRS: From Acorns to Oaks.MNRS 内部新兴学者网络:从橡子到橡树。
West J Nurs Res. 2020 Feb;42(2):143-152. doi: 10.1177/0193945919845065. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
9
Staying Focused On Our Mission: Message From the President.专注于我们的使命:校长致辞
Res Nurs Health. 2016 Feb;39(1):7-8. doi: 10.1002/nur.21704. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
10
Forensic nursing science in 2008.2008年的法医护理学
J Forensic Nurs. 2008;4(1):45-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2008.00006.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Nursing research priorities based on CINAHL database: A scoping review.基于CINAHL数据库的护理研究重点:一项范围综述。
Nurs Open. 2019 Dec 26;7(2):483-494. doi: 10.1002/nop2.428. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Unpaid Informal Caregivers in South Australia: Population Characteristics, Prevalence and Age-Period-Cohort Effects 1994-2014.南澳大利亚的无偿非正式照料者:1994 - 2014年的人口特征、患病率及年龄 - 时期 - 队列效应
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 20;11(9):e0161994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161994. eCollection 2016.
3
The Physical Health of Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and the Psychological Health of their Family Caregivers When Newly Enrolled in Hospice.晚期胰腺癌患者及其家庭照顾者刚进入临终关怀时的身体健康与心理健康
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;17(3):235-241. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000154.
4
Competence, Compassion, and Care of the Self: Family Caregiving Needs and Concerns in Heart Failure.能力、同情心与自我关怀:心力衰竭患者家庭护理的需求与担忧
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):209-14. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000241.

本文引用的文献

1
From stress to inflammation and major depressive disorder: a social signal transduction theory of depression.从压力到炎症再到重度抑郁症:一种抑郁症的社会信号转导理论。
Psychol Bull. 2014 May;140(3):774-815. doi: 10.1037/a0035302. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
2
Patterns of family management of childhood chronic conditions and their relationship to child and family functioning.儿童慢性疾病的家庭管理模式及其与儿童和家庭功能的关系。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(6):523-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
3
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels and cancer mortality.高敏 C 反应蛋白水平与癌症死亡率。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Nov;21(11):2076-86. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0611.
4
Meta-analysis of nonpharmacological interventions for neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia.非药物干预对痴呆患者神经精神症状的荟萃分析。
Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;169(9):946-53. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11101529.
5
A randomized controlled trial of the tumor necrosis factor antagonist infliximab for treatment-resistant depression: the role of baseline inflammatory biomarkers.一项针对肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂英夫利昔单抗治疗抵抗性抑郁症的随机对照试验:基线炎症生物标志物的作用。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;70(1):31-41. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.4.
6
Randomized clinical trial of a brief and extensive dyadic intervention for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers.一项针对晚期癌症患者及其家庭照顾者的简短和广泛的对偶干预的随机临床试验。
Psychooncology. 2013 Mar;22(3):555-63. doi: 10.1002/pon.3036. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
7
Adapting an in-person patient-caregiver communication intervention to a tailored web-based format.将面对面的医患沟通干预措施改编为定制的基于网络的格式。
Psychooncology. 2012 Mar;21(3):336-41. doi: 10.1002/pon.1900. Epub 2011 Jan 23.
8
Interventions for supporting informal caregivers of patients in the terminal phase of a disease.针对疾病终末期患者非正式照护者的支持干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15(6):CD007617. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007617.pub2.
9
Loss of lifestyle: health behaviour and weight changes after becoming a caregiver of a family member diagnosed with ovarian cancer.失去生活方式:家庭成员被诊断出患有卵巢癌后,照顾者的健康行为和体重变化。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Dec;19(12):1949-56. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-1035-2. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
10
Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials.癌症患者家属照护者干预措施:随机试验的荟萃分析。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):317-39. doi: 10.3322/caac.20081. Epub 2010 Aug 13.